Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Remdesivir for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Versus a Cohort Receiving Standard of Care.


ABSTRACT:

Background

We compared the efficacy of the antiviral agent, remdesivir, versus standard-of-care treatment in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using data from a phase 3 remdesivir trial and a retrospective cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 treated with standard of care.

Methods

GS-US-540-5773 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing two courses of remdesivir (remdesivir-cohort). GS-US-540-5807 is an ongoing real-world, retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (non-remdesivir-cohort). Inclusion criteria were similar between studies: patients had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, were hospitalized, had oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, and had pulmonary infiltrates. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the treatment effect of remdesivir versus standard of care. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with recovery on day 14, dichotomized from a 7-point clinical status ordinal scale. A key secondary endpoint was mortality.

Results

After the inverse probability of treatment weighting procedure, 312 and 818 patients were counted in the remdesivir- and non-remdesivir-cohorts, respectively. At day 14, 74.4% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had recovered versus 59.0% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.03: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-3.08, P < .001). At day 14, 7.6% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had died versus 12.5% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (aOR 0.38, 95% CI: .22-.68, P = .001).

Conclusions

In this comparative analysis, by day 14, remdesivir was associated with significantly greater recovery and 62% reduced odds of death versus standard-of-care treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.

Clinical trials registration

NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.

SUBMITTER: Olender SA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7454434 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Remdesivir for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Versus a Cohort Receiving Standard of Care.

Olender Susan A SA   Perez Katherine K KK   Go Alan S AS   Balani Bindu B   Price-Haywood Eboni G EG   Shah Nirav S NS   Wang Su S   Walunas Theresa L TL   Swaminathan Shobha S   Slim Jihad J   Chin BumSik B   De Wit Stéphane S   Ali Shamim M SM   Soriano Viladomiu Alex A   Robinson Philip P   Gottlieb Robert L RL   Tsang Tak Yin Owen TYO   Lee I-Heng IH   Hu Hao H   Haubrich Richard H RH   Chokkalingam Anand P AP   Lin Lanjia L   Zhong Lijie L   Bekele B Nebiyou BN   Mera-Giler Robertino R   Phulpin Chloé C   Edgar Holly H   Gallant Joel J   Diaz-Cuervo Helena H   Smith Lindsey E LE   Osinusi Anu O AO   Brainard Diana M DM   Bernardino Jose I JI  

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20211201 11


<h4>Background</h4>We compared the efficacy of the antiviral agent, remdesivir, versus standard-of-care treatment in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using data from a phase 3 remdesivir trial and a retrospective cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 treated with standard of care.<h4>Methods</h4>GS-US-540-5773 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing two courses of remdesivir (remdesivir-cohort). GS-US-540-5807 is an ongoing real-world, retrospective  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8244650 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10241383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7985289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7797739 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7538864 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7777983 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7256348 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7798965 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7575217 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7665324 | biostudies-literature