Dataset Information

Arts-led revitalization, overtourism and community responses: Ihwa Mural Village, Seoul

ABSTRACT: Arts-led revitalization projects are increasingly being undertaken in South Korean cities to improve residential areas in decline. One of the more common initiatives involves the beautification of residential neighbourhoods through mural art. Seoul's “Ihwa Mural Village” is one of the most representative examples of the murals-based regeneration trend. The residential area's transformation by artists in 2006 has made it one of the most popular murals tourism destinations, albeit to the displeasure of a segment of the local population. In 2016, two of Ihwa Village's most iconic murals were destroyed by several residents. This paper explores the context behind the incident through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. Our research reveals that the Ihwa mural incident was not simply a local reaction to overtourism, but also a response to the perceived unequal economic benefits accruing from the murals tourism. We offer recommendations for policy makers considering similar revitalization projects in residential neighbourhoods. Highlights • Seoul's Ihwa Mural Village is regarded as a benchmark for urban village regeneration in South Korea• The transformation of the disenfranchised residential area through art turned it into a tourist hotspot• Two of the area's most popular artworks were vandalized in 2016 by residents as a reaction to overtourism and other problems• Developments since the incident are addressed including conciliation efforts on the part of government and community members• Recommendations are made for policymakers contemplating the development of similar mural districts in residential environments

SUBMITTER: Park H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7419282 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionIn June 2021, United Nations (UN) Member States committed to ambitious targets for scaling up community-led responses by 2025 toward meeting the goals of ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030. These targets build on UN Member States 2016 commitments to ensure that 30% of HIV testing and treatment programmes are community-led by 2030. At its current pace, the world is not likely to meet these nor other global HIV targets, as evidenced by current epidemiologic trends. The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to further slow momentum made to date. The purpose of this paper is to review available evidence on the comparative advantages of community-led HIV responses that can better inform policy making towards getting the world back on track.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review to gather available evidence on peer- and community-led HIV responses. Using UNAIDS' definition of 'community-led' and following PRISMA guidelines, we searched peer-reviewed literature published from January 1982 through September 2020. We limited our search to articles reporting findings from randomized controlled trials as well as from quasi-experimental, prospective, pre/post-test evaluation, and cross-sectional study designs. The overall goals of this scoping review were to gather available evidence on community-led responses and their impact on HIV outcomes, and to identify key concepts that can be used to quickly inform policy, practice, and research.FindingsOur initial search yielded 279 records. After screening for relevance and conducting cross-validation, 48 articles were selected. Most studies took place in the global south (n = 27) and a third (n = 17) involved youth. Sixty-five percent of articles (n = 31) described the comparative advantage of peer- and community-led direct services, e.g., prevention and education (n = 23) testing, care, and treatment programs (n = 8). We identified more than 40 beneficial outcomes linked to a range of peer- and community-led HIV activities. They include improved HIV-related knowledge, attitudes, intentions, self-efficacy, risk behaviours, risk appraisals, health literacy, adherence, and viral suppression. Ten studies reported improvements in HIV service access, quality, linkage, utilization, and retention resulting from peer- or community-led programs or initiatives. Three studies reported structural level changes, including positive influences on clinic wait times, treatment stockouts, service coverage, and exclusionary practices.Conclusions and recommendationsFindings from our scoping review underscore the comparative advantage of peer- and community-led HIV responses. Specifically, the evidence from the published literature leads us to recommend, where possible, that prevention programs, especially those intended for people living with and disproportionately affected by HIV, be peer- and community-led. In addition, treatment services should strive to integrate specific peer- and community-led components informed by differentiated care models. Future research is needed and should focus on generating additional quantitative evidence on cost effectiveness and on the synergistic effects of bundling two or more peer- and community-led interventions.

Project description:BackgroundVillage health workers (VHWs) can serve as a valuable resource to address public health needs in resource-limited settings such as Uganda. However, the successful implementation of VHW programs can be limited by poor acceptability among community members. Kisoro District Hospital (KDH) in Kisoro District, Uganda operates a VHW program and, at the time of the study, was expanding its services to 11 additional villages.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate community perceptions of VHWs in villages of Kisoro District with no prior exposure to the KDH VHW program in order to improve community acceptance when expanding the program to additional villages.MethodsWe administered surveys to 658 community members from 11 villages to evaluate their perceptions of VHWs prior to receiving VHW services. Additionally, we conducted focus group discussions among 97 participants to explore perceptions of VHWs in further depth.FindingsCommunity members were generally accepting of VHWs. They preferred that VHWs provide both curative and preventive services across a broad range of health domains as opposed to a single disease. Expectations of the responsibilities of a VHW were influenced by agricultural occupational and household responsibilities, particularly for women. Participants expressed a preference to be actively involved in the selection and oversight of VHWs and that VHWs receive compensation.Conclusions1) Community members' expectations of VHWs are shaped by environmental, cultural, and social factors. 2) Active community engagement in the VHW program is key. 3) Aligning a VHW program with community perceptions may improve acceptance, in turn influencing effectiveness and sustainability. These findings were used to expand the KDH VHW Program into the participating villages in a manner consistent with community preferences. Our findings may provide guidance on enhancing the uptake of community-based VHW programs for VHW stakeholders and policymakers in other settings.

Dataset Information

Arts-led revitalization, overtourism and community responses: Ihwa Mural Village, Seoul

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets