Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).


ABSTRACT:

Background

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a recently developed technique and can be performed during water-aided or ordinary colonoscopy for the treatment of colorectal polyps. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR in comparison with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) of small non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Methods

Patients with small size, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (4-9 mm in size) who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were enrolled in this multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups, an UEMR group and a CEMR group. Efficacy and safety were compared between groups.

Results

In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the complete resection rate was 83.1% (59/71) in the UEMR group and 87.3% (62/71) in the CEMR group. The en-bloc resection rate was 94.4% (67/71) in the UEMR group and 91.5% (65/71) in the CEMR group (difference 2.9%; 90% CI - 4.2 to 9.9%), showed noninferiority (noninferiority margin - 5.7% < - 4.2%). No significant difference in procedure time (81 s vs. 72 s, P = 0.183) was observed. Early bleeding was observed in 1.4% of patients in the CEMR group (1/71) and 1.4% of patients in the UEMR group (1/71). None of the patients in the UEMR group complained of postprocedural bloody stool, whereas two patients in the CEMR group (2/64) reported this adverse event.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that UEMR is safer and just as effective as CEMR in En-bloc resection for the treatment of small colorectal polyps as such, UEMR is recommended as an alternative approach to excising small and non-pedunculated colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03833492 . Retrospectively registered on February 7, 2019.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7510164 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).

Zhang Zhixin Z   Xia Yonghong Y   Cui Hongyao H   Yuan Xin X   Wang Chunnian C   Xie Jiarong J   Tong Yarong Y   Wang Weihong W   Xu Lei L  

BMC gastroenterology 20200923 1


<h4>Background</h4>Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a recently developed technique and can be performed during water-aided or ordinary colonoscopy for the treatment of colorectal polyps. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR in comparison with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) of small non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with small size, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (4-9 mm in size) who u  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10051202 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10417738 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11842907 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10318795 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7508646 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6823098 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10871961 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11731078 | biostudies-literature
| 57538 | ecrin-mdr-crc
| S-EPMC10919657 | biostudies-literature