Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Caini S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7403641 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Caini Saverio S Bellerba Federica F Corso Federica F Díaz-Basabe Angélica A Natoli Gioacchino G Paget John J Facciotti Federica F De Angelis Simone Pietro SP Raimondi Sara S Palli Domenico D Mazzarella Luca L Pelicci Pier Giuseppe PG Vineis Paolo P Gandini Sara S
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 20200601 23
We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Random-effects models yielded a summary sensitivity of 82% for IgM, and 85% for IgG and total antibodies. For specificity, the pooled estimate were 98% for IgM and 99% for IgG and total antibodies. In populations with ≤ 5% of seroconverted individuals, unless the assays have perfect (i.e. 100%) specificity, the positive predictive value would be ≤ 88%. Serological tests should be used for prevalence surveys only in hard-hit are ...[more]