Considerations for Pediatric Craniofacial Surgeons During the COVID-19 Outbreak.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Schoenbrunner A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7282403 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Considerations for Pediatric Craniofacial Surgeons During the COVID-19 Outbreak.
Schoenbrunner Anna A Sarac Benjamin B Gosman Amanda A Janis Jeffrey E JE
The Journal of craniofacial surgery 20200901 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:Surgeons who operate around nasal or oral airways are at particularly high risk for transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This multipart study explores the changes in craniofacial surgeon preferences and practices for personal protective equipment (PPE) over the course of a worldwide pandemic.MethodsTwo identical electronic survey studies, one in 2020 and one in 2022, were conducted on the use of PPE before, during, and after the pandemic among active craniomaxillofacial surgeons. Statistical changes in behaviors and preferences and differences across time points and demographic groups were evaluated.ResultsThe initial study included responses from 48 surgeons, and the follow-up study consisted of 36 responses. Although only 4.3% of surgeons wore N95 masks or powered air purifying respirator for craniomaxillofacial operations before the pandemic, 91.5% wore these measures during the early pandemic (P < 0.001). However, this fell to 74.3% 2 years later. Similarly, more than 95% of surgeons wore a mask in clinic during the pandemic at both time points compared to only 40.3% before the pandemic (P < 0.001). In 2020, 31.9% of surgeons planned to continue using N95 masks or powered air purifying respirator for craniofacial cases after the pandemic was over, but that fell to 11.4% in the follow-up study.ConclusionsCraniofacial surgeon practices have shifted significantly toward more protective PPE over the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, this effect was dampened over the course of a protracted pandemic. Despite this, our studies indicate a long-term shift in surgeon preference that is likely to persist after the pandemic is over.
| S-EPMC9838609 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Telehealth can improve access to evidence-based care at a lower cost for patients, especially those living in underserved and remote areas. The barriers to the widespread adoption of telehealth have been well documented in the literature. However, the barriers may not be the same for pediatric patients, who must rely on their parents or guardians to make healthcare decisions. This paper presents some of the leading barriers parents or guardians of pediatric patients report in using telehealth to meet their children’s healthcare needs. Methods This cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric Emergency Department (ED) at a children’s hospital in Alabama between September 2020 to December 2020. The parents or guardians of pediatric patients were asked about their reasons for not using telehealth despite having healthcare needs for their children, whether they canceled or rescheduled healthcare provider visits and facility visits, and whether the child’s health conditions changed over the past three months. Descriptive analyses were conducted that explored the distribution of telehealth use across the variables listed above. Results Five hundred ninety-seven parents or guardians of pediatric patients participated in the survey, and 578 answered the question of whether they used telehealth or not over the past three months. Of them, 33.1% used telehealth, 54.3% did not, and 12.6% did not have healthcare needs for their child. The leading reason for not using telehealth was that the doctor or health provider did not give them a telehealth option, the second main reason was that they did not know what telehealth is, and the third leading reason was that the parents did not think telehealth would help meet healthcare needs for their child. Conclusions This study highlights the telehealth utilization barriers among underserved pediatric populations, including the need for physicians to proactively offer telehealth options to parents or guardians of pediatric patients. Improving health literacy is of paramount importance, given that a substantial proportion of parents were not familiar with telehealth. Policymakers and healthcare organizations should raise awareness about the benefits of telehealth which can improve healthcare access for underserved pediatric patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09732-w.
| S-EPMC10294506 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not only caused global social disruptions but has also put tremendous strain on healthcare systems worldwide. With all attention and significant effort diverted to containing and managing the COVID-19 outbreak (and understandably so), essential medical services such as transplant services are likely to be affected. Closure of transplant programs in an outbreak caused by a highly transmissible novel pathogen may be inevitable owing to patient safety. Yet program closure is not without harm; patients on the transplant waitlist may die before the program reopens. By adopting a tiered approach based on outbreak disease alert levels, and having hospital guidelines based on the best available evidence, life-saving transplants can still be safely performed. We performed a lung transplant and a liver transplant successfully during the COVID-19 era. We present our guidelines and experience on managing the transplant service as well as the selection and management of donors and recipients. We also discuss clinical dilemmas in the management COVID-19 in the posttransplant recipient.
| S-EPMC7266363 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrior to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-clinic visits were the standard of care for pediatric physicians and surgeons at our center. At the pandemic onset, web-based care was adopted at an unprecedented scale and pace.ObjectiveThis descriptive study explores the web-based care experience of pediatric physicians and surgeons during the pandemic by determining factors that supported and challenged web-based care adoption.MethodsThis study took place at the Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, a children's hospital in London, Ontario, Canada, which provides pediatric care for patients from the London metropolitan area and the rest of Southwestern Ontario. The Donabedian model was used to structure a web-based survey evaluating web-based care experience, which was distributed to 121 department-affiliated pediatric physicians (including generalists and subspecialists in surgery and medicine). Recruitment occurred via department listserv email. Qualitative data were collected through discrete and free-text survey responses.ResultsSurvey response rate was 52.1% (63/121). Before the pandemic, few physicians within the Department of Paediatrics used web-based care, and physicians saw <10% of patients digitally. During March-May 2020, the majority transitioned to web-based care, seeing >50% of patients digitally. Web-based care use in our sample fell from June to September 2020, with the majority seeing <50% of patients digitally. Telephone and Ontario Telemedicine Network were the platforms most used from March to September 2020. Web-based care was rated to be convenient for most providers and their patients, despite the presence of technical difficulties. Challenges included lack of physical exam, lower patient volumes, and poor patient digital care etiquette. Regardless of demographics, 96.4% (116/121) would continue web-based care, ideally for patients who live far away and for follow-ups or established diagnoses.ConclusionsTransition to web-based care during COVID-19 was associated with challenges but also positive experiences. Willingness among pediatricians and pediatric surgeons to continue web-based care was high. Web-based care experiences at our center could be improved with patient education and targeting select populations. Future research is needed to improve practice efficiency and to inform regulatory guidelines for web-based care.
| S-EPMC9202653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The provision of safe obstetric anaesthesia services is essential during the COVID-19 global outbreak. The identification of the 'high-infection risk' parturient can be challenging especially with the rapidly changing risk criteria for COVID-19 'cases'. A multidisciplinary taskforce is required to review the infection control protocols and workflows for managing the parturient for labour analgesia and for Caesarean section in order to minimize infection risk to healthcare staff and other parturients. A constant review of such processes is needed to enhance efficiency and to optimise use of finite resources. Good communication between health officials, institutional leadership and ground staff is essential for the dissemination of information.
| S-EPMC7194906 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required rapid, global health care shifts to prioritize urgent or pandemic-related care and minimize transmission. Little is known about impacts on pediatric orthopaedic surgeons during this time. We aimed to investigate COVID-19-related changes in practice, training, and research among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons globally.MethodsAn online survey was administered to orthopaedic surgeons with interest in pediatrics in April 2020 and a follow-up was administered in February 2021. The surveys captured demographics and surgeons' self-reported experiences during the pandemic. Participants were recruited from web media and available email lists of orthopaedic societies over a 2-month period. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results, stratified by the severity of local COVID-19-related measures.ResultsA total of 460 responses from 45 countries were collected for initial survey. Of these, 358 (78.5%) respondents reported lockdown measures in their region at time of survey. Most (n=337, 94.4%) reported pausing all elective procedures. Surgeons reported a reduction in the average number of surgeries per week, from 6.89 (SD=4.61) prepandemic to 1.25 (SD=2.26) at time of survey (mean difference=5.64; 95% confidence interval=5.19, 6.10). Average number of elective outpatient appointments per week decreased from 67.89 (SD=45.78) prepandemic to 11.79 (SD=15.83) at time of survey (mean difference=56.10, 95% confidence interval=5.61, 60.58). In total, 177 (39.4%) surgeons reported using virtual modes of outpatient appointments for the first time. Of 290 surgeons with trainees, 223 (84.5%) reported implementation of systems to continue training such as webinars or virtual rounds. Of 192 respondents with research, 149 (82.8%) reported continuing research activities during the pandemic with most reporting either cessation (n=75, 64.15%), or reduction (n=25, 29.9%) in participant recruitment. A total of 111 responses from 28 countries were collected during follow-up. Surgeons described policy and circumstantial changes that facilitated resumption of clinical work.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic and its related counter measures have had significant impacts on pediatric orthopaedic practice and increased uptake of technology to provide care continuity. Rigorous epidemiological studies are needed to assess impacts of delayed and virtual care on patient outcomes.
| S-EPMC8357035 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The US Food and Drug Administration is committed to the development of effective antiviral regimens for pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including infants and neonates. On April 25, 2022, the approved indication of remdesivir (RDV) was expanded to include pediatric patients 28 days and older and weighing at least 3 kg with positive results of direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral testing, who are: Hospitalized, or Not hospitalized and have mild to moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death. Given the similar course of COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients, the approval of RDV for use in pediatric patients is supported by the safety and efficacy data from adequate and well-controlled phase 3 trials in adults and adolescents; and by the safety and pharmacokinetic data from a single-arm, open-label, phase 2/3 pediatric clinical trial of 53 pediatric patients at least 28 days of age and weighing at least 3 kg with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19. At the time of the April 25, 2022, approval action, the US Food and Drug Administration also revoked the emergency use authorization for RDV that previously covered this pediatric population. This article summarizes key issues and regulatory considerations involved in the RDV COVID-19 pediatric development program, including the evolution of the emergency use authorization issued for RDV as results from registrational studies became available, and discusses lessons learned.
| S-EPMC9538509 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNonoperative treatment (NOT) of pediatric appendicitis as opposed to surgery elicits great debate and is potentially influenced by physician preferences. Owing to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care, the practice of NOT has generally increased by necessity and may, in a post-COVID-19 world, change surgeons' perceptions of NOT.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether the use of NOT has increased in South Asia and whether these levels of practice would be sustained after the pandemic subsides.MethodsA survey was conducted among pediatric surgeons regarding their position, institute, and country; the number of appendicitis cases they managed; and their mode of treatment between identical time periods in 2019 and 2020 (April 1 to August 31). The survey also directly posed the question as to whether they would continue with the COVID-19-imposed level of NOT after the effect of the pandemic diminishes.ResultsA total of 134 responses were collected out of 200 (67.0%). A significant increase in the practice of NOT was observed for the entire cohort, although no effect was observed when grouped by country or institute. When grouped by position, senior physicians increased the practice of NOT the most, while junior physicians reported the least change. The data suggest that only professors would be inclined to maintain the COVID-19-level of NOT practice after the pandemic.ConclusionsIncreased practice of NOT during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed in South Asia, particularly by senior surgeons. Only professors appeared inclined to consider maintaining this increased level of practice in the post-COVID-19 world.
| S-EPMC8691415 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:COVID-19 appeared in late 2019, causing a pandemic spread. This led to a reorganisation of oncology care in order to reduce the risk of spreading infection between patients and healthcare staff. Here we analysed measures taken in major oncological units in Europe and the USA. METHODS:A 46-item survey was sent by email to representatives of 30 oncological centres in 12 of the most affected countries. The survey inquired about preventive measures established to reduce virus spread, patient education and processes employed for risk reduction in each oncological unit. RESULTS:Investigators from 21 centres in 10 countries answered the survey between 10 April and 6 May 2020. A triage for patients with cancer before hospital or clinic visits was conducted by 90.5% of centres before consultations, 95.2% before day care admissions and in 100% of the cases before overnight hospitalisation by means of phone calls, interactive online platforms, swab test and/or chest CT scan. Permission for caregivers to attend clinic visits was limited in many centres, with some exceptions (ie, for non-autonomous patients, in the case of a new diagnosis, when bad news was expected and for terminally ill patients). With a variable delay period, the use of personal protective equipment was unanimously mandatory, and in many centres, only targeted clinical and instrumental examinations were performed. Telemedicine was implemented in 76.2% of the centres. Separated pathways for COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients were organised, with separate inpatient units and day care areas. Self-isolation was required for COVID-19-positive or symptomatic staff, while return to work policies required a negative swab test in 76.2% of the centres. CONCLUSION:Many pragmatic measures have been quickly implemented to deal with the health emergency linked to COVID-19, although the relative efficacy of each intervention should be further analysed in large observational studies.
| S-EPMC7451457 | biostudies-literature