Dataset Information

Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on swallowing disorders.

Design

MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of science, and PEDro were searched from their earliest record to August 1, 2019. All randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trial were identified, which compared the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation plus traditional therapy with traditional therapy in swallowing function. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to evaluate the quality of evidence.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials and three quasi-randomized controlled trials were included. These studies demonstrated a significant, moderate pooled effect size (standard mean difference = 0.62; 95% confidence interval = 0.06 to 1.17). Studies stimulating suprahyoid muscle groups revealed a negative standard mean difference of 0.17 (95% confidence interval = -0.42, 0.08), whereas large effect size was observed in studies stimulating the infrahyoid muscle groups (standard mean difference = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.47 to 1.30) and stimulating the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscle groups (standard mean difference = 1.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 1.74). Stimulation lasting 45 mins or less showed a large, significant pooled effect size (standard mean difference = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.58 to 1.20). The quality of evidences was rated as low to very low.

Conclusions

There is no firm evidence to conclude on the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on swallowing disorders. Larger-scale and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to reach robust conclusions.

SUBMITTER: Sun Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7343179 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sun Yuanyuan Y Chen Xiaoyun X Qiao Jianhong J Song Guixiang G Xu Yuedong Y Zhang Yan Y Xu Dongmei D Gao Wei W Li Yunfeng Y Xu Cuiping C

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 20200801 8

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on swallowing disorders.<h4>Design</h4>MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of science, and PEDro were searched from their earliest record to August 1, 2019. All randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trial were identified, which compared the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation plus traditional therapy with traditional therapy in swallowing ...[more]

PMID: 32209833

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDysphagia is one of the common complications after stroke. It is closely related to lung infection and malnutrition. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is widely used in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia, but the evidence-based medical evidence of NMES is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of NMES in patients with post-stroke dysphagia by systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NMES in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia from the establishment of the database to 9 June 2022. The risk of bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane and the GRADE method was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of evidence. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the intervention effect more specifically.ResultsA total of 46 RCTs and 3,346 patients with post-stroke dysphagia were included in this study. Our meta-analysis showed that NMES combined with routine swallowing therapy (ST) could effectively improve swallowing function in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (MD = -0.63, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.12], P = 0.01), Functional Oral Intake Scale (MD = 1.32, 95% CI [0.81, 1.83], P < 0.00001), Functional Dysphagia Scale (MD = - 8.81, 95% CI [-16.48, -1.15], P = 0.02), the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (MD = -6.39, 95% CI [-6.56, -6.22], P < 0.00001), the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (MD = 1.42, 95% CI [1.28, 1.57], P < 0.00001) and the Water swallow test (MD = -0.78, 95% CI [-0.84, -0.73], P < 0.00001). Furthermore, it could improve the quality of life (MD = 11.90, 95% CI [11.10, 12.70], P < 0.00001), increase the upward movement distance of hyoid bone (MD = 2.84, 95% CI [2.28, 3.40], P < 0.00001) and the forward movement distance of hyoid bone (MD = 4.28, 95% CI [3.93, 4.64], P < 0.00001), reduce the rate of complications (OR = 0.37, 95%CI [0.24, 0.57], P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses showed that NMES+ST was more effective at 25 Hz, 7 mA or 0-15 mA, and at courses ( ≤ 4 weeks). Moreover, patients with an onset of fewer than 20 days and those older than 60 years appear to have more positive effects after treatment.ConclusionNMES combined with ST could effectively increase the forward and upward movement distance of the hyoid bone, improve the quality of life, reduce the rate of complications, and improve the swallowing function of patients with post-stroke dysphagia. However, its safety needs to be further confirmed.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022368416.

Project description:BackgroundExercise-based swallowing training (EBST) and transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (TNMES) are common modalities used to treat late dysphagia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to investigate and compare the efficacies of EBST and TNMES as proactive treatments administered early after radiotherapy.MethodsPatients with early post-radiotherapy NPC (n = 120) underwent either TNMES or EBST. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), quality of life (QOL), and swallowing function questionnaires were completed before the intervention as well as immediately, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. Outcome measures included the scores for the swallowing function score (SFS), penetration and aspiration scale (PAS), dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST), functional oral intake scale (FOIS), swallowing performance status scale (SPSS), pharyngeal motor impairment (PMI), pharyngeal function impairment (PFI), and functional assessment after cancer therapy-nasopharyngeal (FACT-NP) questionnaire.ResultsThree months after radiotherapy, 31 and 34 patients underwent TNMES and EBST, respectively, and completed swallowing assessments at all four assessment timepoints. All patients showed post-radiotherapy impairments in the SFS, PAS, DIGEST, PMI, and PFI. Compared with the EBST group, the TNMES group showed significant improvements in the PFI and PMI scores, with small-to-medium effect sizes. Additionally, compared with the EBST group, the TNMES group demonstrated a trend toward slightly better improvements in the PAS, DIGEST, FOIS, and SPSS scores immediately and 6 months after the intervention. The SFS scores improved from baseline in both groups; however, the TNMES group showed an earlier improvement. Finally, the TNMES group showed better QOL according to the FACT-NP than the EBST group.ConclusionProactive TMNES and EBST are safe and feasible modalities for improving swallowing in patients with NPC when administered early after radiotherapy. Although TNMES showed better results than EBST, these results should be interpreted with caution given the study limitations.Level of evidence1B.

Project description:ObjectivesDysphagia in childhood has important health impacts for the child and their family as well as the healthcare system. This systematic review aims to determine the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in children.MethodsA search was performed on November 2020 in MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1947), PsycINFO (from 1806), CINAHL (from 1937), CENTRAL (from 1996) and Scopus (from 1970) databases. Studies of children (≤18 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia using NMES in the throat/neck region were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa assessment for observational studies. A meta-analysis was not conducted due to clinical heterogeneity in studies.ResultsTen studies were included (5 RCTs, 4 case series, 1 cohort study; including 393 children, mean or median age below 7 years, including children with neurologic impairments). In all studies, swallowing function improved after NMES treatment. The standardised mean difference (SMD) for improvement of swallowing dysfunction in treatment compared with control groups in the RCTs ranged from 0.18 (95% CI -0.7 to 1.06) to 1.49 (95% CI 0.57 to 2.41). Eight of 10 studies reported on the child's feeding ability, and, with one exception, there was improvement in feeding ability. Few studies reported on health status (N=2), impact on caregiver (N=1), adverse events and harms (N=2), and child's quality of life (N=1). In most studies, outcome follow-up was less than 6 months. The studies demonstrated moderate to high risk of bias.ConclusionsNMES treatment may be beneficial in improving swallowing function for children with dysphagia, however, given the quality of the studies, inadequate outcome reporting, and short follow-up duration, uncertainty remains. Well-designed RCTs are needed to establish its effectiveness before its adoption in clinical practice.Prospero registration numberCRD42019147353.

Project description:Background: No specific treatment is available for postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Recently, interest in the prevention of POCD during the perioperative period has increased. Although some studies suggest that transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) may be beneficial, the relevant evidence remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the preventive effects of TEAS on POCD. Methods: Seven databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were electronically searched up to April 2021. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, collected data, and assessed the risks of bias and grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations certainty of the evidence. A meta-analysis of the incidence of POCD, cognitive function score, pain, adverse reactions, and length of hospital stay after surgery was also performed. Results: Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with 1,994 participants were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the TEAS group has a significantly lower incidence of POCD compared with the control group on postoperative days 1 [OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.23, 0.47); p < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, moderate certainty], 3 [OR = 0.38 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.50); p < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, low certainty], and 7 [OR = 0.51 (95%CI: 0.32, 0.81); p = 0.005, I 2 = 0%, low certainty] but not on day 5 (p > 0.05, low certainty). Moreover, TEAS improved the Mini-Mental State Examination scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 [MD = 2.44 (95%CI: 1.61, 3.27); p < 0.001, I 2 = 93%, low certainty]; [MD = 2.07 (95%CI: 1.53, 2.62); p < 0.001, I 2 = 87%, low certainty]; and [MD = 0.49 (95%CI: 0.18, 0.79); p = 0.002, I 2 = 21%, low certainty], respectively, but not on day 5 (p > 0.05, very low certainty). TEAS promoted a postoperative analgesic effect within 24 h after surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving TEAS showed a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a shorter hospital stay. Conclusions: Limited evidence suggests that the application of TEAS in the perioperative period is associated with a reduced POCD rate and a protected early postoperative cognitive function.

Dataset Information

Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective

Design

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets