Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Diagnostic assessment in giant cell arteritis (GCA) is rapidly changing as vascular imaging becomes more available. This study was undertaken to determine if clinical GCA subsets have distinct profiles or reflect differential diagnostic assessments.Methods
Patients were recruited from an international cohort and divided into 4 subsets based on a temporal artery (TA) abnormality (positive TA biopsy [TAB] or halo sign on TA ultrasound [TA-US]) and/or evidence of large vessel (LV) involvement on imaging: 1) both TA abnormality and LV involvement (TA+/LV+ GCA); 2) TA abnormality without LV involvement (TA+/LV- GCA); 3) LV involvement without TA abnormality (TA-/LV+ GCA); and 4) clinically diagnosed GCA without LV involvement or TA abnormality (TA-/LV- GCA).Results
SUBMITTER: Gribbons KB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7113106 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature