Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for non-maturing native arteriovenous fistulas according to the approach route (arterial vs. venous).

Methods

Eighty-five patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for non-maturing fistulas (63 radiocephalic and 22 brachiocephalic) between 2010 and 2019. Outcome variables such as procedural success, complications, and primary and secondary patency rates were analyzed from the patients' demographic, angiographic, clinical, and hemodialysis records according to the approach route (venous access group, n = 53 and arterial access group, n = 32). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patency rates.

Results

The mean duration from fistula creation to fistulography was

SUBMITTER: Lee SM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7523969 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature