Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The accuracy of the signs and tests that clinicians use to diagnose ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and initiate antibiotic treatment has not been well characterized. We sought to characterize and compare the accuracy of physical examination, chest radiography, endotracheal aspirate (ETA), bronchoscopic sampling cultures (protected specimen brush [PSB] and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]), and CPIS > 6 to diagnose VAP. We searched six databases from inception through September 2019 and selected English-language studies investigating accuracy of any of the above tests for VAP diagnosis. Reference standard was histopathological analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We included 25 studies (1639 patients). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of
SUBMITTER: Fernando SM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7223448 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA