Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created an urgent and unprecedented need for rapid large-scale diagnostic testing to inform timely patient management. However, robust data are lacking on the relative performance of available rapid molecular tests across a full range of viral concentrations.Objective
This study aimed to compare two recently-authorized rapid tests, Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Abbott ID Now SARS-CoV-2, to the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay for samples with low, medium, and high viral concentrations.Study design
A total of 113 nasopharyngeal swabs from remnant patient samples were tested, including 88 positives spanning the full range of observed Ct values on the cobas assay.Results
Compared to cobas, the overall positive agreement
SUBMITTER: Smithgall MC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7217789 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature