Dataset Information

An Outcome Assessment of a Single Institution's Longitudinal Experience with Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastasis.

ABSTRACT: There is no FDA-approved treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) and overall outcomes are generally poor for those who develop liver metastasis. We performed a retrospective single-institution chart review on consecutive series of UM patients with liver metastasis who were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between 1971-1993 (Cohort 1, n = 80), 1998-2007 (Cohort 2, n = 198), and 2008-2017 (Cohort 3, n = 452). In total, 70% of patients in Cohort 1 received only systemic therapies as their treatment modality for liver metastasis, while 98% of patients in Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 received liver-directed treatment either alone or with systemic therapy. Median Mets-to-Death OS was shortest in Cohort 1 (5.3 months, 95% CI: 4.2-7.0), longer in Cohort 2 (13.6 months, 95% CI: 12.2-16.6) and longest in Cohort 3 (17.8 months, 95% CI: 16.6-19.4). Median Eye Tx-to-Death OS was shortest in Cohort 1 (40.8 months, 95% CI: 37.1-56.9), and similar in Cohort 2 (62.6 months, 95% CI: 54.6-71.5) and Cohort 3 (59.4 months, 95% CI: 56.2-64.7). It is speculated that this could be due to the shift of treatment modalities from DTIC-based chemotherapy to liver-directed therapies. Combination of liver-directed and newly developed systemic treatments may further improve the survival of these patients.

SUBMITTER: Seedor RS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7016993 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An Outcome Assessment of a Single Institution's Longitudinal Experience with Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastasis.

Seedor Rino S RS Eschelman David J DJ Gonsalves Carin F CF Adamo Robert D RD Orloff Marlana M Amjad Anjum A Sharpe-Mills Erin E Chervoneva Inna I Shields Carol L CL Shields Jerry A JA Mastrangelo Michael J MJ Sato Takami T

Cancers 20200101 1

There is no FDA-approved treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) and overall outcomes are generally poor for those who develop liver metastasis. We performed a retrospective single-institution chart review on consecutive series of UM patients with liver metastasis who were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between 1971-1993 (Cohort 1, n = 80), 1998-2007 (Cohort 2, n = 198), and 2008-2017 (Cohort 3, n = 452). In total, 70% of patients in Cohort 1 received o ...[more]

PMID: 31906411

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) in the liver usually die within 1 year. The development of new treatments for MUM has been limited by the lack of diverse MUM cell lines and appropriate animal models. We previously reported that orthotopic xenograft mouse models established by direct injection of MUM cells into the liver were useful for the analysis associated with tumor microenvironment in the liver. However, considering that patients with UM metastasize to the liver hematogenously, direct liver injection model might not be suitable for investigation on various mechanisms of liver metastasis. Here, we aim to establish new orthotopic xenograft models via hematogenous dissemination of tumor cells to the liver, and to compare their characteristics with the hepatic injection model. We also determine if hepatic tumors could be effectively monitored with non-invasive live imaging. METHODS:tdtTomate-labeled, patient-derived MUM cells were injected into the liver, spleen or tail vein of immunodeficient NSG mice. Tumor growth was serially assessed with In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) images once every week. Established hepatic tumors were evaluated with CT scan and then analyzed histologically. RESULTS:We found that splenic injection could consistently establish hepatic tumors. Non-invasive imaging showed that the splenic injection model had more consistent and stronger fluorescent intensity compared to the hepatic injection model. There were no significant differences in tumor growth between splenic injection with splenectomy and without splenectomy. The splenic injection established hepatic tumors diffusely throughout the liver, while the hepatic injection of tumor cells established a single localized tumor. Long-term monitoring of tumor development showed that tumor growth, tumor distribution in the liver, and overall survival depended on the number of tumor cells injected to the spleen. CONCLUSION:We established a new orthotopic hepatic metastatic xenograft mouse model by splenic injection of MUM cells. The growth of orthotopic hepatic tumors could be monitored with non-invasive IVIS imaging. Moreover, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of a MEK inhibitor by using this model. Our findings suggest that our new orthotopic liver metastatic mouse model may be useful for preclinical drug screening experiments and for the analysis of liver metastasis mechanisms.

Dataset Information

An Outcome Assessment of a Single Institution's Longitudinal Experience with Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastasis.

Publications

An Outcome Assessment of a Single Institution's Longitudinal Experience with Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastasis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets