Are all voices heard in the COVID-19 debate?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has vast global consequences. Yet, effective mitigation strategies and economic and medical outfall differ extensively across the globe. It is currently unclear how well researchers from all continents are represented in the unsolicited and solicited publications. A literature review was performed in SCOPUS on COVID-19 oriented publications in the four most impactful medical journals. These included the British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet. We identified 809 eligible publications out of identified 924 records. The vast majority of publications on COVID-19, in the four can be considered European (47.7%) or North-American (37.3%) research. Chinese reports were relatively common (8.8%); h
SUBMITTER: Benjamens S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7547813 | biostudies-literature | 2021
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA