Project description:Portable ultrasound is now used routinely in many ICUs for various clinical applications. Echocardiography performed by noncardiologists, both transesophageal and transthoracic, has evolved to broad applications in diagnosis, monitoring, and management of critically ill patients. This review provides a current update on focused critical care echocardiography for the management of critically ill patients.Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature, including the PubMed "related articles" search methodology.Although studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes for critically ill patients managed by focused critical care echocardiography are generally lacking, there is evidence to suggest that some intermediate outcomes are improved. Furthermore, noncardiologists can learn focused critical care echocardiography and adequately interpret the information obtained. Noncardiologists can also successfully incorporate focused critical care echocardiography into advanced cardiopulmonary life support. Formal training and proctoring are important for safe application of focused critical care echocardiography in clinical practice. Further outcomes-based research is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of focused critical care echocardiography.
Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has placed an extraordinary strain on healthcare systems across North America. Defining the optimal approach for managing a critically ill COVID-19 patient is rapidly changing. Goal-directed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is frequently used by physicians caring for intubated critically ill patients as a reliable imaging modality that is well suited to answer questions at bedside.MethodsA multidisciplinary (intensive care, critical care cardiology, and emergency medicine) group of experts in point-of-care echocardiography and TEE from the United States and Canada convened to review the available evidence, share experiences, and produce a consensus statement aiming to provide clinicians with a framework to maximize the safety of patients and healthcare providers when considering focused point-of-care TEE in critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsAlthough transthoracic echocardiography can provide the information needed in most patients, there are specific scenarios in which TEE represents the modality of choice. TEE provides acute care clinicians with a goal-directed framework to guide clinical care and represents an ideal modality to evaluate hemodynamic instability during prone ventilation, perform serial evaluations of the lungs, support cardiac arrest resuscitation, and guide veno-venous ECMO cannulation. To aid other clinicians in performing TEE during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe a set of principles and practical aspects for performing examinations with a focus on the logistics, personnel, and equipment required before, during, and after an examination.ConclusionsIn the right clinical scenario, TEE is a tool that can provide the information needed to deliver the best and safest possible care for the critically ill patients.
Project description:BackgroundCardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an under-recognized cause of heart failure. Left atrial (LA) myopathy contributes to a worse prognosis in heart failure and is a feature of transthyretin (ATTR) and light-chain (AL) CA. LA mechanical dispersion (LA-MD) is a novel marker of intra-atrial dyssynchrony implicated in LA myopathy and the future development of atrial fibrillation (AF).AimsThis study aimed to determine the characteristics and prognostic value of LA myopathy in ATTR and AL cardiomyopathy through a comprehensive LA echocardiographic evaluation.MethodsATTR (n = 86) and AL (n = 86) CA patients were compared with hypertensive heart disease (HHT) patients (n = 58). Transthoracic echocardiographic measurements including LA strain and LA-MD were obtained with patient follow-up for mortality.ResultsATTR and AL patients had a median follow-up of 66 months, with 26 mortality events. Left ventricular (LV) mass, diastolic function (average-e' and E/e'), LV global longitudinal strain, and LA volume and function (LA function index and strain) were more impaired in ATTR versus AL; these echocardiographic parameters were more impaired in both amyloid groups compared to HHT patients (P < 0.05). LA-MD was increased in ATTR versus AL [median 72.2 (inter-quartile range 55-88.9) vs. 54 (43.5-64.2), respectively, P < 0.001]. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, presence of AF, LV mass, global and basal strain, and E/e' demonstrated that LA-MD was an independent determinant of ATTR CA (P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, LA reservoir strain was independently associated with the presence of heart failure in the CA group (P < 0.001). LA minimum volume (cut-off ≥18 mL/m2) was a determinant of mortality in AL CA [Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) 1.042 (1.003-1.082), P = 0.034 and Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.016].ConclusionCharacterizing LA myopathy has significant diagnostic and prognostic utility in CA. ATTR patients have increased atrial dyssynchrony, which may have implications for AF development. LA reservoir strain was associated with heart failure in CA, whilst LA minimum volume was a predictor of mortality in AL CA.
Project description:ObjectivesTo summarize the literature on prevalence, impact, and contributing factors related to diagnostic error in the PICU.Data sourcesSearch of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2019.Study selectionStudies on diagnostic error and the diagnostic process in pediatric critical care were included. Non-English studies with no translation, case reports/series, studies providing no information on diagnostic error, studies focused on non-PICU populations, and studies focused on a single condition/disease or a single diagnostic test/tool were excluded.Data extractionData on research design, objectives, study sample, and results pertaining to the prevalence, impact, and factors associated with diagnostic error were abstracted from each study.Data synthesisUsing independent tiered review, 396 abstracts were screened, and 17 studies (14 full-text, 3 abstracts) were ultimately included. Fifteen of 17 studies (88%) had an observational research design. Autopsy studies (autopsy rates were 20-47%) showed a 10-23% rate of missed major diagnoses; 5-16% of autopsy-discovered diagnostic errors had a potential adverse impact on survival and would have changed management. Retrospective record reviews reported varying rates of diagnostic error from 8% in a general PICU population to 12% among unexpected critical admissions and 21-25% of patients discussed at PICU morbidity and mortality conferences. Cardiovascular, infectious, congenital, and neurologic conditions were most commonly misdiagnosed. Systems factors (40-67%), cognitive factors (20-3%), and both systems and cognitive factors (40%) were associated with diagnostic error. Limited information was available on the impact of misdiagnosis.ConclusionsKnowledge of diagnostic errors in the PICU is limited. Future work to understand diagnostic errors should involve a balanced focus between studying the diagnosis of individual diseases and uncovering common system- and process-related determinants of diagnostic error.
Project description:BackgroundThree cases of the application of focused cardiac ultrasound in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 are presented.MethodsCardiac point-of-care ultrasound, limited transthoracic echocardiography, and critical care echocardiography were applied in cases of heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and myocarditis with thrombus respectively.ResultsThe impact on patient management and the global context of each presentation are discussed.ConclusionsFocused cardiac point-of-care ultrasound played an important, front-line role in the bedside management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China.
Project description:BackgroundAmerican Indians face significant barriers to diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. We sought to develop a real-world implementation model for improving access to echocardiography within the Indian Health Service, the American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership.Methods and resultsThe American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership was implemented and evaluated via a 4-step process of characterizing the system where it would be instituted, building point-of-care echocardiography capacity, deploying active case finding for structural heart disease, and evaluating the approach from the perspective of the clinician and patient. Data were collected and analyzed using a parallel convergent mixed methods approach. Twelve health care providers successfully completed training in point-of-care echocardiography. While there was perceived usefulness of echocardiography, providers found it difficult to integrate screening point-of-care echocardiography into their workday given competing demands. By the end of 12 months, 6 providers continued to actively utilize point-of-care echocardiography. Patients who participated in the study felt it was an acceptable and effective approach. They also identified access to transportation as a notable challenge to accessing echocardiograms. Over the 12-month period, a total of 639 patients were screened, of which 36 (5.6%) had a new clinically significant abnormal finding.ConclusionsThe American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership model exhibited several promising strategies to improve access to screening echocardiography for American Indian populations. However, competing priorities for Indian Health Service providers' time limited the amount of integration of screening echocardiography into outpatient practice. Future endeavors should explore community-based solutions to develop a more sustainable model with greater impact on case detection, disease management, and improved outcomes.
