Dataset Information

Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA.

ABSTRACT: ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA (InBios International, Seattle, WA) recently replaced the ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA and a number of significant changes have been made to the original version. This study compares data generated from the ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA, to data generated using the original version of the kit. The same sample sets were used in this comparison, and reference test results for these samples were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of results across two laboratories. Average sensitivity increased from 90.4% to 92.5% with the updated kit where the increase was not statistically different, and specificity increased from 79.5% to 97.4%, a statistically-significant difference. Accuracy of the ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA was 89% compared to 63.9% for the original version of the kit, and agreement across the laboratories increased from 79.5% to 97.4%. With secondary dengue virus infections, specificity increased from 9.3% to 82.6% with the updated kit, primarily due to the change in interpretation criteria that no longer includes "Possible Zika positive."

SUBMITTER: Basile AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7176032 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA.

Basile Alison Jane AJ Ao Jingning J Horiuchi Kalanthe K Semenova Vera V Steward-Clark Evelene E Schiffer Jarad J

Journal of virological methods 20190607

ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA (InBios International, Seattle, WA) recently replaced the ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA and a number of significant changes have been made to the original version. This study compares data generated from the ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA, to data generated using the original version of the kit. The same sample sets were used in this comparison, and reference test results for these samples were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concorda ...[more]

PMID: 31181219

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cytauxzoonosis is a tick-borne infectious disease affecting domestic cats with high mortality and limited treatment modalities. Because early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are crucial to survival of infected cats, the objective of this study was to develop an ELISA capable of detecting cytauxzoonosis and differentiating acute vs. chronic infection in clinical feline blood samples. A microsphere immunoassay (MIA) was developed to evaluate the production of Cytauxzoon felis-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in serial plasma samples from cats with experimental C. felis infection by targeting a C. felis-specific transmembrane protein (c88). Recombinant c88 protein was utilized to develop indirect ELISAs to detect IgM and IgG antibodies in clinical plasma samples from: PCR-positive cats with acute C. felis infection (n = 36), C. felis-negative cats with pyrexia (n = 10), healthy C. felis-negative cats (n = 22), and chronic C. felis carriers (n = 4). Anti-c88 IgM antibodies were detectable at day 12 post-tick infestation in cats with experimental C. felis infection (within 24 hours of developing clinical signs), while anti-c88 IgG was detectable at day 15 post-tick infestation - indicating IgM could be used to detect early infection. Using a cut-off value of 19.85 percent positive, the C. felis IgM ELISA detected acute cytauxzoonosis in 94.44% (34/36) of cats presented with clinical signs of acute cytauxzoonosis with 100% specificity (indicating a "Strong Positive" result). When a lower cutoff of 8.60 percent positive was used, cytauxzoonosis was detected in the 2 remaining PCR-positive cats with 87.88% specificity (indicating of a "Weak Positive" result). One C. felis-negative, febrile cat had high IgG, and chronic carriers had variable IgM and IgG results. Combined interpretation of IgM and IgG ELISAs did not reliably differentiate acute vs. chronic infection. While further validation on assay performance is needed, the C. felis IgM ELISA is a promising test to detect acute cytauxzoonosis and can be utilized to develop a point-of-care test for clinical use.

Project description:BackgroundLeptospirosis is diagnosed on clinical grounds, and confirmed by microscopic agglutination test (MAT). IgM-ELISA (Serion-Virion) and immunochromatography test (Leptocheck-WB) are two immunodiagnostic assays for leptospirosis. Their sensitivity, specificity and applicability in Sri Lanka have not been systematically evaluated.MethodsClinically diagnosed leptospirosis patients (n = 919) were recruited from three hospitals in the Western Province of Sri Lanka, during June 2012 to December 2013. MAT, IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB were performed on all patient sera. MAT titer of ≥ 400 in single sample, four-fold rise or seroconversion ≥ 100 in paired samples were considered as positive for MAT. For diagnostic confirmation, MAT was performed during both acute and convalescent phases. Anti-leptospiral IgM ≥ 20 IU/ml and appearance of a band in the test window were considered as positive for IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB test respectively. Patients with an alternative diagnosis (n = 31) were excluded. Data analysis was performed using two methods, i) considering MAT as reference standard and ii) using Bayesian latent class model analysis (BLCM) which considers each test as imperfect.ResultsMAT, IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB positivity were 39.8%, 45.8% and 38.7% respectively during the acute phase. Acute-phase MAT had specificity and sensitivity of 95.7% and 55.3% respectively, when compared to overall MAT positivity. IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB had similar diagnostic sensitivity when compared with acute-phase MAT as the gold standard, although IgM-ELISA showed higher specificity (84.5%) than Leptocheck-WB (73.3%). BLCM analysis showed that IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB had similar sensitivities (86.0% and 87.4%), while acute-phase MAT had the lowest sensitivity (77.4%). However, acute-phase MAT had high specificity (97.6%), while IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB showed similar but lower specificity (84.5% and 82.9%).ConclusionsBoth IgM-ELISA and Leptocheck-WB shows similar sensitivities and specificities. IgM-ELISA may be superior to MAT during the acute phase and suitable for early diagnosis of leptospirosis. Leptocheck-WB is suitable as a rapid immunodiagnostic screening test for resource limited settings.

Dataset Information

Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA.

Publications

Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets