Limitations of the particle immunofiltration assay test for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Warkentin TE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7496181 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Limitations of the particle immunofiltration assay test for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Warkentin Theodore E TE Cook Richard J RJ Greinacher Andreas A
American journal of hematology 20200701 9
Similar Datasets
Project description:Reliable laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a major clinical concern. Immunoassays are highly sensitive, while confirmatory functional tests (based on heparin-dependent platelet activation) lack standardization. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a functional flow cytometric assay (FCA) based on the detection of heparin-dependent platelet activation with an anti-p-selectin. A total of 288 patients were included (131 HIT-positive and 157 HIT-negative) with a HIT diagnosis established by expert opinion adjudication (EOA) considering clinical data and local laboratory results. The FCA was centrally performed in a single laboratory on platelet-rich plasma, using a very simple four-color fluorometer. The results were standardized according to the Heparin Platelet Activation (HEPLA) index. The serotonin release assay (SRA) was performed in the four French reference laboratories. Based on the final HIT diagnosis established by EOA, the sensitivity and specificity of the FCA were 88 and 95%, respectively, values very similar to those of the SRA (88 and 97%, respectively). This study showed that the FCA, based on easily implementable technology, may be routinely used as a reliable confirmatory test for HIT diagnosis.
| S-EPMC8064483 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The use of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) to determine spectral markers for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a difficult-to-diagnose immune-related complication that often leads to limb ischemia and thromboembolism, is proposed. The ability to produce distinct molecular signatures without the addition of labels enables unbiased inquiry and makes SERS an attractive complementary diagnostic tool. A capillary-tube-derived SERS platform offers ultrasensitive, label-free measurement as well as efficient handling of blood serum samples. This shows excellent reproducibility, long-term stability and provides an alternative diagnostic rubric for the determination of HIT by leveraging machine-learning-based classification of the spectroscopic data. We envision that a portable Raman instrument could be combined with the capillary-tube-based SERS analytical tool for diagnosis of HIT in the clinical laboratory, without perturbing the existing diagnostic workflow.
| S-EPMC7547846 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEarly recognition and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are key to prevent severe complications.ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic performance of rapid immunoassays (IA) in detecting anti-PF4/heparin-antibodies.MethodsDiagnostic performances of lateral-flow IA (LFIA; STic Expert HIT) and latex IA (LIA; HemosIL HIT-Ab) were analyzed in pilot (n = 74) and derivation cohorts (n = 267). Two novel algorithms based on the combination of HIT clinical probability with sequentially performed LIA and chemiluminescent IA (CLIA; HemosIL AcuStar-HIT-IgG) were compared with published rapid diagnostic algorithms: the "Lausanne algorithm" sequentially combining CLIA and particle-gel IA (PaGIA) and the "Hamilton algorithm" based on simultaneously performed LIA and CLIA.ResultsLFIA missed 6/30 HIT. The sensitivity and specificity of LIA were 90.9% and 93.5%. The Lausanne algorithm correctly predicted HIT in 19/267 (7.1%), excluded it in 240/267 (89.9%), leaving 8/267 (3%) cases unsolved. The algorithm sequentially combining CLIA and LIA predicted HIT in 19/267 (7.1%) with 1/19 wrong prediction, excluded it in 236/267 (88.4%), leaving 11/267 (4.1%) cases unsolved. The algorithm employing LIA as a first assay predicted HIT in 22/267 (8.2%), excluded it in 235/267 (88%), leaving 9/267 (3.4%) cases unsolved. Finally, the Hamilton algorithm correctly predicted HIT in 10/267 (3.7%), excluded it in 229/267 (85.7%), leaving 28/267 (10.5%) cases unsolved.ConclusionLFIA cannot be used to exclude or predict HIT when using frozen plasma. A Bayesian approach sequentially employing two rapid immunoassays for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies is most effective for the accurate diagnosis of HIT. Based on retrospective data, the combination LIA/CLIA is a candidate for a prospective validation.
| S-EPMC9796930 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent diagnostic clarification. However, knowledge of the diagnostic utility of the recommended diagnostic tests is limited in clinical practice.ObjectiveTo evaluate the current diagnostic practice for managing the suspicion of HIT.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective diagnostic study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2021 among consecutive patients with suspected HIT from 11 study centers in Switzerland, Germany, and the United States. Detailed clinical data and laboratory information were recorded. Platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies were quantified using an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). A washed-platelet heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test was used as a reference standard to define HIT.ExposuresSuspicion of HIT.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the 4Ts score, the CLIA, and the recommended algorithm serially combining both tests.ResultsOf 1448 patients included between 2018 and 2021, 1318 were available for the current analysis (median [IQR] age, 67 [57-75] years; 849 [64.6%] male). HIPA was positive in 111 patients (prevalence, 8.4%). The most frequent setting was intensive care unit (487 [37.0%]) or cardiovascular surgery (434 [33.0%]). The 4Ts score was low risk in 625 patients (46.8%). By 2 × 2 table, the numbers of patients with false-negative results were 10 (9.0%; 4Ts score), 5 (4.5%; CLIA), and 15 (13.5%; recommended diagnostic algorithm). The numbers of patients with false-positive results were 592 (49.0%; 4Ts score), 73 (6.0%; CLIA), and 50 (4.1%; recommended diagnostic algorithm), respectively.Conclusions and relevanceIn this diagnostic study of patients suspected of having HIT, when the recommended diagnostic algorithm was used in clinical practice, antibody testing was required in half the patients. A substantial number of patients were, however, still misclassified, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or overtreatment. Development of improved diagnostic algorithms for HIT diagnosis should be pursued.
| S-EPMC10966416 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10332759 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse reaction characterized by anti-PF4-heparin antibody generation and hypercoagulability. Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) provides a detailed morphological analysis of platelets, which change upon activation. We evaluated IFC-derived morphometric features to detect platelet activation and developed a functional assay for HIT diagnosis. We analysed blood samples from 42 patients with suspected HIT and extracted platelet size, shape and texture features using IFC. The morphological features were compared with CD62P expression, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and a serotonin release assay (SRA) in terms of their ability to predict a HIT diagnosis. Five IFC-derived morphological features (area, circularity, contrast, diameter and major axis) significantly distinguished resting from activated platelets. The major axis feature performed best for HIT diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 89.3% and a specificity of 92.9% versus functional assays (LTA/SRA); this diagnostic performance was similar to that of CD62P expression on the same platelet donors. The area and diameter had similar specificity (92.9%) and a slightly lower sensitivity (85.7%). The morphological features associated with platelet activation might be effective markers for the diagnosis of HIT, matching platelet CD62P expression assay performance. The high-throughput IFC exploration of platelet activation offers new perspectives in label-free analysis and time-saving.
| S-EPMC11829136 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The risk for developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in healthy individuals is thought to be low, but monitoring recommendations remain controversial. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify the incidence of thrombocytopenic events in a healthy research population exposed and re-exposed to continuous intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin. The Division of Sleep Medicine and the Centre for Clinical Investigations at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, instituted a standardized platelet monitoring procedure for all research protocols that involved heparin to detect platelet count decreases. Protocol-related frequent blood sampling required use of continuous IV unfractionated heparin infusion (5,000 unit/L in 0.45% saline at 40 mL/h) to maintain line patency over extended periods of IV access. From the years 2009 to 2012, a total of 273 healthy volunteers enrolled in Sleep Medicine research protocols met study criteria as having been exposed and/or re-exposed to continuously infused intravenous heparin for at least 4 hours. The mean continuous heparin exposure time was 88 ± 82 SD hours with a total of 397 heparin exposure and re-exposure events. Platelet count measurements were obtained on 629 occasions, representing a range from 2 to 9 draws per participant. No platelet count decrease of more than 50% was detected. There were no detected adverse bleeding or thrombotic events. In this retrospective study of healthy volunteers involved in a rigorously applied inpatient platelet monitoring protocol, heparin exposure and re-exposure did not lower platelet concentration and, therefore, does not appear to be associated with increased risk of HIT in this population.
| S-EPMC6524859 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDiagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of HIT expert probability (HEP) and 4T scores, and to evaluate the inter-observer reliability for the 4T score in a clinical setting.MethodsThis prospective study included HIT-suspected patients between 2016 and 2018. Three hematologists assessed the HEP and 4T scores. Correlations between scores and anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin antibodies were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive accuracy of these two scoring models. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the inter-observer agreement of 4T scores between residents and hematologists.ResultsOf the 89 subjects included, 22 (24.7%) were positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibody. The correlations between antibody titer and either HEP or 4T scores were similar (r = 0.392, P < 0.01 for the HEP score; r = 0.444, P < 0.01 for the 4T score). No significant difference in the diagnostic performance was displayed between these two scores (AUC for the HEP score: 0.778 vs. AUC for the 4T score: 0.741, P = 0.357). Only 72 4T scores were collected from the residents, with a surprisingly low percentage of observers (43.1%) presenting the four individual item scores which made up their 4T score. The AUC of 4T score assessed by residents and hematologists was 0.657 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 536-0.765) and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.667-0.869, P < 0.05), respectively. The ICC of 4T score between residents and hematologists was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29-0.65, P < 0.01), demonstrating a fair inter-observer agreement.ConclusionsThe HEP score does not display a better performance for predicting HIT than the 4T score. With the unsatisfactory completion rate, the inter-observer agreement of 4T score in a tertiary hospital is fair, underscoring the necessity for continuing education for physicians.
| S-EPMC6629329 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7405086 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlmost without exception, patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT) have antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) in a complex with heparin; however, many heparin-treated patients without HIT are also antibody-positive. A platelet activation test, the serotonin release assay (SRA), is useful for identifying a subset of antibodies that are platelet-activating and most likely to cause HIT. However, this "gold standard" assay for HIT diagnosis is technically demanding and is routinely available only through referral laboratories, limiting its availability for timely diagnosis and management.MethodsWe compared the diagnostic performance of the SRA with that of a technically simple platelet activation assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), which uses platelets pretreated with PF4 as targets for antibody detection. Archived serum samples from 91 patients for whom clinical information (HIT 4Ts [thrombocytopenia, timing of platelet count fall, thrombosis, and other causes of thrombocytopenia] score) was available were used. Patients with an intermediate 4Ts score and a PF4 ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) optical density ≥ 2.0, or a high 4Ts score and a PF4 ELISA optical density ≥ 1.0, were considered HIT positive; others were designated HIT negative.ResultsThe PEA had higher diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.92 vs 0.82; P = .02) than the SRA, using this definition of HIT. Eleven of 16 serum samples that were PEA positive and SRA negative were HIT positive. Studies done with identical target platelets and serially diluted samples from patients with HIT showed that the PEA is inherently more sensitive than the SRA for the detection of platelet-activating antibodies.ConclusionsThe PEA is technically less demanding than the SRA and may be more accurate for the diagnosis of HIT.
| S-EPMC5028397 | biostudies-literature