Project description:BackgroundAlthough pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) have been the reference standard for calculating cardiac output, echocardiographic estimation of cardiac output (CO) by cardiologists has shown high accuracy compared to PAC measurements. A few studies have assessed the accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of CO in critically ill patients by intensivists with basic training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CO measurements by intensivists with basic training using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound vs. PACs in critically ill patients.MethodsCritically ill patients who required hemodynamic monitoring with a PAC were eligible for the study. Three different intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training obtained three measurements of CO on each patient. The maximum of three separate left-ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements and the mean of three LVOT velocity time integral measurements were used. The inter-observer reliability and correlation of CO measured by PACs vs. critical care echocardiography were assessed.ResultsA total of 20 patients were included. Data were analyzed comparing the measurements of CO by PAC vs. echocardiography. The inter-observer reliability for measuring CO by echocardiography was good based on a coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.6 (95% CI 0.48-0.86, p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement between the two techniques were acceptable (0.64 ± 1.18 L/min, 95% limits of agreement of - 1.73 to 3.01 L/min). In patients with CO < 6.5 L/min, the agreement between CO measured by PAC vs. echocardiography improved (0.13 ± 0.89 L/min; 95% limits of agreement of - 1.64 to 2.22 L/min). The mean percentage of error between the two methods was 17%.ConclusionsCritical care echocardiography performed at the bedside by intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training is an accurate and reproducible technique to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Project description:PurposeTo assess the role of left ventricular overload and cumulated fluid balance in the development weaning-induced pulmonary edema (WIPO).MethodsVentilated patients in sinus rhythm with COPD and/or heart failure (ejection fraction ≤ 40%) were studied. Echocardiography was performed immediately before and during a 30-min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) using a T-tube. Patients who failed were treated according to echocardiography results before undergoing a second SBT.ResultsTwelve of 59 patients failed SBT, all of them developing WIPO. Patients who succeeded SBT had lower body weight (- 2.5 kg [- 4.8; - 1] vs. + 0.75 kg [- 2.95; + 5.57]: p = 0.02) and cumulative fluid balance (- 2326 ml [- 3715; + 863] vs. + 143 ml [- 2654; + 4434]: p = 0.007) than those who developed WIPO. SBT-induced central hemodynamic changes were more pronounced in patients who developed WIPO, with higher E wave velocity (122 cm/s [92; 159] vs. 93 cm/s [74; 109]: p = 0.017) and E/A ratio (2.1 [1.2; 3.6] vs. 0.9 [0.8; 1.4]: p = 0.001), and shorter E wave deceleration time (85 ms [72; 125] vs. 147 ms [103; 175]: p = 0.004). After echocardiography-guided treatment, all patients who failed the first SBT were successfully extubated. Fluid balance was then negative (- 2224 ml [- 7056; + 100] vs. + 146 ml [- 2654; + 4434]: p = 0.005). Left ventricular filling pressures were lower (E/E': 7.3 [5; 10.4] vs. 8.9 [5.9; 13.1]: p = 0.028); SBT-induced increase in E wave velocity (+ 10.6% [- 2.7/ + 18] vs. + 25.6% [+ 12.7/ + 49]: p = 0.037) and of mitral regurgitation area were significantly smaller.ConclusionIn high-risk patients, WIPO appears related to overloaded left ventricle associated with excessive fluid balance. SBT-induced central hemodynamic changes monitored by CCE help in guiding therapy for successful weaning.
Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate whether early intensive care transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can improve the prognosis of patients with mechanical ventilation (MV).DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingPatients undergoing MV for more than 48 hours, based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), were selected.Participants2931 and 6236 patients were recruited from the MIMIC-III database and the eICU database, respectively.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality from the date of ICU admission, days free of MV and vasopressors 30 days after ICU admission, use of vasoactive drugs, total intravenous fluid and ventilator settings during the first day of MV.ResultsWe used propensity score matching to analyse the association between early TTE and in-hospital mortality and sensitivity analysis, including the inverse probability weighting model and covariate balancing propensity score model, to ensure the robustness of our findings. The adjusted OR showed a favourable effect between the early TTE group and in-hospital mortality (MIMIC: OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94, p=0.01; eICU-CRD: OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86, p<0.01). Early TTE was also associated with 30-day mortality in the MIMIC database (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88, p=0.001). Furthermore, those who had early TTE had both more ventilation-free days (only in eICU-CRD: 23.48 vs 24.57, p<0.01) and more vasopressor-free days (MIMIC: 18.22 vs 20.64, p=0.005; eICU-CRD: 27.37 vs 28.59, p<0.001) than the control group (TTE applied outside of the early TTE and no TTE at all).ConclusionsEarly application of critical care TTE during MV is beneficial for improving in-hospital mortality. Further investigation with prospectively collected data is required to validate this relationship.