On brain atlas choice and automatic segmentation methods: a comparison of MAPER & FreeSurfer using three atlas databases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Several automatic image segmentation methods and few atlas databases exist for analysing structural T1-weighted magnetic resonance brain images. The impact of choosing a combination has not hitherto been described but may bias comparisons across studies. We evaluated two segmentation methods (MAPER and FreeSurfer), using three publicly available atlas databases (Hammers_mith, Desikan-Killiany-Tourville, and MICCAI 2012 Grand Challenge). For each combination of atlas and method, we conducted a leave-one-out cross-comparison to estimate the segmentation accuracy of FreeSurfer and MAPER. We also used each possible combination to segment two datasets of patients with known structural abnormalities (Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (HS)) and
SUBMITTER: Yaakub SN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7028906 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA