Association Between Penicillin Allergy Documentation and Antibiotic Use.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Blumenthal KG
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7325068 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Association Between Penicillin Allergy Documentation and Antibiotic Use.
Blumenthal Kimberly G KG Kuper Kristi K Schulz Lucas T LT Bhowmick Tanaya T Postelnick Michael M Lee Francesca F Walensky Rochelle P RP
JAMA internal medicine 20200801 8
Similar Datasets
Project description:ImportanceElectronic health records (EHRs) often include default alerts that can influence physician selection of antibiotics, which in turn may be associated with a suboptimal choice of agents and increased antibiotic resistance.ObjectiveTo examine whether removal of a default alert in the EHR to avoid cephalosporin use in patients with penicillin allergies is associated with changes in cephalosporin dispensing or administration in these patients.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study of a natural experiment included data on patients who had received antibiotic treatment in the hospital or outpatient setting in 2 regions of a large, integrated health system in California from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Of 4 398 792 patients, 4 206 480 met the eligibility criteria: enrollment in the health system during antibiotic use, availability of complete demographic data, and use of antibiotics outside of the washout period.Interventions or exposuresOral or parenteral antibiotics dispensed or administered after removal of an EHR alert to avoid cephalosporin use in patients with a recorded penicillin allergy.Main outcomes and measuresProbability that an antibiotic course was a cephalosporin. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine the change in rates of cephalosporin use before and after an EHR penicillin allergy alert was removed in 1 of the study regions. Temporal changes in use rates were controlled for by comparing changes in cephalosporin use among patients with or without a penicillin allergy at the site that removed the warning and among patients at a comparison site that retained the warning. Regression models were used to examine adverse events.ResultsOf the 4 206 480 patients who met all inclusion criteria, 2 465 849 (58.6%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 40.5 (23.2) years. A total of 10 652 014 antibiotic courses were administered or dispensed, divided approximately evenly between the period before and after removal of the warning. Before removal of an alert in the electronic health record system to avoid prescribing of cephalosporins to patients with a penicillin allergy at 1 of the 2 sites, 58 228 courses of cephalosporins (accounting for 17.9% of all antibiotic use at the site) were used among patients with a penicillin allergy; after removal of the alert, administration or dispensing of cephalosporins increased by 47% compared with cephalosporin administration or dispensing among patients without a penicillin allergy at the same site and patients at the comparison site that retained the warning (ratio of ratios of odds ratios [RROR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.38-1.56) . No significant differences in anaphylaxis (9 total cases), new allergies (RROR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.12), or treatment failures (RROR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05) were found at the course level. No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (ratio of ratios of rate ratios [RRRR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13), hospital days (RRRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.10), and new infections (Clostridioides difficile: RRRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.22; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: RRRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00; and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: RRRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.22) at the patient level.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, removal of a warning in the electronic health record to avoid cephalosporin use in patients with penicillin allergies was associated with increased administration and dispensing of cephalosporin. This simple and rapidly implementable system-level intervention may be useful for improvement in antibiotic stewardship.
| S-EPMC8085727 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In a cross-sectional study of 20 Massachusetts long-term care (LTC) facilities, 19% (n = 449) of residents received antibiotics, with approximately one-third having a documented penicillin allergy. This documented allergy decreased the likelihood of prescribing beta-lactam antibiotics for infections. Improved penicillin allergy assessments and delabeling could optimize antibiotic prescribing in LTC settings.
| S-EPMC11488468 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To investigate documentation of antimicrobial allergy and to determine prescribing adherence to local antibiotic guidelines for inpatients with and without reported penicillin allergy treated for infection in a National Health Service (NHS) context. SETTING:Data were collected at two English hospital NHS trusts over two time-periods: June 2016 and February 2017. DESIGN:Cohort study. Trust 1 data were sourced from prospective point prevalence surveys. Trust 2 data were extracted retrospectively from an electronic report. PARTICIPANTS:Inpatients treated for urinary tract infection (UTI), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). Data on allergy were collected, and antibiotic selection assessed for adherence to trust guidelines with differences between groups presented as adjusted ORs. RESULTS:A total of 1497 patients were included, with 2645 antibiotics orders. Patients were treated for CAP (n=495; 33.1%), UTI (407; 27.2%), HAP (330; 22%) and SSTI (265; 17.7%). There were 240 (16%) patients with penicillin allergy. Penicillin allergy was recorded as allergy (n=52; 21.7%), side effect (27; 11.3%) and no documentation (161; 67.1%). Overall, 2184 (82.6%) antibiotic orders were guideline-adherent. Adherence was greatest for those labelled penicillin allergy (453 of 517; 87.6%) versus no allergy (1731 of 2128; 81.3%) (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.73) p<0.001). Guideline-adherence for CAP was higher if penicillin allergy (151 of 163; 92.6%) versus no allergy (582 of 810; 71.9%) (OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.37) p<0.001). There was no difference in adherence between those with and without penicillin allergy for UTI, HAP or SSTI treatment. CONCLUSIONS:A relatively high proportion of patients had a penicillin allergy and two thirds of these had no description of their allergy, which has important implications for patient safety. Patients with penicillin allergy treated for CAP, received more guideline adherent antibiotics than those without allergy. Future studies investigating the clinical impact of penicillin allergy should include data on adherence to antibiotic guidelines.
| S-EPMC6398633 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Efforts to delabel penicillin allergic patients are important as the majority of suspected penicillin allergy can be ruled out by relevant allergy testing. The aim is to change the antibiotic pattern in delabeled patients to minimize use of unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics, reducing the risk of antimicrobial resistance and making treatment more cost effective. However, published information on subsequent antibiotic use is scarce. To evaluate the effect of delabeling on subsequent antibiotic use in primary care, a cohort of 2911 patients tested for penicillin allergy was compared to a matched control group of 14,522 individuals from the background population. In total 86.4% of the tested patients were delabeled. For delabeled patients, penicillin use increased from 0.07 prescriptions per patient year before allergy investigation, to 0.53 prescriptions per patient year post investigation (p < 0.001). The use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides was reduced and reached a level comparable to the background population. This study shows that penicillin allergy delabeling has significant positive impact on subsequent antibiotic use in primary care, and that penicillin use increases to levels similar to the background population. Penicillin allergy delabeling should be prioritized as an important and efficient element in antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.
| S-EPMC11388693 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPenicillin allergy labels have gained increasing global attention. However, to date, there are no data on the influence of penicillin allergy labels on patients in Chinese mainland.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of hospitalized patients between June 1, 2018 and May 31, 2019. Patients with a penicillin allergy record were included in the allergy group. Every allergy patient was matched with 4 control patients by using propensity score-based matching to make sure the following were balanced: age, sex, date of admission, and the main diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of penicillin allergy labels and compared the antibiotic prescription patterns and other clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.ResultsA total of 5691 patients and 22 585 patients were included in the allergy group and control group, respectively. The prevalence of penicillin allergy labels among the hospitalized patients in this study was 4.00%. Compared to the control group, significantly fewer patients in the allergy group were prescribed penicillins and most cephalosporins, while a larger proportion of allergy patients received clindamycin (10.02% vs 5.41%, p < 0.001) and some higher-class antibiotics, such as monobactams (1.81% vs 0.54%, p < 0.001), carbapenems (5.80% vs 4.98%, p = 0.014), macrolides (0.60% vs 0.25%, p < 0.001), and quinolones (17.62% vs 12.40%, p < 0.001). Allergy patients also had longer hospital stays and a greater need to consult infection specialists.ConclusionThe prevalence of penicillin allergy labels was 4.00% in Chinese hospitalized patients. Penicillin allergy labels could cause irrational antibiotic prescribing, prolonged hospital stays, and greater consultation needs.
| S-EPMC9428801 | biostudies-literature
Project description:About 10% of U.K. patients believe that they are allergic to penicillin and have a "penicillin allergy label" in their primary care health record. However, around 90% of these patients may be mislabelled. Removing incorrect penicillin allergy labels can help to reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use. A rapid review was undertaken of papers exploring patient and/or clinician views and experiences of penicillin allergy testing (PAT) services and the influences on antibiotic prescribing behaviour in the context of penicillin allergy. We reviewed English-language publications published up to November 2017. Limited evidence on patients' experiences of PAT highlighted advantages to testing as well as a number of concerns. Clinicians reported uncertainty about referral criteria for PAT. Following PAT and a negative result, a number of clinicians and patients remained reluctant to prescribe and consume penicillins. This appeared to reflect a lack of confidence in the test result and fear of subsequent reactions to penicillins. The findings suggest lack of awareness and knowledge of PAT services by both clinicians and patients. In order to ensure correct penicillin allergy diagnosis, clinicians and patients need to be supported to use PAT services and equipped with the skills to use penicillins appropriately following a negative allergy test result.
| S-EPMC6164736 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7655694 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antibiotic resistance is influenced by prior antibiotic use, but precise causal estimates are limited. This study uses penicillin allergy as an instrumental variable (IV) to estimate the causal effect of antibiotics on resistance. A retrospective cohort of 36,351 individuals with E. coli positive urine cultures and prior outpatient antibiotic use, with outcomes assessed up to one year post-exposure, was analyzed using data from Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), the second-largest non-profit health fund in Israel. IV methods estimated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to harm (NNH) for penicillin versus other antibiotics. The RD for resistance was 11.4% (95% CI: 7.6%, 15.4%) for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 14.1% (95% CI: 9.0%, 19.4%) for ampicillin, and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.2%, 1.4%) for piperacillin/tazobactam, with NNHs of 8.8, 7.1, and 122.0, respectively. Risks declined over time since exposure. Gentamicin, used as a negative control, showed no effect (95% CI: -2.4%, 1.8%). When directly comparing penicillin and quinolone effects on their respective AMR, penicillin use within 180 days increased resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid by an RD of 17.8% (95% CI: 2.1%, 35.2%; NNH: 5.6), while quinolones raised ciprofloxacin resistance by 43.9% (95% CI: 29.9%, 59.4%; NNH: 2.3). These findings provide quantitative evidence of the impact of prior penicillin use on resistance, with implications for clinical practice and prescription policies.
| S-EPMC11772653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSuspected penicillin allergy (Pen-A) is often not verified by diagnostic testing. In third line penicillin allergy labels were associated with prescription of broad spectrum antibiotics, hospital stay duration and readmission.ObjectiveAssess the impact of Pen-A labels on antibiotic and health care use in primary care.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in primary care in the Utrecht area, the Netherlands. All patients registered with a penicillin allergy on 31 December 2013 were selected from the General Practitioner Network database. Each patient with a Pen-A label was matched for age, gender, follow-up period with three patients without Pen-A label. Risk (OR) of receiving a reserve and second choice antibiotic, number and type of antibiotics prescribed during follow-up and number of GP contacts were compared between the two cohorts.ResultsOf 196,440 patients, 1254 patients (0.6%) with a Pen-A label were identified and matched with 3756 patients without Pen-A label. Pen-A labels resulted in higher risk of receiving ≥1 antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.56, 95% CI 2.05-3.20), ≥1 s choice antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.21 95% CI 1.11-4.40), and ≥4 GP contacts per year (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.46-2.00). The chance of receiving tetracyclins (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.29-3.89), macrolides/lincosamides/streptogamins (OR 8.69, 95% CI 4.26-17.73) and quinolones (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.22-5.48) was higher in Pen-A patients.ConclusionsIn primary health care Pen-A labels are associated with increased antibiotic use, including second choice antibiotics, and more health care use.
| S-EPMC5461748 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is caused by the use and misuse of antibiotics. AMR is a global health concern, to which penicillin allergy (penA) labels appear to contribute. Patients who have penA labels are treated with non-penicillin antibiotics and receive more antibiotics when compared with patients without penA. Although penA is common, after formal allergy assessments, >90% of people with a penA label are found not to be allergic; therefore, broad-spectrum antibiotics are being misused and overused unnecessarily in these patients. Antimicrobial stewardship policies now advocate assessment to identify and remove incorrect penA labels; however, there is limited evidence on whether rectifying incorrect penA labels results in less AMR. This review aimed to assess the association between AMR and antibiotic allergy labels.MethodsA comprehensive literature search using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was conducted. Studies were included if they compared the presence of infection or colonization with an antimicrobial-resistant organism in participants with and without antibiotic allergy.ResultsThirty-three studies were included, and all the studies were observational in design and included a variety of patient groups. Eighteen studies compared AMR outcomes in participants with and without penA, and the rest investigated the impact of beta-lactam allergy or any antibiotic allergy on AMR outcomes. MRSA was the most investigated pathogen, and 11 of 13 studies showed that penA was associated with MRSA. PenA labels were also associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (three of five studies). There was limited evidence on the impact of penA on extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.ConclusionThe presence of penA labels is associated with antibiotic resistance in key pathogens in a wide variety of patient groups.
| S-EPMC11747217 | biostudies-literature