Reliability and discriminative accuracy of 5 measures for craniocaudal humeral position: an assessment on conventional radiographs.

ABSTRACT:

Hypothesis

This study aimed to examine the reliability and diagnostic discriminative accuracy of 5 different methods that quantity the craniocaudal humeral position with respect to the scapula on conventional radiographs.

Methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study, 2 observers randomly assessed the conventional anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 280 subjects with rotator cuff imaging for the (1) acromiohumeral (AH) interval, (2) upward migration index (UMI), (3) glenohumeral center-to-center measurement (GHCC), (4) glenohumeral arc measurement (GHa), and (5) scapular spine-humeral head center method (SHC). Reliability was assessed by means of relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient) and absolute consistency. Discriminative accuracy

SUBMITTER: Kolk A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7075771 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature