Using the COVID-19 economic crisis to frame climate change as a secondary issue reduces mitigation support.

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has understandably dominated public discourse, crowding out other important issues such as climate change. Currently, if climate change enters the arena of public debate, it primarily does so in direct relation to the pandemic. In two experiments, we investigated (1) whether portraying the response to the COVID-19 threat as a "trial run" for future climate action would increase climate-change concern and mitigation support, and (2) whether portraying climate change as a concern that needs to take a "back seat" while focus lies on economic recovery would decrease climate-change concern and mitigation support. We found no support for the effectiveness of a trial-run frame in either experiment. In Experiment 1, we found that a back-seat frame reduced participants' suppor

SUBMITTER: Ecker UKH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7330580 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature