Language effects on bargaining.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Language is critical to coordination in groups. Though, how language affects coordination in groups is not well understood. We prime distributive and integrative language in a bargaining experiment to better understand the links between group outcomes and communication. We accomplish this by priming interests or positions language in randomized groups. We find that priming positions as opposed to interests language leads to agreements where controllers, subjects with unilateral authority over the group outcome, receive a larger share of the benefits but where the total benefits to the group are unaffected. In contrast to common justifications for the use of integrative language in bargaining, our experimental approach revealed no significant differences between priming interests and positi
SUBMITTER: Weir MJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7051044 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA