Evaluating malaria programmes in moderate- and low-transmission settings: practical ways to generate robust evidence.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Many countries have made substantial progress in scaling-up and sustaining malaria intervention coverage, leading to more focalized and heterogeneous transmission in many settings. Evaluation provides valuable information for programmes to understand if interventions have been implemented as planned and with quality, if the programme had the intended impact on malaria burden, and to guide programmatic decision-making. Low-, moderate-, and heterogeneous-transmission settings present unique evaluation challenges because of dynamic and targeted intervention strategies. This paper provides illustration of evaluation approaches and methodologies for these transmission settings, and suggests how to answer evaluation questions specific to the local context. METHODS:The Roll Back Malari

SUBMITTER: Ashton RA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7027277 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature