Confidence reports in decision-making with multiple alternatives violate the Bayesian confidence hypothesis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Decision confidence reflects our ability to evaluate the quality of decisions and guides subsequent behavior. Experiments on confidence reports have almost exclusively focused on two-alternative decision-making. In this realm, the leading theory is that confidence reflects the probability that a decision is correct (the posterior probability of the chosen option). There is, however, another possibility, namely that people are less confident if the best two options are closer to each other in posterior probability, regardless of how probable they are in absolute terms. This possibility has not previously been considered because in two-alternative decisions, it reduces to the leading theory. Here, we test this alternative theory in a three-alternative visual categorization task. We found tha
SUBMITTER: Li HH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7181620 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA