Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
We previously demonstrated that the high heterogeneity of response to computerized Auditory Training (AT) in psychosis can be ascribed to individual differences in sensory processing efficiency and neural plasticity. In particular, we showed that Auditory Processing Speed (APS) serves as a behavioral measure of target engagement, with faster speed predicting greater transfer effects to untrained cognitive domains. Here, we investigate whether the ability of APS to function as a proxy for target engagement is unique to AT, or if it applies to other training interventions, such as Executive Functioning Training (EFT). Additionally, we examine whether changes in APS are durable after these two forms of training.Methods
One hundred and twenty-five participants with R
SUBMITTER: Biagianti B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7484996 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature