Dataset Information

Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk.

ABSTRACT: Nasogastric tube enteral nutrition (NGEN) should be initiated within 48 h for patients at high nutritional risk. However, whether small bowel enteral nutrition (SBEN) should be routinely used instead of NGEN to improve hospital mortality remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 113 critically ill patients with modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score ≥ 5 and feeding volume < 750 mL/day in the first week of their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, mNUTRIC score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were matched in the SBEN (n = 48) and NGEN (n = 65) groups. Through a univariate analysis, factors associated with hospital mortality were SBEN group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-1.00), Simplified Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), and energy intake achievement rate < 65% (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.25-5.11). A multivariate analysis indicated that energy intake achievement rate < 65% on the third follow-up day (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.12-4.69) was the only factor independently associated with mortality. We suggest initiation of SBEN on the seventh ICU day before parenteral nutrition initiation for critically ill patients at high nutrition risk.

SUBMITTER: Wang WN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7400848 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk.

Wang Wei-Ning WN Wang Chen-Yu CY Hsu Chiann-Yi CY Fu Pin-Kuei PK

Nutrients 20200706 7

Nasogastric tube enteral nutrition (NGEN) should be initiated within 48 h for patients at high nutritional risk. However, whether small bowel enteral nutrition (SBEN) should be routinely used instead of NGEN to improve hospital mortality remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 113 critically ill patients with modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score ≥ 5 and feeding volume < 750 mL/day in the first week of their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, mNUTRIC score, ...[more]

PMID: 32640749

Similar Datasets

Project description:Prior research has indicated that adopting strict glycemic control measures might elevate the risk of hypoglycemia and result in higher mortality rates among critically ill patients. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the incidence of hypoglycemia and its consequential outcomes in real-world clinical settings. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, utilizing critical care databases covering the period from 2015 to 2020. The objective was to examine the outcomes and identify risk factors associated with hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. Out of the total of 16,699 patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs), 2,115(12.7%) experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia were included in the analysis. Critically ill patients who developed hypoglycemia had a significantly higher hospital mortality rate compared to those who did not experience hypoglycemia. (48.9% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with more severe hypoglycemia exhibited a higher mortality rate (moderate hypoglycemia: hazard ratio [HR] 1.477, 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 1.351-1.614, p < 0.001; severe hypoglycemia: HR 1.847, 95% C.I. 1.607-2.123, p < 0.001) compared to those without hypoglycemia. Additionally, patients with greater frequency of hypoglycemic episodes also showed a higher mortality rate (one episode HR 1.504, 95% C.I. 1.366-1.657, p < 0.001; multiple episodes HR 1.613, 95% C.I. 1.444-1.801, p < 0.001) compared to those without hypoglycemia. Patient who experienced spontaneous hypoglycemia (53.9% vs. 42.4%, p < 0.001) and those without a prior diagnosis of diabetes (60.2% vs. 37.0%, p < 0.001) had higher mortality rate. Hypoglycemia frequently occurs and serves as an independent risk factor for mortality among critically ill individuals, particularly in cases of severe and recurrent episodes. Patients experiencing spontaneous hypoglycemia, as well as those lacking a diabetes diagnosis, demonstrated elevated mortality rates.

Project description:ImportanceMany patients who survive critical illness are left with laryngeal functional impairment from endotracheal intubation that permanently limits their recovery and quality of life. Although the risk for laryngeal injury increases with larger endotracheal tube sizes, there are no data delineating the association of smaller endotracheal tube sizes with survival or acute recovery from critical illness.ObjectiveTo determine if smaller endotracheal tubes are noninferior to larger endotracheal tubes with respect to critical illness outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsThis propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study included all adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department or intensive care unit and received mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hours from June 2020 to November 2020 at a single tertiary referral academic medical center.ExposuresEndotracheal intubation.Main outcomes and measuresPropensity score-matched analyses were performed with respect to the primary end point of 30-day all-cause in-hospital survival as well as the secondary end points of duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, mean peak inspiratory pressure, 30-day readmission, need for reintubation, and need for tracheostomy or gastrostomy tube placement.ResultsOverall, 523 participants (64%) were men and 291 (36%) were women. Of these, 814 patients were categorized into 3 endotracheal tube groups: small for height (n = 182), appropriate for height (n = 408), and large for height (n = 224). There was not a significant difference in 30-day all-cause in-hospital survival between groups ([HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7] for small vs appropriate; [HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6] for large vs appropriate). Patients with small-for-height endotracheal tubes had longer intubation durations (mean difference, 32.5 hrs [95% CI, 6.4-58.6 hrs]) compared with patients with appropriate-for-height tubes.Conclusions and relevanceDespite differences in intubation duration, the results of this cohort study suggest that smaller endotracheal tube sizes are not associated with impaired survival or recovery from critical illness. They support future prospective exploration of the association of smaller endotracheal tube sizes with recovery from critical illness.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk.

Publications

Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets