Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?

ABSTRACT: Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore, accurately judging study type is the first priority, and the choosing proper tool is also important. In this review, we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized controlled trial (including individual and cluster), animal study, non-randomized interventional studies (including follow-up study, controlled before-and-after study, before-after/ pre-post study, uncontrolled longitudinal study, interrupted time series study), cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study (including analytical and descriptive), observational case series and case reports, comparative effectiveness research, diagnostic study, health economic evaluation, prediction study

SUBMITTER: Ma LL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7049186 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature