The liaison between respiratory failure and high blood pressure: evidence from COVID-19 patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Vicenzi M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7241109 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The liaison between respiratory failure and high blood pressure: evidence from COVID-19 patients.
Vicenzi Marco M Di Cosola Roberta R Ruscica Massimiliano M Ratti Angelo A Rota Irene I Rota Federica F Bollati Valentina V Aliberti Stefano S Blasi Francesco F
The European respiratory journal 20200730 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:L’âge et les comorbidités cardiovasculaires sont des facteurs indépendants de mortalité et d’hospitalisation en unité de soins intensifs chez les patients atteints de coronavirus 19 (COVID-19), contrairement à l’hypertension artérielle (HTA). La forte prévalence de l’HTA chez les personnes âgées, coronariens ou insuffisants cardiaques, explique l’importante prévalence de l’HTA parmi les patients hospitalisés et présentant des formes sévères de COVID-19. L’HTA, en tant que premier facteur de risque de morbi-mortalité cardiovasculaire, constitue le lit des comorbidités cardiovasculaires qui favorisent les formes sévères de COVID-19. L’hypothèse d’une surexpression de l’enzyme de conversion de l’angiotensine de type 2 membranaire par les inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion et antagonistes des récepteurs de l’angiotensine 2, favorisant l’invasion cellulaire par le severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reste hypothétique, est insuffisante pour expliquer la pathogénie de ce virus, et ne doit pas amener à interrompre ces traitements. Les patients hypertendus et cardiovasculaires doivent faire l’objet d’une surveillance particulière en raison de leur susceptibilité aux formes graves de COVID-19, de leur risque accru de complications cardiovasculaires aiguës ou de décompensation de maladies cardiovasculaires chroniques. Le risque d’infection par le SARS-CoV-2 ne doit pas détourner les soignants et les patients de la prise en charge des urgences cardiovasculaires, même en temps d’épidémie.
| S-EPMC7419269 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), exhibit a wide spectrum of disease behavior. Since DNA methylation has been implicated in the regulation of viral infections and the immune system, we performed an epigenome- wide association study (EWAS) to identify candidate loci regulated by this epigenetic mark that could be involved in the onset of COVID-19 in patients without comorbidities.
2021-04-15 | GSE168739 | GEO
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7668008 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDuring COVID-19 pandemic, people who developed pneumonia and needed supplemental oxygen, where treated with low-flow oxygen therapy systems and non-invasive methods, including oxygen therapy using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and the application of bi-level or continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP or CPAP). We aimed to investigate the outcomes of critical COVID-19 patients treated with HFNC and unveil predictors of HFNC failure.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients admitted to COVID-19 wards and treated with HFNC for COVID-19-related severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The primary outcome of this study was treatment failure, such as the composite of intubation or death during hospital stay. The association between treatment failure and clinical features was evaluated using logistic regression models.ResultsOne hundred thirty-two patients with a median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio 96 (63-173) mmHg at HFNC initiation were studied. Overall, 45.4% of the patients were intubated. Hospital mortality was 31.8%. Treatment failure (intubation or death) occurred in 50.75% and after adjustment for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) score and National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) score on admission and PaO2/FiO2 ratio and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity at the time of HFNO initiation, it was significantly associated with the presence of dyspnea [adjusted OR 2.48 (95% CI: 1.01-6.12)], and higher Urea serum levels [adjusted OR 1.25 (95% CI: 1.03-1.51) mg/dL].ConclusionsHFNC treatment was successful in almost half of the patients with severe COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). The presence of dyspnea and high serum Urea levels on admission are closely related to HFNC failure.
| S-EPMC9096326 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWhether the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in adult patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure improves clinically relevant outcomes remains unclear. We thus sought to assess the effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on ventilator-free days, compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, on adult patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre cohort study using a prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure admitted to 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs). Main exposure was the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (conservative group), while early invasive mechanical ventilation (within the first day of ICU admission; early intubation group) served as the comparator. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days at 28 days. ICU length of stay and all-cause in-hospital mortality served as secondary outcomes. We used propensity score matching to adjust for measured confounding.ResultsOut of 468 eligible patients, a total of 122 matched patients were included in the present analysis (61 for each group). When compared to early intubation, the use of high-flow nasal oxygen was associated with an increase in ventilator-free days (mean difference: 8.0 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4 to 11.7 days) and a reduction in ICU length of stay (mean difference: - 8.2 days; 95% CI - 12.7 to - 3.6 days). No difference was observed in all-cause in-hospital mortality between groups (odds ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.64).ConclusionsThe use of high-flow nasal oxygen upon ICU admission in adult patients with COVID-19 related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may lead to an increase in ventilator-free days and a reduction in ICU length of stay, when compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Future studies should confirm our findings.
| S-EPMC7876530 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-BSST416 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7560807 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo describe the rate of failure of the first transition to pressure support ventilation (PSV) after systematic spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and to assess whether the failure is higher in COVID-19 compared with AHRF of other etiologies. To determine predictors and potential association of failure with outcomes.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTwenty-eight-bedded medical-surgical ICU in a private hospital (Argentina).PatientsSubjects with arterial pressure of oxygen (AHRF to Fio2 [Pao2/Fio2] < 300 mm Hg) of different etiologies under controlled mechanical ventilation (MV).InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsWe collected data during controlled ventilation within 24 hours before SAT followed by the first PSV transition. Failure was defined as the need to return to fully controlled MV within 3 calendar days of PSV start. A total of 274 patients with AHRF (189 COVID-19 and 85 non-COVID-19) were included. The failure occurred in 120 of 274 subjects (43.7%) and was higher in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 (49.7% and 30.5%; p = 0.003). COVID-19 diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22; 95% CI [1.15-4.43]; p = 0.020), previous neuromuscular blockers (OR: 2.16; 95% CI [1.15-4.11]; p = 0.017) and higher fentanyl dose (OR: 1.29; 95% CI [1.05-1.60]; p = 0.018) increased the failure chances. Higher BMI (OR: 0.95; 95% CI [0.91-0.99]; p = 0.029), Pao2/Fio2 (OR: 0.87; 95% CI [0.78-0.97]; p = 0.017), and pH (OR: 0.61; 95% CI [0.38-0.96]; p = 0.035) were protective. Failure groups had higher 60-day ventilator dependence (p < 0.001), MV duration (p < 0.0001), and ICU stay (p = 0.001). Patients who failed had higher mortality in COVID-19 group (p < 0.001) but not in the non-COVID-19 (p = 0.083).ConclusionsIn patients with AHRF of different etiologies, the failure of the first PSV attempt was 43.7%, and at a higher rate in COVID-19. Independent risk factors included COVID-19 diagnosis, fentanyl dose, previous neuromuscular blockers, acidosis and hypoxemia preceding SAT, whereas higher BMI was protective. Failure was associated with worse outcomes.
| S-EPMC10461949 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTocilizumab has been shown to decrease mortality when used concomitantly with steroids in COVID-19 with 8 mg/kg (max 800 mg) being the standard dose. Our study sought to assess whether a low dose (400 mg) shows similar benefit compared to a high dose for COVID patients concurrently on the same median dose of steroids.Materials/methodsA retrospective, multihospital observational study of COVID-19 patients who received tocilizumab in conjunction with steroids between March 2020 and August 2021 was conducted.ResultsA total of 407 patients were analyzed with low dose group being significantly more ill at baseline as a higher percentage of patients received vasopressors, were admitted to the ICU and on mechanical ventilation. In the propensity-matched analysis, both groups receiving a median dexamethasone equivalent dose of 10 mg showed no difference in 28-day mortality (p = 0.613). The high dose group had a higher rate of fungal and viral infections.ConclusionCompared to low dose tocilizumab, the high dose did not provide additional efficacy and mortality benefit but resulted in higher fungal and viral infections. This study illustrates that low dose tocilizumab can be an alternative to high dose during a drug shortage of tocilizumab without compensating for efficacy and safety, conserving resources for more patients.
| S-EPMC10084735 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 is poorly understood and remains controversial.MethodsWe evaluated a large cohort of patients with COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure at the temporary COVID-19 hospital in Mexico City. The primary outcome was the success rate of HFNC to prevent the progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We also evaluated the risk factors associated with HFNC success or failure.ResultsHFNC use effectively prevented IMV in 71.4% of patients [270 of 378 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 66.6-75.8%]. Factors that were significantly different at admission included age, the presence of hypertension, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Predictors of therapy failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% CI) included the comorbidity-age-lymphocyte count-lactate dehydrogenase (CALL) score at admission (1.27, 1.09-1.47; p < 0.01), Rox index at 1 hour (0.82, 0.7-0.96; p = 0.02), and no prior steroid treatment (0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62; p < 0.0001). Patients with HFNC success rarely required admission to the intensive care unit and had shorter lengths of hospital stay [19/270 (7.0%) and 15.0 (interquartile range, 11-20) days, respectively] than those who required IMV [104/108 (96.3%) and 26.5 (20-36) days, respectively].ConclusionTreating patients with HFNC at admission led to improvement in respiratory parameters in many patients with COVID-19.
| S-EPMC8419547 | biostudies-literature