Extrinsic Convergent Validity Evidence to Prevent Jingle and Jangle Fallacies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: In psychology, there have been vast creative efforts in proposing new constructs and developing measures to assess them. Less effort has been spent in investigating construct overlap to prevent bifurcated literatures, wasted research efforts, and jingle-jangle fallacies. For example, researchers could gather validity evidence to evaluate if two measures with the same label actually assess different constructs (jingle fallacy), or if two measures with different labels actually assess the same construct (jangle fallacy). In this paper, we discuss the concept of extrinsic convergent validity, a source of validity evidence demonstrated when two measures of the same construct, or two measures of seemingly different constructs, have comparable correlations with external criteria. W
SUBMITTER: Gonzalez O
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7369230 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan-Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA