Dataset Information

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Methods

Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 day 1-5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival.

Results

Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3-4 adverse events in 25-30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93).

Conclusion

This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406).

SUBMITTER: Van Den Bent M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7229258 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Van Den Bent Martin M Eoli Marica M Sepulveda Juan Manuel JM Smits Marion M Walenkamp Annemiek A Frenel Jean-Sebastian JS Franceschi Enrico E Clement Paul M PM Chinot Olivier O De Vos Filip F Whenham Nicolas N Sanghera Paul P Weller Michael M Dubbink H J HJ French Pim P Looman Jim J Dey Jyotirmoy J Krause Scott S Ansell Pete P Nuyens Sarah S Spruyt Maarten M Brilhante Joana J Coens Corneel C Gorlia Thierry T Golfinopoulos Vassilis V

Neuro-oncology 20200501 5

<h4>Background</h4>Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.<h4>Methods</h4>Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at fi ...[more]

PMID: 31747009

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND Depatux-M is an antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) specific to the activated conformation of EGFR bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. In the primary analysis on EORTC 1410 we reported a trend (p = 0.06) towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-amplified (amp) recurrent glioblastoma treated with Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide. METHODS Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFRamp glioblastoma at 1st recurrence after temozolomide chemo-irradiation. Patients were randomized to either a) Depatux-M 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either lomustine or temozolomide (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Pharmacokinetic sampling was part of the study design, all samples were used to calculate the Depatux-M average concentration during course 1 (CavgC1). The level of EGFRamp was re-analysed using next generation sequencing. RESULTS In February 2018, an updated OS comparison performed after 220 observed deaths of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM using log-rank test and cox models stratified by stratification factors at randomization showed a HR of 0.68 (95%CI [0.48, 0.95]; p = 0.024) and 1-year OS rates of 40% versus 28%. In multivariate analysis CavgC1 was a significant predictor for OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.98], p = 0.0013). In Depatux-M treated patients, EGFR status (high vs low level amplification) did not correlate with OS. At the meeting the follow-up from Aug 2018 will be presented, obtained more than 24 months after the end of accrual. CONCLUSION: This updated OS analysis of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide confirmed the OS improvement in EGFRamp recurrent glioblastoma. In Depatux-M treated patients, higher drug levels during course 1 were associated with improved OS, but high levels of EGFR amplification at first diagnosis were not.

Project description:Abstract Background Depatux-M is a n antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) specific to the activated conformation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. In the primary analysis on EORTC 1410 we reported a trend (p = 0.06) towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma treated with Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. We now present updated results. Material and Methods Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR-amplified glioblastoma at 1st recurrence after TMZ chemo-irradiation, occurring ≥3 months after radiotherapy. Patients were randomized to either a) Depatux-M 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with TMZ 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either LOM or TMZ (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on day (d) 1 before and after dosing, d 4–7, d 1 course 2 before and after dosing, d 5–7 course 2, d 1 course 3, and then every 2 cycles. All available PK samples were used to calculate the Depatux-M average concentration during course 1 (CavgC1). The level of EGFR amplification was determined using both qPCR, next generation sequencing and FISH. Results In February 2018, an updated OS comparison with longer follow-up (median: 21 mo) performed after 220 observed deaths of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM using log-rank test and cox models stratified by stratification factors at randomization showed a HR of 0.68 (95%CI [0.48, 0.95]; p = 0.024) and 1-year OS rates of 40% versus 28%. In multivariate analysis including performance status, MGMT, surgery for recurrence, time from last TMZ to relapse and lesion diameter, CavgC1 was a significant predictor for OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.98], p = 0.0013). In Depatux-M treated patients, EGFR status (high vs low level amplification) did not correlate with OS. At the meeting further follow-up data will be presented obtained at database cleaning done > 24 months after the end of accrual allowing definitive analysis. Conclusion This updated OS analysis confirmed the OS improvement in EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma after treatment with of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. In Depatux-M treated patients, higher drug levels during course 1 were associated with improved OS but high levels of EGFR amplification at first diagnosis were not.

Project description:BackgroundRecurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has dismal outcomes and limited treatment options. Mebendazole (MBZ) has activity in glioma both in-vivo and in-vitro, and is well tolerated in combination with lomustine (CCNU) and temozolomide (TMZ). In this study, we sought to determine whether the addition of MBZ to CCNU or TMZ would improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent GBM.MethodsIn this phase II randomized open-label trial, adult patients with ECOG PS 0-3, with recurrent GBM who were not eligible for re-radiation, were randomized 1:1 to the CCNU-MBZ and TMZ-MBZ arms. CCNU was administered at 110 mg/m2 every 6 weeks with MBZ 800 mg thrice daily and TMZ was administered at 200 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 of a 28 days cycle with MBZ 1600 mg thrice daily. The primary endpoint was OS at 9 months. A 9-month OS of 55% or more in any arm was hypothesized to warrant further evaluation and a value below 35% was too low to warrant further investigation. OS was analyzed using intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Per-protocol analysis was used for safety analysis. Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2018/01/011542.FindingsParticipants were recruited from 14th March 2019 to 18th June 2021, 44 patients were randomised on each arm. At 17.4 months, 68 events for OS analysis had occurred, 33 in the TMZ-MBZ and 35 in the CCNU-MBZ arm. The 9-month OS was 36.6% (95% CI 22.3-51.0) and 45% (95% CI 29.6-59.2) in the TMZ-MBZ and CCNU-MBZ arms respectively, in the ITT population. ECOG PS was the only independent prognostic factor impacting OS (HR-0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.85; P = 0.012). Grade 3-5 adverse events were seen in 8 (18.6%; n = 43) and 4 (9.5%; n = 42) patients in the TMZ-MBZ and CCNU-MBZ arms respectively. There were no treatment related deaths.InterpretationThe addition of MBZ to TMZ or CCNU failed to achieve the pre-set benchmark of 55% 9-month OS. This was probably due to 28.6% of patients having poor PS of 2-3.FundingBrain Tumor Foundation (BTF) of India, Indian Cooperative Oncology Network (ICON), and India Cancer Research Consortium (ICRC) under ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research).

Project description:ImportanceTumor-treating fields (TTFields) is an antimitotic treatment modality that interferes with glioblastoma cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields to the tumor.ObjectiveTo investigate whether TTFields improves progression-free and overall survival of patients with glioblastoma, a fatal disease that commonly recurs at the initial tumor site or in the central nervous system.Design, setting, and participantsIn this randomized, open-label trial, 695 patients with glioblastoma whose tumor was resected or biopsied and had completed concomitant radiochemotherapy (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months) were enrolled at 83 centers (July 2009-2014) and followed up through December 2016. A preliminary report from this trial was published in 2015; this report describes the final analysis.InterventionsPatients were randomized 2:1 to TTFields plus maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229). The TTFields, consisting of low-intensity, 200 kHz frequency, alternating electric fields, was delivered (≥ 18 hours/d) via 4 transducer arrays on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable device. Temozolomide was administered to both groups (150-200 mg/m2) for 5 days per 28-day cycle (6-12 cycles).Main outcomes and measuresProgression-free survival (tested at α = .046). The secondary end point was overall survival (tested hierarchically at α = .048). Analyses were performed for the intent-to-treat population. Adverse events were compared by group.ResultsOf the 695 randomized patients (median age, 56 years; IQR, 48-63; 473 men [68%]), 637 (92%) completed the trial. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 6.7 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 4.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < .001). Median overall survival was 20.9 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group vs 16.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76; P < .001). Systemic adverse event frequency was 48% in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 44% in the temozolomide-alone group. Mild to moderate skin toxicity underneath the transducer arrays occurred in 52% of patients who received TTFields-temozolomide vs no patients who received temozolomide alone.Conclusions and relevanceIn the final analysis of this randomized clinical trial of patients with glioblastoma who had received standard radiochemotherapy, the addition of TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy vs maintenance temozolomide alone, resulted in statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival. These results are consistent with the previous interim analysis.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.

Dataset Information

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets