Dataset Information

Incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To investigate the incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception (LP) under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.

Methods

Eighty-five consecutive patients received standard phacoemulsification combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under sub-Tenon's anesthesia. At several checkpoints during the surgery (the end of phacoemulsification, the end of vitrectomy, and the end of surgery), participants were interviewed about whether they had LP or not after removing the influence of contralateral eye and the photo-bleaching effect. In patients treated with retinal photocoagulation, visual experience on laser flashes was evaluated.

Results

Under routine draping, no patients reported loss of LP at all the checkpoints. When the contralateral eye was tightly covered, the rates of LP loss were 84.7%, 97.6%, and 87.1% at the end of phacoemulsification, the end of vitrectomy, and the end of surgery, respectively. When the photo-bleaching effect was also removed, the rates of LP loss were 61.2%, 82.4%, and 56.5% at each checkpoint, respectively, and there were 87.1% (74/85) of patients reporting visual loss in at least one checkpoint. In addition, 76.9% (50/65) of patients could not feel laser flashes during retinal photocoagulation.

Conclusion

Intraoperative loss of LP under sub-Tenon's anesthesia was a relatively common and reversible event. The conduction block of optic nerve by anesthetic mainly contributed to the visual loss during surgery. Photo-bleaching effect also has some effect on the LP evaluation. Surgeons need to inform and counsel the patients about the intraoperative loss of LP, to prevent any sudden panic attacks in them.

SUBMITTER: Zheng D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7002683 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.

Zheng Dezhi D Huang Zijing Z Zhang Guihua G Huang Dingguo D Lin Guoqiao G Chen Weiqi W

Eye (London, England) 20190620 11

<h4>Purpose</h4>To investigate the incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception (LP) under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.<h4>Methods</h4>Eighty-five consecutive patients received standard phacoemulsification combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under sub-Tenon's anesthesia. At several checkpoints during the surgery (the end of phacoemulsification, the end of vitrectomy, and the end of surgery), participants were interviewed about whether they ...[more]

PMID: 31222136

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative pain is a possible complication of neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. There is little information available about its incidence, risk factors and physician perception.MethodsParturients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled. Before surgery, parturients were asked about preoperative anxiety on a verbal numerical scale (VNS), anticipated analgesic requirement, postoperative pain levels, Spielberger STATE-TRAIT inventory index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale. After surgery, parturients were asked to answer questions (intraoperative VNS pain). The anaesthesiologist and obstetrician were asked to fill out a questionnaire asking about perceived intraoperative pain. Influence of preoperative anxiety on intraoperative pain (yes/no) was assessed using logistic regression. Mc Fadden's R2 was calculated. The agreement in physician perception of intraoperative pain with reported pain by the parturient was examined by calculating Cohen's kappa and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI).ResultsWe included 193 parturients in our analysis. Incidence of intraoperative pain was 11.9%. Median intraoperative VNS pain of parturients with pain was 4.0 (1st quartile 4.0; 3rd quartile 9.0). Preoperative anxiety was not a good predictor of intraoperative pain (p-value of β-coefficient = 0.43, Mc Fadden's R2 = 0.01). Including further preoperative variables did not result in a good prediction model. Cohen's kappa between reported pain by parturient and by the obstetrician was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.41) and by the anaesthesiologist was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.48).ConclusionsWe found a substantial incidence (11.9%) of intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery. Preoperative anxiety did not predict intraoperative pain. Physicians did not accurately identify parturients' intraoperative pain.SignificanceIntraoperative pain occurred in 11.9% and severe intraoperative pain occurred in 1.11% of parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. We did not find any preoperative variables that could reliably predict intraoperative pain. Obstetricians and anaesthesiologists underestimated the incidence of intraoperative pain in our cohort and thus, more attention must be put to parturients' pain.

Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative hypotension (IOH) is well-described in the academic setting but not in community practice. IOH is associated with risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. This is the first report of IOH in the community setting using the IOH measure definition from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System program.ObjectivesTo describe the incidence of IOH in the community setting; assess variation in IOH by patient-, procedure-, and facility-level characteristics; and describe variation in risk-adjusted IOH across clinicians.MethodsDesign Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of retrospective data from anesthesia records in 2020 and 2021. Setting Forty-five facilities affiliated with two large anesthesia providers in the USA. Participants Patients aged 18 years or older having non-emergent, non-cardiac surgery under general, neuraxial, or regional anesthesia. Cases were excluded based on criteria for the IOH measure: baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg prior to anesthesia induction; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I, V, or VI; monitored anesthesia care only; deliberate induced hypotension; obstetric non-operative procedures; liver or lung transplant; cataract surgery; non-invasive gastrointestinal cases. Main outcomes IOH, using four definitions. Primary definition: binary assessment of whether the case had MAP < 65 mmHg for 15 min or more. Secondary definitions: total number of minutes of MAP < 65 mmHg, total area under MAP of 65 mmHg, time-weighted average MAP < 65 mmHg.ResultsAmong 127,095 non-emergent, non-cardiac cases in community anesthesia settings, 29% had MAP < 65 mmHg for at least 15 min cumulatively, with an overall mean of 12.4 min < 65 mmHg. IOH was slightly more common in patients who were younger, female, and ASA II (versus III or IV); in procedures that were longer and had higher anesthesia base units; and in ambulatory surgery centers. Incidence of IOH varied widely across individual clinicians in both unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses.ConclusionIntraoperative hypotension is common in community anesthesia practice, including among patients and settings typically considered "low risk." Variation in incidence across clinicians remains after risk-adjustment, suggesting that IOH is a modifiable risk worth pursuing in quality improvement initiatives.

Project description:BackgroundGeneral anesthesia leads to different effects depending on the drugs used (hypnosis, analgesia, muscle relaxation). While there are validated methods for clinical monitoring and control of hypnosis and muscle relaxation in routine anesthesia, the assessment of analgesia is still mainly based on the interpretation of clinical vital parameters, such as heart rate, blood pressure, perspiration or intraoperative movements of the patient. The present clinical study investigated whether the use of a so-called nociception monitor to record the intraoperative need for analgesics is superior to the previous analysis of vital parameters. The analgesia nociception index (ANI; MDoloris, Lille, France) was used, which is one of several nociception monitors currently on the market for recording the sympathicovagal balance. In the case of the ANI, the measurement is based on the analysis of the heart rate variability (HRV) as a function of breathing. The index is given in the form of a dimensionless score between 0 and 100, where 0 stands for a lack of parasympathetic activity and 100 for a very strong parasympathetic activity. According to the manufacturer, a value between 50-70 under anesthesia corresponds to sufficient intraoperative analgesia.MethodsThis was a clinical prospective randomized study in which 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy under balanced anesthesia using propofol, fentanyl and atracurium for induction and sevoflurane and fentanyl for anesthesia maintenance, were divided into two groups. In the intervention group (ANI group), during the operation analgesics were administered with the aid of the ANI monitor (bolus of 0.1 mg fentanyl if the ANI was < 50), whereas in the comparison group analgesics were administered according to previous clinical parameters (vital parameters, intraoperative defensive movements). The groups were then compared with respect to intraoperative fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), postoperative pain and opioid-induced side effects (measured by the numeric rating scale [NRS]) as well as patient satisfaction on postoperative day 3 (secondary outcome).ResultsThe observations showed a higher total intraoperative consumption of fentanyl in the intervention group, due to a significantly higher number of individual doses (0.54 vs. 0.44 mg, p < 0.001). With respect to the other observation points, there were hardly any differences between the groups, neither with respect to the pain score nor the side effects in the recovery room. At most there was a trend towards a slightly lower pain score at the first measurement point in the recovery room (NRS at 15 min). In the patient survey on the postoperative day 3, there was a difference with respect to the subjectively described reduction in vigilance in the ANI group, but not other side effects or overall satisfaction with the pain therapy.ConclusionIn this group of patients the additional use of the ANI monitor for intraoperative control of analgesia led to an increased consumption of fentanyl compared to the comparison group, without having an impact on the postoperative pain score, opioid-induced side effects or patient satisfaction. An optimization of pain therapy through intraoperative use of the ANI monitoring in hysterectomy patients under balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl could therefore not be proven. Transferability of the results to a much older and/or sicker patient collective remains questionable.

Project description:AimTo compare the efficacy and safety of trans-sub-Tenon's ciliary nerve block anesthesia and transcutaneous retrobulbar anesthesia in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).MethodsA prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was conducted at Zhongda Hospital, Affiliated with Southeast University, from February 2021 to October 2021. Patients undergoing PPV were randomly allocated into two groups: the trans-sub-Tenon's anesthesia group (ST group) and the retrobulbar anesthesia group (RB group) in the ratio of 1:1. The ST group received 2 ml ropivacaine through the Tenon capsule to the retrobulbar space, while the RB group received 2 ml ropivacaine via transcutaneous retrobulbar injection. Visual analog score (VAS) was used to evaluate pain during the whole process, including during anesthesia implementation, intraoperatively and on the first day after the operation. Movement evaluation (Brahma scores) and anesthesia-related complications were also noted.ResultsFinally, a total of 120 patients were included in the study (60 in the ST group and 60 in the RB group). There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics or surgical features between the two groups. The VAS pain scores for anesthesia implementation were 0.52 ± 0.47 in the ST group and 1.83 ± 0.87 in the RB group (P < 0.001). The VAS scores during the operation were 0.53 ± 0.49 in the ST group and 1.48 ± 1.02 in the RB group (P < 0.001) and those on the first day after the operation were 0.37 ± 0.38 in the ST group and 0.81 ± 0.80 in the RB group (P = 0.002). No patients required supplemental intravenous anesthesia intraoperatively. The Brahma movement scores were 0.70 ± 1.64 in the ST group (scores ranging from 0 to 8) and 2.38 ± 3.15 in the RB group (ranging from 0 to 12) (P = 0.001). Forty-two patients in each group received laser photocoagulation during surgery. Fifteen patients (36%) in the ST group could not see the flashes of the laser, compared to 8 patients (19%) in the RB group (P = 0.087). No serious sight-threatening or life-threatening complications related to anesthesia were observed in either group.ConclusionsFor PPV, trans-sub-Tenon's ciliary nerve block anesthesia was more effective in controlling pain than transcutaneous retrobulbar anesthesia during the whole surgery process, including during anesthesia implementation, intraoperatively and on the first day after the operation. Additionally, it could achieve better effect of akinesia and was relatively safe. Trans-sub-Tenon's anesthesia could be considered an alternative form of local anesthesia during vitreoretinal procedures.Trial registrationThe study protocol has been registered at ChiCTR.org.cn on February 2021 under the number ChiCTR2100043109 .

Dataset Information

Incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Incidence and impact factors of intraoperative loss of light perception under sub-Tenon's anesthesia in patients with macular diseases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets