Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The impact of support provided by close others in the emergency department on threat perceptions.


ABSTRACT: Objective: Having close others present in the emergency department (ED) can cause patients significant distress. The present study tested the hypothesis that close others provide more negative support than non-close others as a potential explanation for this effect.Design: Participants were 493 patients evaluated for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the ED (MAge = 62.01, SDAge = 13.55; 49.49% male) and who arrived with close others (i.e. spouse/partner, child) or non-close others (e.g. neighbour). Patients self-reported support from companions and threat perceptions (in-ED and at recall approximately three days later).Main outcome measures: Positive support (comfort, responsiveness); negative support (made patients anxious, required comforting); threat perceptions (feeling helpless, vulnerable).Results: Close (vs non-close) others provided patients with marginally more positive support, but also required more comfort, B = 0.32, p = .050, and caused patients more anxiety, B = 0.24, p = .009. Anxiety was associated with patients' Threat Perceptions: in-ED, B = 0.11, p = .002; recall, B = 0.14, p < .001; as was provision of comfort to support partners: recall, B = .06, p = .005.Conclusion: Negative support may be one mechanism underlying the association between close others and patient distress in the ED.

SUBMITTER: Cornelius T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6980514 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The impact of support provided by close others in the emergency department on threat perceptions.

Cornelius Talea T   Derby Lilly L   Dong Melissa M   Edmondson Donald D  

Psychology & health 20190721 4


<b>Objective:</b> Having close others present in the emergency department (ED) can cause patients significant distress. The present study tested the hypothesis that close others provide more negative support than non-close others as a potential explanation for this effect.<b>Design:</b> Participants were 493 patients evaluated for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the ED (<i>M<sub>Age</sub></i> = 62.01, <i>SD<sub>Age</sub></i> = 13.55; 49.49% male) and who arrived with close others (i.e. spous  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6353683 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6185758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3047829 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6292565 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6407636 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11378599 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6350991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6335085 | biostudies-literature
2020-01-01 | GSE119217 | GEO
| S-EPMC6180915 | biostudies-literature