Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aims
The objective of this article is to compare the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the gallbladder (GB) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods
The data retrieved from the published randomized, controlled trials (RCT) comparing the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the GB following LC was analysed using the principles of meta-analysis. The summated outcome of continuous variables was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and dichotomous data was presented in odds ratio (OR).Results
Eight RCTs on 2676 patients comparing the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the GB following LC were analysed. In the random effects model analysis using the
SUBMITTER: Sood S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7283097 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature