Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To compare macular choroidal thickness of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and fellow eyes, and before and after vitrectomy in terms of the morphological features on spectral-domain optical coherent tomography (SD-OCT).Methods
Eighty-four patients with unilateral idiopathic ERM were involved. Patients were categorized into: Group 1, ERM without membrane contraction; Group 2, ERM with membrane contraction and retinal folding; and Group 3, ERM with membrane contraction and macular edema. Twenty-two patients received surgical removal of ERM. Choroidal thickness was compared between ERM and fellow eyes, and before and after treatment.Results
Mean choroidal thickness was significantly greater in ERM eyes than in fellow eyes (234.4 ± 22.5 vs 220.6 ± 20.8 μm; P<0.01). Group 1 (n = 20) showed no significant difference in choroidal thickness between ERM and fellow eyes. Eyes in Group 2 (n = 27) and Group 3 (n = 37) showed statistically significant differences in mean choroidal thickness between ERM and fellow eyes (229.6 ± 23.8 vs 220.8 ± 19.6 μm; 242.6 ± 27.8 vs 221.0 ± 21.8 μm, respectively; P<0.05). In Group 2 (n = 8) and Group 3 (n = 16), choroidal thickness in ERM eyes decreased significantly at 1 month and 6 months after surgery, compared with that before surgery (P<0.05 for all comparisons).Conclusions
Membrane contraction contributed to the increase in choroidal thickness in idiopathic ERM patients. This finding may help to elucidate the pathophysiologic features of idiopathic ERM as well as the response to treatment in these patients.
SUBMITTER: Fang IM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7523999 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
PloS one 20200929 9
<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare macular choroidal thickness of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and fellow eyes, and before and after vitrectomy in terms of the morphological features on spectral-domain optical coherent tomography (SD-OCT).<h4>Methods</h4>Eighty-four patients with unilateral idiopathic ERM were involved. Patients were categorized into: Group 1, ERM without membrane contraction; Group 2, ERM with membrane contraction and retinal folding; and Group 3, ERM with membrane contraction ...[more]