Dataset Information

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with ¹⁵O-water PET.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We compared quantification of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with a 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT to ¹⁵O-water PET.

Methods

SPECT MBF for thirty patients in the WATERDAY study was re-analyzed by QPET software with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function. ¹⁵O-water PET MBF was re-quantified using dedicated software. Inter-operator variability was assessed using repeatability coefficients (RPC).

Results

Significant correlations were observed between global (r = 0.91, P < 0.001) and regional MBF (r = 0.86, P < 0.001) with SPECT compared to PET. Global MBF (rest 0.95 vs 1.05 ml/min/g, P = 0.07; stress 2.62 vs 2.68 mL/min/g, P = 0.17) and MFR (2.65 vs 2.75, P = 0.86) were similar between SPECT and PET. Rest (0.81 vs 0.98 mL/min/g, P = 0.03) and stress MBF (1.98 vs 2.61 mL/min/g, P = 0.01) in right coronary artery (RCA) were lower with SPECT compared to PET. However, MFR in the RCA territory was similar (2.54 vs 2.77, P = 0.21). The SPECT-PET RPC for global MBFs and MFR were 0.95 mL/min/g and 0.94, with inter-observer RPC of 0.59 mL/min/g and 0.74, respectively.

Conclusions

MBF and MFR derived from CZT-SPECT with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function showed good agreement with ¹⁵O-water PET, as well as low inter-operator variability.

SUBMITTER: Otaki Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7042031 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with <sup>15</sup>O-water PET.

Otaki Yuka Y Manabe Osamu O Miller Robert J H RJH Manrique Alain A Nganoa Catherine C Roth Nathaniel N Berman Daniel S DS Germano Guido G Slomka Piotr J PJ Agostini Denis D

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 20190826 4

<h4>Background</h4>We compared quantification of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with a 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT to <sup>15</sup>O-water PET.<h4>Methods</h4>SPECT MBF for thirty patients in the WATERDAY study was re-analyzed by QPET software with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function. <sup>15</sup>O-water PET MBF was re-quantified using dedicated software. Inter-operator variability was assessed using repeatability coefficients (RPC).<h4>Results</h4>Signif ...[more]

PMID: 31452085

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatient motion can lead to misalignment of left ventricular (LV) volumes-of-interest (VOIs) and subsequently inaccurate quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) from dynamic PET myocardial perfusion images. We aimed to develop an image-based 3D-automated motion-correction algorithm that corrects the full dynamic sequence for translational motion, especially in the early blood phase frames (~ first minute) where the injected tracer activity is transitioning from the blood pool to the myocardium and where conventional image registration algorithms have had limited success.MethodsWe studied 225 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic rest/stress rubidium-82 chloride (82Rb) PET imaging. Dynamic image series consisting of 30 frames were reconstructed with frame durations ranging from 5 to 80 seconds. An automated algorithm localized the RV and LV blood pools in space and time and then registered each frame to a tissue reference image volume using normalized gradient fields with a modification of a signed distance function. The computed shifts and their global and regional flow estimates were compared to those of reference shifts that were assessed by three physician readers.ResultsThe automated motion-correction shifts were within 5 mm of the manual motion-correction shifts across the entire sequence. The automated and manual motion-correction global MBF values had excellent linear agreement (R = 0.99, y = 0.97x + 0.06). Uncorrected flows outside of the limits of agreement with the manual motion-corrected flows were brought into agreement in 90% of the cases for global MBF and in 87% of the cases for global MFR. The limits of agreement for stress MBF were also reduced twofold globally and by fourfold in the RCA territory.ConclusionsAn image-based, automated motion-correction algorithm for dynamic PET across the entire dynamic sequence using normalized gradient fields matched the results of manual motion correction in reducing bias and variance in MBF and MFR, particularly in the RCA territory.

Project description:BackgroundTo assess single-photon emission computed tomography cadmium-zinc-telluride (SPECT CZT)-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) flow reserve (MFR) and flow difference (FD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to compare this data with serum cardiac troponin and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings.MethodsA total of 31 patients with AMI underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), serial high-sensitivity serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measurement, and CZT SPECT with visual and quantitative (MBF, MFR, and FD) perfusion parameters, and contrast-enhanced CMR. All patients with AMI were divided into two groups: (1) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), n = 10; (2) with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD), n = 21.ResultsThe values of SSS and SRS were significantly (p < 0.01) higher whereas global stress MBF, MFR significantly lower in patients with MICAD as compared to MINOCA - 5.0 (3.0; 5.0) vs. 9.0 (5.0; 13.0); 2.0 (1.0; 3.0) vs. 6.0 (3.0; 11.0); 2.02 (1.71; 2.37) vs. 0.86 (0.72; 1.02) ml/min/g; and 2.61 (2.23; 3.14) vs. 1.67 (1.1; 1.9), respectively. Stress MBF correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; p = 0.03 and ρ = -0.47; p = 0.007, respectively. FD correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; p = 0.03 and ρ = -0.46; p = 0.009. CMR analysis showed that infarct size, MVO and myocardial edema in patients with MICAD were significantly (< 0.05) higher as compared to MINOCA: 19.4 (10.4; 29.7) vs. 1.8 (0.0; 6.9); 0.1 (0.0; 0.7) vs. 0.0 (0.0; 0.0) and 19.5 (12.0;30.0) vs. 3.0 (0.0; 12.0), respectively. According to vessel-based analysis of CMR data, acute myocardial injury (defined as late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial edema) was observed more frequently in patients with MICAD compared to MINOCA: 34(37%) vs. 5(5%) p = 0.005, respectively. The values of regional stress MBF, MFR and FD were significantly decreased in LV territories characterized by myocardial injury compared to those without: 0.98 (0.73; 1.79) vs. 1.33 (0.94; 2.08) p < 0.01, 1.64 (1.0; 2.36) vs. 2.0 (1.53; 2.89) p < 0.01 and 0.33 (0.05; 0.57) vs. 0.56 (0.36; 1.32) p> 0.01, respectively.ConclusionIn patients with AMI, SPECT CZT-derived flow measures were associated with the high-sensitivity troponin I as well as the extent of edema, microvascular obstruction, and infarct size detected by CMR. On the regional level, quantitative SPECT CZT measures were significantly lower in vessel territories characterized by myocardial injury.

Project description:The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement in patients referred for dynamic SPECT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. SPECT data were acquired on a cadmium zinc telluride-based pinhole cardiac camera in list mode using a stress (251 ± 15 MBq)/rest (512 ± 26 MBq) 1-d 99mTc-tetrofosmin protocol. Kinetic analyses were done with software using a 1-tissue-compartment model and converted to MBF using a previously determined extraction fraction correction. MFR was analyzed and compared globally and regionally. Motion detection was applied, but not attenuation correction. Results: In total, 124 patients (64 male, 60 female) were included, and SPECT acquisitions were twice reconstructed by the same nuclear medicine board-certified physician for 50 patients and by 2 different physicians for 74. Both intra- and interobserver measurements of global MFR had no significant bias (-0.01 [P = 0.94] and 0.01 [P = 0.67], respectively). However, rest MBF and stress MBF were significantly different in global left ventricular evaluation (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and in the anterior territory (P < 0.0001) on interuser analysis. The average coefficient of variation was 15%-30% of the mean stress MBF if the analysis was performed by the same physician or 2 different physicians and was around 20% of the mean MFR independently of the processing physician. Using the MFR threshold of 2, we noticed good intrauser agreement, whereas it was moderate when the users were different (κ = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94] vs. 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36-0.75], respectively). Conclusion: Repeated measurements of global MFR by the same physician or 2 different physicians were similar, with an average coefficient of variation of 20%. Better reproducibility was achieved for intrauser MBF evaluation. Automation of processing is needed to improve reproducibility.

Dataset Information

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with ¹⁵O-water PET.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with <sup>15</sup>O-water PET.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with 15O-water PET.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with <sup>15</sup>O-water PET.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with ¹⁵O-water PET.