Dataset Information

Effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice (J-BEST): a prospective study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Benralizumab is a humanized, fucosylated, monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin 5 (IL-5) α receptor. Several phase III trials have shown that benralizumab can significantly reduce the incidence of acute exacerbations and improve lung function in patients with severe asthma. However, there is a paucity of data from clinical practice. In this prospective study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice.

Methods

This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-center study in patients with severe asthma in clinical practice (UMIN000031951). Haematological, clinical, functional, and pharmacotherapeutic parameters were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12 after initiation of benralizumab.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled between May 2018 and March 2019. Both asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) score and asthma control test (ACT) score showed significant improvement over the study period. Forced expiratory volume in 1.0 second (FEV1) showed a significant increase at week 12 (baseline: 1.57 L; week 12: 1.75 L). Blood eosinophil and basophil counts were significantly decreased at week 12 compared to baseline. At week 12, the dose of regular oral corticosteroids (OCS) was significantly decreased from baseline as was the number of patients on need-based OCS. Benralizumab had no significant effect on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and total immunoglobulin E levels. Only one patient experienced mild headache during benralizumab therapy.

Conclusions

In this study, benralizumab conferred clinically significant benefits in patients with severe asthma with no short-term severe adverse events.

SUBMITTER: Izumo T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7210162 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice (J-BEST): a prospective study.

Izumo Takehiro T Tone Mari M Kuse Naoyuki N Awano Nobuyasu N Tanaka Atsuko A Jo Tatsunori T Yoshimura Hanako H Minami Jonsu J Takada Kohei K Inomata Minoru M

Annals of translational medicine 20200401 7

<h4>Background</h4>Benralizumab is a humanized, fucosylated, monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin 5 (IL-5) α receptor. Several phase III trials have shown that benralizumab can significantly reduce the incidence of acute exacerbations and improve lung function in patients with severe asthma. However, there is a paucity of data from clinical practice. In this prospective study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice.<h4>Methods ...[more]

PMID: 32395482

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeIn the Phase III SIROCCO trial (NCT01928771), benralizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and improved lung function and symptoms for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this subgroup analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of benralizumab for Korean patients in SIROCCO.MethodsSIROCCO was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 1,204 patients aged 12-75 years with severe asthma uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β₂-agonists (ICS/LABA). Patients received benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W; first 3 doses Q4W) or placebo Q4W for 48 weeks. The primary analysis population comprised patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL. This subgroup analysis evaluated Korean patients from this group.ResultsOf 122 Korean patients randomized, 86 had blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL. Benralizumab reduced the annual asthma exacerbation rate by 70% (Q4W: rate estimate 0.79, rate ratio 0.30 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.13-0.65], nominal P = 0.003; n = 28) and 85% (Q8W: rate estimate 0.40, rate ratio 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06-0.36], nominal P < 0.001; n = 30) vs. placebo (rate estimate 2.67, n = 28). Prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second was increased with benralizumab treatment by 0.270 L (Q4W: 95% CI, 0.039-0.500, nominal P = 0.023; n = 28) and 0.362 L (Q8W: 95% CI, 0.143-0.582, nominal P = 0.002; n = 30) vs. placebo (n = 27). Total asthma symptom score was similar for patients receiving either benralizumab Q4W (-0.27 [95% CI, -0.83 to 0.30], nominal P = 0.356; n = 27) or benralizumab Q8W (0.10 [95% CI, -0.44 to 0.65], nominal P = 0.708; n = 30) vs. placebo (n = 28). Drug-related adverse events were experienced by 2%, 8%, and 5% of patients in the placebo, benralizumab Q4W, and benralizumab Q8W arms.ConclusionsBenralizumab reduced annual asthma exacerbation rates, increased lung function, and was well-tolerated by Korean patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

Project description:ObjectivesUse data from the UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) to assess the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in routine UK clinical practice and to identify characteristics of 'responders'.DesignProspective, longitudinal, cohort, multicentre registry study.SettingAll (11) UK centres performing BT.Participants and interventionPatients receiving BT in the UK between 01/06/2011 and 30/09/2016 who had consented to data entry into UKSAR (n=133). Efficacy data were available for 86 patients with a BT baseline and at least one follow-up record. Safety data were available for 131 patients with at least one BT procedure record.Primary and secondary outcome measuresEfficacy: AQLQ, ACQ, EuroQol, HADS anxiety and HADS depression scores, FEV1 (% predicted), rescue steroid courses, unscheduled healthcare visits (A&E/Asthma clinic/GP), hospital admissions and days lost from work/school.Safetyperi-procedural events, device problems and any other safety-related findings. Responder analysis: differences in baseline characteristics of 'responders' (≥0.5 increase in AQLQ at 12 months) and 'non-responders'.ResultsFollowing Bonferroni correction for paired comparisons, mean improvement in AQLQ at 12 months follow-up compared with BT baseline was statistically and clinically significant (0.75, n=28, p=0.0003). Median reduction in hospital admissions/year after 24 months follow-up was also significant (-1.0, n=26, p<0.0001). No deterioration in FEV1 was observed. From 28 patients with AQLQ data at BTBL and 12-month follow-up, there was some evidence that lower age may predict AQLQ improvement. 18.9% (70/370) of procedures and 44.5% (57/128) of patients were affected by an adverse event; only a minority were considered serious.ConclusionsImprovement in AQLQ is consistent with similar findings from clinical trials. Other efficacy outcomes demonstrated improving trends without reaching statistical significance. Missing follow-up data impacted this study but multiple imputation confirmed observed AQLQ improvement. The safety review suggested BT is being performed safely in the UK.

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of benralizumab has been broadly demonstrated in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), but only few real-life studies evaluated its long-term effects. Here we present novel data from the ANANKE study in which a large cohort of SEA patients was treated for up to 96 weeks.MethodsANANKE (NCT04272463) is an observational retrospective Italian study investigating the key characteristics of SEA patients (collected during the 12 months prior to benralizumab initiation) and the clinical outcomes during benralizumab treatment (annual exacerbation rate [AER], lung function, asthma control, OCS use, healthcare resource utilization). A post hoc analysis was also conducted in groups of patients based on history of previous biologic therapy (bio-experienced versus naïve patients). Analyses were descriptive only.ResultsBefore benralizumab initiation, evaluable SEA patients (N = 162, 61.1% females, mean age 56.0 ± 12.7) showed a median blood eosinophil count (BEC) of 600 cells/mm3 (IQR: 430-890). Patients experienced frequent exacerbations (annualized exacerbation rate [AER]: 4.10, severe AER: 0.98), with impaired lung function and poor asthma control (median ACT score: 14) despite 25.3% reported oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Nasal polyposis was present in 53.1% patients; 47.5% patients were atopic. After 96 weeks since the start of benralizumab, nearly 90% patients were still on treatment; benralizumab dramatically decreased exacerbations (AER: - 94.9%; severe AER: - 96.9%), improved respiratory parameters (median increase in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume [pre-BD FEV1]: + 400 mL) and asthma control (median ACT score: 23) while eliminating OCS in 60% patients. Importantly, benralizumab effects were either maintained or progressively improved over time, accompanied by a nearly complete depletion of BEC. Benralizumab reduced AER both in naïve (any AER: - 95.9%; severe AER: - 97.5%) and bio-experienced patients (any AER: - 92.4%; severe AER: - 94.0%).ConclusionsProfound and sustained improvements in all asthma outcomes were observed with benralizumab. The correct identification of patients' eosinophilic-driven asthma phenotype was essential to ensure the achievement of such remarkable results.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04272463.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice (J-BEST): a prospective study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice (J-BEST): a prospective study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets