Rapid implementation of a mechanical chest compression device for in-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bhatnagar A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7455518 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Rapid implementation of a mechanical chest compression device for in-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bhatnagar Anish A Khraishah Haitham H Lee Jennifer J Hsu Douglas D Hayes Margaret M Joseph Bridgid B Moskowitz Ari A
Resuscitation 20200829
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10883626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveHigh-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation with chest compression is important for good neurologic outcomes during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Several types of mechanical chest compression devices have recently been implemented in Korean emergency medical services. This study aimed to identify the effect of prehospital mechanical chest compression device use on the outcomes of OHCA patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data drawn from the regional cardiac arrest registry in Daegu, Korea. This registry prospectively collected data from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients aged 18 years or older who experienced cardiac arrest presumed to have a medical etiology were included. The exposure variable was the use of a prehospital mechanical device during transportation by emergency medical technicians. The outcomes measured were neurologic outcomes and survival to discharge. Logistic regression analysis was used.ResultsAmong 3,230 OHCA patients, 1,111 (34.4%) and 2,119 (65.6%) were managed with manual chest compression and with a mechanical chest compression device, respectively. The mechanical chest compression group showed poorer neurologic outcomes than the manual chest compression group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.33) and decreased survival to discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.82) after adjustment for confounding variables.ConclusionPrehospital mechanical chest compression device use in OHCA was associated with poorer neurologic outcomes and survival to discharge compared to manual chest compression.
| S-EPMC9561205 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCardiac arrest (CA) is a serious threat to human health. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an effective treatment for CA. Early and high-quality CPR is closely related to the survival rate of patients with CA. But manual chest compression has a lot of defects. To solve the defects and improve the quality of CPR, mechanical CPR device was invented. However, it has still controversy whether manual chest compression or mechanical chest compression is better. This systematic review was aimed to investigate the difference in clinical outcomes between manual chest compression and Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS) assisted CPR in patients with out-hospital CA.MethodsOriginal research studies, conducted on adult out-of-hospital CA, were included. PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang database were searched from the setting to February 21, 2019. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was selected as effect scale index for evaluation of the difference in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and survival to 30 days. Random effects model was used in this study to estimate overall mean effects.ResultsA total of 6 articles, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled trials, were selected. And 8501 subjects were involved to analyze the clinical outcomes of LUCAS and manual chest compression for patients with out-hospital CA. Comparisons of ROSC (33.3% vs 33.0%, P = .98; OR = 1; 95% CI: [0.89,1.13]), survival to hospital admission (22.7% vs 24.3%, P = .32; OR = 0.86; 95% CI: [0.65,1.15]), survival to hospital discharge (8.6% vs 10.7%, P = .50; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: [0.73,1.17]), and survival to 30 days (7.5% vs 8.5%, P = .50; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: [0.73,1.17]) were made. No significant difference was found.ConclusionThe synthesis of available evidence does not support that mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device improves clinical outcome in out-of-hospital CA patients compared with manual chest compression. Large scale studies with improved designs are still needed in the future.
| S-EPMC6946388 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the association between chest compression rates and 1) arterial blood pressure and 2) survival outcomes during pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).MethodsProspective observational study of children ≥37 weeks gestation and <19 years old who received CPR in an intensive care unit (ICU) as part of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Quality of CPR Study (PICqCPR) of the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN). Arterial blood pressure and compression rate were determined from manually extracted arterial line waveform data during the first 10 min of CPR. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Modified Poisson regression models assessed the association between rate categories (80-<100, 100-120 [Guidelines], >120-140, >140) and outcomes.ResultsCompression rate data were available for 164 patients. More than half (98/164; 60%) were <1 year old. Return of circulation was achieved in 148/164 (90%); survival to hospital discharge in 77/164 (47%). Percentage of events with average rate within Guidelines was 32.9%. Compared to Guidelines, higher rate categories were associated with lower systolic blood pressures (>120-140, p = 0.010; >140, p = 0.077), but not survival. A rate between 80-<100 per minute was associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge (aRR 1.92, CI95 1.13, 3.29, p = 0.017) and survival with favorable neurological outcome (aRR 2.12, CI95 1.09, 4.13, p = 0.027) compared to Guidelines.ConclusionNon-compliance with compression rate Guidelines was common in this multicenter cohort. Among ICU patients, slightly lower rates were associated with improved outcomes compared to Guidelines.
| S-EPMC6170369 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeGuidelines for advanced life support of cardiac arrest (CA) emphasize continuous and effective chest compressions as one of the main factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) success. The use of an automated load distributing chest compression device for CPR is promising but initial studies on survival show contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of AutoPulse on blood pressure (BP) in out-of-hospital CA patients.MethodsThis prospective study included adult patients presenting with in refractory out-of-hospital CA. Invasive arterial BP produced by AutoPulse was compared to BP generated by manual CPR (Active Compression Decompression). Systolic, diastolic and mean BP and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded before and after initiating the automated band device for each patient. The comparison of diastolic BP produced by manual CPR versus automated chest compressions was the primary end point.ResultsHemodynamics in 29 patients are reported and analyzed. Median diastolic BP increased after starting AutoPulse from 17[11-25] mmHg to 23[18-28] mmHg (P < 0.001). Median systolic BP increased from 72[55-105] mmHg to 106[78-135] mmHg (P = 0.02). Mean BP increased from 29[25-38] mmHg to 36[30-15] mmHg (P = 0.002). On the other hand, End-Tidal CO(2) did not increase significantly with AutoPulse (21[13-36] vs. 22[12-35] mmHg, P = 0.80).ConclusionsIn patients with out-of-hospital CA, the use of AutoPulse is associated with an increased diastolic BP compared to manual chest compressions. While its benefit to survival has yet to be demonstrated, the increase in diastolic and mean BP is a promising outcome for AutoPulse use.
| S-EPMC2929359 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aimed to investigate the prognostic difference between AUTOPULSE and LUCAS for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) adult patients.A retrospective observational study was performed nationwide. Adult OHCA patients after receiving in-hospital mechanical chest compression from 2012 to 2016 were included. The primary outcomes were sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of more than 20 minutes and survival to discharge.Among 142,906 OHCA patients, 820 patients were finally included. In multivariate analysis, female (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.99), witnessed arrest (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.20-3.69), and arrest cause of non-cardiac origin (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62) were significantly associated with the increase in ROSC. LUCAS showed a lower survival than AUTOPULSE (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.84), although it showed no significant association with ROSC. Percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 6.30; 95% CI, 1.53-25.95) and target temperature management (TTM; OR, 7.30; 95% CI, 2.27-23.49) were the independent factors for survival. We categorized mechanical CPR recipients by witness to compare prognostic effectiveness of AUTOPULSE and LUCAS. In the witnessed subgroup, female (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89) was a prognostic factor for ROSC and shockable rhythm (OR, 5.04; 95% CI, 1.00-25.30), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 12.42; 95% CI, 2.04-75.53), and TTM (OR, 9.03; 95% CI, 1.86-43.78) for survival. In the unwitnessed subgroup, no prognostic factors were found for ROSC, and TTM (OR, 99.00; 95% CI, 8.9-1100.62) was found to be an independent factor for survival. LUCAS showed no significant increase in ROSC or survival in comparison with AUTOPULSE in both subgroups.The in-hospital use of LUCAS may have a deleterious effect for survival compared with AUTOPULSE.
| S-EPMC6855519 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe assessed the effectiveness of automated chest compression devices depending on the time of admission based on the frequency of iatrogenic chest injuries, the duration of in-hospital resuscitation efforts, and clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective historical control study of OHCA patients in Japan between 2015-2022. The patients were divided according to time of admission, where day-time was considered 07:00-22:59 and night-time 23:00-06:59. These patients were then divided into two categories based on the in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IHCPR) device: manual chest compression (mCC) group and automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) group. We used univariate and multivariate ordered logistic regression models adjusted for pre-hospital confounders to evaluate the impact of ACCD use during IHCPR on outcomes (IHCPR duration, CPR-related chest injuries, and clinical outcomes) in the day-time and night-time groups.ResultsAmong 1101 patients with OHCA (day-time, 809; night-time, 292), including 215 patients who underwent ACCD during IHCPR in day-time (26.6%) and 104 patients in night-time group (35.6%), the multivariate model showed a significant association of ACCD use with the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation and higher rates of return in spontaneous circulation, lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, longer in-hospital resuscitation durations, greater survival to Emergency Department and hospital discharge, and greater survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge, though only in the night-time group.ConclusionsPatients who underwent ACCD during in-hospital resuscitation at night had a significantly longer duration of in-hospital resuscitation, a lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, and better outcomes.
| S-EPMC10455266 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh quality chest compressions (CCs) are of crucial importance during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Currently, there are no clear evidences that the use of automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) are superior to manual CCs during out-of-hospital CPR. This study aimed to estimate if availability of ACCDs for two-man rescue teams had any impact on CPR efficiency and a rate of successful transport of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to emergency departments.MethodsThe study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. The research tool was the analysis of medical charts of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in one million agglomeration in Poland in 2018. ACCDs were available for two-man paramedical teams in a half of ambulances and this fact was criterion of group division [ACCD (n=181) and manual CC (MCC) (n=303)]. The following variables such as gender (male/female), age, area of intervention (town/countryside), return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) followed by successful transport to hospital were compared between subgroups.ResultsAmong 71,282 interventions in 2018, there were 484 resuscitations undertaken with complete medical data. ROSC and transport to hospital was achieved in 54.9% of individuals, statistically more often among ACCD subjects (63.5%) than those compressed manually (49.8%) (P=0.003). Moreover, the use of ACCD was associated with higher chances of ROSC in younger patients (P=0.027) and if cardiac arrest had place in the town centre (P=0.002).ConclusionsOur observation revealed that the use of ACCD in the pre-hospital emergency care involving two-man rescue teams may increase the prevalence of ROSC among OHCA patients.
| S-EPMC7330409 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Interruptions in chest compressions contribute to poor outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The objective of this retrospective observational cohort study was to characterize the frequency, reasons, and duration of interruptions in chest compressions and to determine if interruptions changed over time. Methods and Results All out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated by the Seattle Fire Department (Seattle, WA, United States) from 2007 to 2016 with capture of recordings from automated external defibrillators and manual defibrillators were included. Compression interruptions >1 second were classified into categories using audio recordings. Among the 3601 eligible out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, we analyzed 74 584 minutes, identifying 30 043 pauses that accounted for 6621 minutes (8.9% of total resuscitation duration). The median total interruption duration per case decreased from 115 seconds in 2007 to 72 seconds in 2016 (P<0.0001). Median individual interruption duration decreased from 14 seconds in 2007 to 7 seconds in 2016 (P<0.0001). Among interruptions >10 seconds, median interruption duration decreased from 20 seconds in 2007 to 16 seconds in 2016 (P<0.0001). Cardiac rhythm analysis accounted for most compression interruptions. Manual ECG rhythm analysis and pulse checks accounted for 41.6% of all interruption time (median individual interruption, 8 seconds), automated external defibrillator rhythm analysis for 13.7% (median, 17 seconds), and manual rhythm analysis and shock delivery for 8.0% (median, 9 seconds). Conclusions Median duration of chest compression interruptions decreased by half from 2007 to 2016, indicating that care teams can significantly improve performance. Reducing compression interruptions is an evidence-based benchmark that provides a modifiable process quality improvement goal.
| S-EPMC7335529 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Early insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) device could improve chest compression fraction by allowing providers to perform continuous chest compressions or by shortening the interruptions needed to deliver ventilations. SGA devices do not require the same expertise as endotracheal intubation. This study aimed to determine whether the immediate insertion of an i-gel® while providing continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations could generate higher CCFs than the standard 30:2 approach using a face-mask in a simulation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A multicentre, parallel, randomised, superiority, simulation study was carried out. The primary outcome was the difference in CCF during the first two minutes of resuscitation. Overall and per-cycle CCF quality of compressions and ventilations parameters were also compared. Among thirteen teams of two participants, the early insertion of an i-gel® resulted in higher CCFs during the first two minutes (89.0% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.001). Overall and per-cycle CCF were consistently higher in the i-gel® group, even after the 30:2 alternation had been resumed. In the i-gel® group, ventilation parameters were enhanced, but compressions were significantly shallower (4.6 cm vs. 5.2 cm, p = 0.007). This latter issue must be addressed before clinical trials can be considered.
| S-EPMC8745715 | biostudies-literature