Dataset Information

Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Aim/background

The commonly used fistula-in-ano classifications, Park or St. James's University hospital(SJUH), neither grade fistulas as per their severity nor guide regarding their management. A new classification(NC), published in 2017, proposed to classify fistulas as per their severity and also guided in its management. The early grades (NC grade I & II) were simple fistulas and were amenable to fistulotomy whereas higher grades (NC grade III-V) were complex fistulas and were not amenable to fistulotomy.

Methods

Lower grades of all the three classifications were classified as simple (Parks: I, SJUH:I-II, NC:I-II) whereas higher grades were classified as complex (Parks: II-IV, SJUH: III-V, NC: III-V) fistulas. Fistulotomy should be possible in simple fistulas but not in complex fistulas. This was analysed for all these classifications. The long-term follow-up of continence was done by an objective scoring system (Vaizey's scores).

Results

The SJUH & Parks classifications categorized 504/828 fistulas as 'complex' which was quite inaccurate as 42.7%(215/504) of these fistulas were safely amenable to fistulotomy. On the other hand, the New classification (NC) classified 282/828 fistulas as 'complex' which was very accurate as 99% (279/282) of these were actually complex and were not amenable to fistulotomy. The change in the preoperative and the postoperative continence scores in the patients who underwent fistulotomy, as per these classifications, Parks & SJUH vs NC, was 0.064 ± 0.62 and 0.089 ± 0.85 respectively and was not significantly different(p = 0.80, Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions

The New classification(NC) seems better than the existing classifications for grading the disease as well as in guiding the management of the disease.

SUBMITTER: Garg P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7522535 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study.

Garg Pankaj P

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) 20200919

<h4>Aim/background</h4>The commonly used fistula-in-ano classifications, Park or St. James's University hospital(SJUH), neither grade fistulas as per their severity nor guide regarding their management. A new classification(NC), published in 2017, proposed to classify fistulas as per their severity and also guided in its management. The early grades (NC grade I & II) were simple fistulas and were amenable to fistulotomy whereas higher grades (NC grade III-V) were complex fistulas and were not am ...[more]

PMID: 33014360

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives The main aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of recurrent and treatment-naïve fistula-in-ano and to correlate imaging findings with anal sphincter morphology in recurrent fistula-in-ano. Methods This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent MRI for suspected fistula-in-ano in 2018. After excluding patients with alternative diagnosis, patients were stratified into recurrent ( n = 103) and treatment-naïve ( n = 106) fistula-in-ano groups. Two blinded radiologists reread MRI scans in consensus for fistula characteristics and anal sphincter morphology. We compared imaging features of recurrent and treatment-naïve fistula-in-ano, assessed the incidence of anal sphincter scarring among patients with recurrent fistula-in-ano, and studied its association with fistula features. Results Two-hundred nine patients (187 males) with mean age of 40.6 (standard deviation: 12.2) years were included. Trans-sphincteric, inter-sphincteric, extra-sphincteric, and supra-sphincteric fistula-in-ano were seen in 63.6, 33, 2.9, and 0.5%, respectively. There were secondary tracts, supralevator extension, and secondary cause for fistula in 49.3, 12.9, and 14.8%, respectively. There was no difference between the fistula features of recurrent and treatment-naïve fistula-in-ano, except for significantly fewer external openings among recurrent fistula-in-ano ( p = 0.005). Among patients with recurrent fistula-in-ano, MRI detected anal sphincter defect/scarring was seen in 53.4% ( n = 55) and was significantly associated with posterior fistula-in-ano ( p = 0.031), collections and/or supralevator extension ( p = 0.010), and secondary tracts ( p = 0.015). Conclusion Fistula features of recurrent and treatment-naïve patients were mostly similar. There was high incidence (53.4%) of MRI-identified anal sphincter scarring/defect among recurrent fistula-in-ano, which was significantly associated with posterior fistula, collections, supra or translevator extension, and secondary tracts. Key Points MRI-identified anal sphincter scarring is very common among patients with recurrent fistula-in-ano and seen in more than half of them.There was significantly higher incidence of sphincter scarring among patients who had posterior fistula, collections, supralevator/translevator extension, and secondary tracts.

Dataset Information

Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study.

Aim/background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets