Dataset Information

Comparison of Exercise Performance and Clinical Outcome Between Functional Complete and Incomplete Revascularization.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended to improve symptoms in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), improvement of exercise performance is controversial. This study aimed to investigate changes in exercise duration after PCI according to functional completeness of revascularization by comparing pre- and post-PCI exercise stress test (EST). METHODS:Patients with SIHD were enrolled from a prospective PCI registry, and divided into 2 groups: 1) functional complete revascularization (CR) group had a positive EST before PCI and negative EST after PCI, 2) functional incomplete revascularization (IR) group had positive EST before and after PCI. Primary outcome was change in exercise duration after PCI and secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of any death, any myocardial infarction, and any ischemia-driven revascularization) at 3 years after PCI. RESULTS:A total of 256 patients (149 for CR group, and 107 for IR group) were eligible for analysis. Before PCI, exercise duration was not significantly different between the functional CR and IR groups (median 540 [interquartile range; IQR, 414, 602] vs. 480 [402, 589] seconds, p=0.091). After PCI, however, the CR group had a significantly higher increment of exercise duration than the IR group (median 62.0 [IQR, 12.0, 141.0] vs. 30.0 [-11.0, 103.5] seconds, p=0.011). The functional CR group also had a significantly lower risk of 3-year MACE (6.2% vs. 26.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.41; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Functional CR showed a higher increment of exercise duration than functional IR.

SUBMITTER: Kim J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7098823 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Exercise Performance and Clinical Outcome Between Functional Complete and Incomplete Revascularization.

Kim Jihoon J Lee Joo Myung JM Choi Seung Hyuk SH Choi Ki Hong KH Park Taek Kyu TK Park Sung Ji SJ Yang Jeong Hoon JH Song Young Bin YB Hahn Joo Yong JY Jang Mi Ja MJ Koo Bon Kwon BK Gwon Hyeon Cheol HC

Korean circulation journal 20200120 5

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended to improve symptoms in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), improvement of exercise performance is controversial. This study aimed to investigate changes in exercise duration after PCI according to functional completeness of revascularization by comparing pre- and post-PCI exercise stress test (EST).<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with SIHD were enrolled from a prospective PCI registry, and ...[more]

PMID: 32096361

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether complete revascularization (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) may affect long-term outcomes after PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is unclear.ObjectivesThe authors sought to assess the impact of CR or IR on 10-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for LMCA disease.MethodsIn the PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) 10-year extended study, the authors evaluated the effect of PCI and CABG on long-term outcomes according to completeness of revascularization. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of mortality from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization).ResultsAmong 600 randomized patients (PCI, n = 300 and CABG, n = 300), 416 patients (69.3%) had CR and 184 (30.7%) had IR; 68.3% of PCI patients and 70.3% of CABG patients underwent CR, respectively. The 10-year MACCE rates were not significantly different between PCI and CABG among patients with CR (27.8% vs 25.1%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.81-1.73) and among those with IR (31.6% vs 21.3%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.92-2.92) (P for interaction = 0.35). There was also no significant interaction between the status of CR and the relative effect of PCI and CABG on all-cause mortality, serious composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and repeat revascularization.ConclusionsIn this 10-year follow-up of PRECOMBAT, the authors found no significant difference between PCI and CABG in the rates of MACCE and all-cause mortality according to CR or IR status. (Ten-Year Outcomes of PRE-COMBAT Trial [PRECOMBAT], NCT03871127; PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery Versus AngioplasTy Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT], NCT00422968).

Project description:ImportanceMany studies have compared outcomes for incomplete revascularization (IR) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but little is known about whether outcomes are related to the nature of the IR.ObjectiveTo determine whether some coronary vessel characteristics are associated with worse outcomes in patients with PCI with IR.Design, setting, and participantsNew York's PCI registry was used to examine mortality (median follow-up, 3.4 years) as a function of the number of vessels that were incompletely revascularized, the stenosis in those vessels, and whether the proximal left anterior descending artery was incompletely revascularized after controlling for other factors associated with mortality for patients with and without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This was a multicenter study (all nonfederal PCI hospitals in New York State) that included 41 639 New York residents with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI in New York State between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012.ExposuresPercutaneous coronary interventions, with complete and incomplete revascularization.Main outcomes and measuresMedium-term mortality.ResultsFor patients with STEMI, the mean age was 62.8 years; 26.2% were women, 11.9% were Hispanic, and 81.5% were white. For other patients, the mean age was 66.6 years, 29.1% were women, 11.3% were Hispanic, and 79.1% were white. Incomplete revascularization was very common (78% among patients with STEMI and 71% among other patients). Patients with IR in a vessel with at least 90% stenosis were at higher risk than other patients with IR. This was not significant among patients with STEMI (17.18% vs 12.86%; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.99-1.37) and significant among patients without STEMI (17.71% vs 12.96%; AHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24). Similarly, patients with IR in 2 or more vessels had higher mortality than patients with completely revascularization and higher mortality than other patients with IR among patients with STEMI (20.37% vs 14.39%; AHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15-1.59) and among patients without STEMI (20.10% vs 12.86%; AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09-1.59). Patients with proximal left anterior descending artery vessel IR had higher mortality than other patients with IR (20.09% vs 14.67%; AHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64 for patients with STEMI and 20.78% vs 15.62%; AHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23 for patients without STEMI). More than 20% of all PCI patients had IR of 2 or more vessels and more than 30% had IR with more than 90% stenosis.Conclusions and relevancePatients with IR are at higher risk of mortality if they have IR with at least 90% stenosis, IR in 2 or more vessels, or proximal left anterior descending IR.

Project description:Background Data are limited regarding long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct-related artery (IRA)-only PCI. Methods and Results Of 13 104 patients from the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry--National Institutes of Health) registry, we selected 659 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who had concomitant non-IRA stenosis and presented with cardiogenic shock. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Multivessel PCI was performed in 260 patients and IRA-only PCI in 399 patients. At 3 years, patients in the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94 [P=0.024]), all-cause death or MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84 [P=0.004]), and non-IRA repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.50 [P<0.001]) than those in the IRA-only PCI group. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis. Landmark analysis at 1 year demonstrated that the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of recurrent MI and non-IRA repeat revascularization beyond 1 year (log-rank P=0.030 and P=0.017, respectively) than the IRA-only PCI group. Conclusions In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death than IRA-only PCI at 3 years, suggesting potential benefit of non-IRA revascularization during the index hospitalization to improve long-term clinical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundHigh-intensity stepping practice may be a critical component to improve gait following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). However, such practice is discouraged by traditional theories of rehabilitation that suggest high-intensity locomotor exercise degrades gait performance. Accordingly, such training is thought to reinforce abnormal movement patterns, although evidence to support this notion is limited.ObjectiveThe purposes of this study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of short-term manipulations in locomotor intensity on gait performance in people with iSCI and (2) to evaluate potential detrimental effects of high-intensity locomotor training on walking performance.DesignA single-day, repeated-measures, pretraining-posttraining study design was used.MethodsNineteen individuals with chronic iSCI performed a graded-intensity locomotor exercise task with simultaneous collection of lower extremity kinematic and electromyographic data. Measures of interest were compared across intensity levels of 33%, 67%, and 100% of peak gait speed. A subset of 9 individuals participated in 12 weeks of high-intensity locomotor training. Similar measurements were collected and compared between pretraining and posttraining evaluations.ResultsThe results indicate that short-term increases in intensity led to significant improvements in muscle activity, spatiotemporal metrics, and joint excursions, with selected improvements in measures of locomotor coordination. High-intensity locomotor training led to significant increases in peak gait speed (0.64-0.80 m/s), and spatiotemporal and kinematic metrics indicate a trend for improved coordination.LimitationsMeasures of gait performance were assessed during treadmill ambulation and not compared with a control group. Generalizability of these results to overground ambulation is unknown.ConclusionsHigh-intensity locomotor exercise and training does not degrade, but rather improves, locomotor function and quality in individuals with iSCI, which contrasts with traditional theories of motor dysfunction following neurologic injury.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Exercise Performance and Clinical Outcome Between Functional Complete and Incomplete Revascularization.

Publications

Comparison of Exercise Performance and Clinical Outcome Between Functional Complete and Incomplete Revascularization.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets