Unknown

Dataset Information

Flowable Bulk-Fill Materials Compared to Nano Ceramic Composites for Class I Cavities Restorations in Primary Molars: A Two-Year Prospective Case-Control Study.


ABSTRACT: The aim of this split-mouth study is to compare the results of 24 months' clinical performance of primary molar Class I restorations with a nano-ceramic composite, Ceram•X mono (Dentsply) with a flowable bulk-fill material regular viscosity, SDR (Dentsply). Following the ethical approval, 27 patients with at least two class I cavities in primary molars were included in the study. A total number of 54 restorations were conducted (n = 27 for Ceram X and n = 27 for SDR). Restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 18, and 24 months, according to the modified Ryge criteria. The cavosurface marginal discoloration and color match were evaluated visually after air-drying the tooth and after removing the plaque (if necessary). At 24 months' follow-up, 54 restorations showed similar clinical perfor

SUBMITTER: Sarapultseva M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6960826 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature