Dataset Information

Autoantibody Reversion: Changing Risk Categories in Multiple-Autoantibody-Positive Individuals.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Most individuals with two or more islet autoantibodies progress to clinical type 1 diabetes. However, in some individuals, autoantibodies are subsequently lost. Here, our objectives were to determine the frequency of autoantibody loss (reversion) in multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals and to determine the association between reversion and progression to clinical disease.

Research design and methods

We analyzed multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals participating in TrialNet's Pathway to Prevention Study for reversion and determined the effect of reversion on progression to clinical disease using a Cox regression analysis.

Results

Of 3,284 multiple-autoantibody-positive subjects, reversion occurred in 134 (4.1%) and was associated with reduced incidence of clinical disease. Reversion occurred more frequently with older age, lower autoantibody titers, and fewer positive autoantibodies.

Conclusions

Although reversion of multiple-autoantibody positivity is rare, when it occurs, the risk of progressing to clinical disease is reduced. This suggests unknown mechanisms promoting immune remission in some individuals.

SUBMITTER: So M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7085807 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Autoantibody Reversion: Changing Risk Categories in Multiple-Autoantibody-Positive Individuals.

So Michelle M O'Rourke Colin C Bahnson Henry T HT Greenbaum Carla J CJ Speake Cate C

Diabetes care 20200204 4

<h4>Objective</h4>Most individuals with two or more islet autoantibodies progress to clinical type 1 diabetes. However, in some individuals, autoantibodies are subsequently lost. Here, our objectives were to determine the frequency of autoantibody loss (reversion) in multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals and to determine the association between reversion and progression to clinical disease.<h4>Research design and methods</h4>We analyzed multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals participati ...[more]

PMID: 32019856

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aims/hypothesisMany studies of type 1 diabetes pathogenesis focus on individuals with high-risk HLA haplotypes. We tested the hypothesis that, among islet autoantibody-positive individuals, lacking HLA-DRB1*04-DQA1*03-DQB1*0302 (HLA-DR4-DQ8) and/or HLA-DRB1*0301-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 (HLA-DR3-DQ2) is associated with phenotypic differences, compared with those who have these high-risk HLA haplotypes.MethodsWe classified autoantibody-positive relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes into four groups based on having both HLA-DR4-DQ8 and HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR3/DR4; n=1263), HLA-DR4-DQ8 but not HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR4/non-DR3; n=2340), HLA-DR3-DQ2 but not HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4; n=1607) and neither HLA-DR3-DQ2 nor HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DRX/DRX; n=1294). Group comparisons included demographics, metabolic markers and the prevalence of autoantibodies against GAD65 (GADA%), IA-2 (IA-2A%) or insulin (IAA%) at enrolment. A p value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.ResultsIA-2A% was lower in the DRX/DRX group (20.9%) than in the DR4/non-DR3 (38.5%, p<0.001) and DR3/DR4 (44.8%, p<0.001) groups, but similar to the DR3/non-DR4 group (20.0%). Conversely, IAA% was similar in the DRX/DRX (43.4%), DR4/non-DR3 (41.1%) and DR3/DR4 (41.0%) groups, but lower in the DR3/non-DR4 group (30.1%, p<0.001). Participants in the DRX/DRX group were older, with a lower prevalence of White participants and a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, and higher preserved C-peptide (as measured by a lower Index60) than those in the DR3/DR4 group (all comparisons, p<0.005), a lower prevalence of White or non-Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR4/non-DR3 group, and younger age, a higher prevalence of Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR3/non-DR4 group (all comparisons, p<0.005). Among the 1292 participants who progressed to clinical type 1 diabetes, those in the DR3/non-DR4 group had higher GADA%, lower IA-2A% and lower IAA% than the other groups (all comparisons, p<0.01), and those in the DR3/DR4 group had the youngest age at diagnosis (all comparisons, p<0.001).Conclusions/interpretationAutoantibody-positive individuals who lack both high-risk HLA haplotypes (DRX/DRX) or have HLA-DR3-DQ2 but lack HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4) have phenotypic differences compared with DR3/DR4 and DR4/non-DR3 individuals, suggesting that there is aetiological heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes.

Project description:ObjectiveAntinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are detected in ∼18% of females, yet autoimmune disease develops in only 5-8%. Immunologic differences between ANA-positive healthy individuals and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may elucidate the regulatory mechanisms by which ANA-positive individuals avoid transition to clinical autoimmune disease.MethodsHealthy individuals (n = 790) were screened for autoantibodies specific for 11 antigens associated with lupus, systemic sclerosis, and Sjögren's syndrome. From this screening, 31 European American ANA-positive healthy individuals were selected and demographically matched to ANA-negative controls and SLE patients. Serum cytokine profiles, leukocyte subset frequency, and reactivity were analyzed by multiplex assays, immunophenotyping, and phosphospecific flow cytometry.ResultsOf 790 individuals screened, 57 (7%) were ANA-positive. The majority of proinflammatory cytokines, including interferon-γ (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-17 (IL-17), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, exhibited a stepwise increase in serum levels from ANA-negative controls to ANA-positive healthy individuals to SLE patients (P < 0.0001). IFNα, IFNβ, IL-12p40, and stem cell factor/c-Kit ligand were increased in SLE patients only (P < 0.05). B lymphocyte stimulator (BlyS) was elevated in SLE patients but decreased in ANA-positive individuals (P < 0.001). Further, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) was down-regulated in SLE patients only (P < 0.0001). ANA-positive individuals had increased frequencies of monocytes, memory B cells, and plasmablasts and increased levels of pSTAT-1 and pSTAT-3 following IFNα stimulation compared with ANA-negative controls (P < 0.05).ConclusionANA-positive healthy individuals exhibit dysregulation in multiple immune pathways yet differ from SLE patients by the absence of elevated IFNs, BLyS, IL-12p40, and stem cell factor/c-Kit ligand. Further, severely decreased levels of IL-1Ra in SLE patients compared with ANA-positive individuals may contribute to disease development. These results highlight the importance of IFN-related pathways and regulatory elements in SLE pathogenesis.

Dataset Information

Autoantibody Reversion: Changing Risk Categories in Multiple-Autoantibody-Positive Individuals.

Objective

Research design and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Autoantibody Reversion: Changing Risk Categories in Multiple-Autoantibody-Positive Individuals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets