Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime survival.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Authoritarian incumbents routinely use democratic emulation as a strategy to extend their tenure in power. Yet, there is also evidence that multiparty competition makes electoral authoritarianism more vulnerable to failure. Proceeding from the assumption that the outcomes of authoritarian electoral openings are inherently uncertain, it is argued in this article that the institutionalisation of elections determines whether electoral authoritarianism promotes stability or vulnerability. By 'institutionalisation', it is meant the ability of authoritarian regimes to reduce uncertainty over outcomes as they regularly hold multiparty elections. Using discrete-time event-history models for competing risks, the effects of sequences of multiparty elections on patterns of regime survival and failure
SUBMITTER: Bernhard M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7217209 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA