Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA GHET1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

A number of studies have demonstrated the critical role of long non-coding RNA gastric cancer high expressed transcript 1 (GHET1) in many cancers. This meta-analysis provides an evidence-based evaluation of the prognostic role of GHET1 in cancer.

Materials and methods

Literature searches were conducted in several databases including Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the role of GHET1 in cancer. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018111252).

Results

Sixteen studies, containing 1315 patients, were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that GHET1 overexpression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cancer. Moreover, up-regulation of GHET1 expression predicted larger tumor size, positive lymph node metastasis, positive distant metastasis, and advanced TNM (tumor-node-metastases) stage in human cancers.

Conclusion

There is a significant correlation between up-regulation of GHET1 and both poor prognosis and advanced clinicopathological cancer characteristics. GHET1 may be a potential prognostic predictor for human cancers.

SUBMITTER: Wang D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7137500 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA GHET1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Dingding D   Zhang Hong H   Fang Xiaolian X   Zhang Xue X   Liu Honggang H  

Cancer cell international 20200407


<h4>Background</h4>A number of studies have demonstrated the critical role of long non-coding RNA gastric cancer high expressed transcript 1 (GHET1) in many cancers. This meta-analysis provides an evidence-based evaluation of the prognostic role of GHET1 in cancer.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Literature searches were conducted in several databases including Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4193855 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5762581 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7478608 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8920262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8514773 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5725038 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9773142 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5464649 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7271165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8761471 | biostudies-literature