Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To explore how best to deimplement nonrecommended medical services, which can result in excess costs and patient harm.Methods
We conducted telephone interviews with 15 providers at 3 health systems from June 19 to November 21, 2017. Using the case of nonrecommended imaging in patients with cancer, participants assessed the potential for 7 rationales or "arguments," each characterizing overuse in terms of a single problem type (cost or quality) and affected stakeholder group (clinicians, institutions, society, or patients), to convince colleagues to change their practices. We tested rationales for all problem-stakeholder combinations appearing in prior deimplementation studies.Results
Participants' views varied widely. Relatively few found cost arguments po
SUBMITTER: Chimonas SC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7283946 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature