Dataset Information

Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is no consensus regarding superiority between gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR) techniques to implant total knee arthroplasties. In a multicenter setup, we compared both techniques using the same prosthesis.

Methods

We included 262 balanSys posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties from 4 centers: 3 using the MR (n = 162) and one using the GB technique (n = 100), without navigation.

Results

There was no significant difference in the Knee Society Score or visual analog scale pain at 2- and 7-year follow-up. The visual analog scale for satisfaction was significantly better in the MR group at 2 but not at 7 years. We found a significantly higher average valgus in the GB group, but the overall alignment was within 2° of neutral on the full-leg radiographs. There were no significant differences concerning radiolucency and survival.

Conclusions

We found no significant differences in the functional outcome, pain, alignment, or survival, but a tendency toward better function using MR and better survival with GB.

SUBMITTER: De Wachter E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7551640 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

De Wachter Eva E Vanlauwe Johan J Krause Robert R Bayer-Helms Hans H Ganzer Dirk D Scheerlinck Thierry T

Arthroplasty today 20201005 4

<h4>Background</h4>There is no consensus regarding superiority between gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR) techniques to implant total knee arthroplasties. In a multicenter setup, we compared both techniques using the same prosthesis.<h4>Methods</h4>We included 262 balanSys posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties from 4 centers: 3 using the MR (n = 162) and one using the GB technique (n = 100), without navigation.<h4>Results</h4>There was no significant difference in the Knee S ...[more]

PMID: 33083508

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis meta-analysis was designed to compare the accuracy of soft tissue balancing and femoral component rotation as well as change in joint line positions, between the measured resection and gap balancing techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty.MethodsStudies were included in the meta-analysis if they compared soft tissue balancing and/or radiologic outcomes in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with the gap balancing and measured resection techniques. Comparisons included differences in flexion/extension, medial/lateral flexion, and medial/lateral extension gaps (LEGs), femoral component rotation, and change in joint line positions. Finally, 8 studies identified via electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) and manual searches were included. All 8 studies showed a low risk of selection bias and provided detailed demographic data. There was some inherent heterogeneity due to uncontrolled bias, because all included studies were observational comparison studies.ResultsThe pooled mean difference in gap differences between the gap balancing and measured resection techniques did not differ significantly (-0.09 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.40 to +0.21 mm; P = 0.55), except that the medial/LEG difference was 0.58 mm greater for measured resection than gap balancing (95% CI: -1.01 to -0.15 mm; P = 0.008). Conversely, the pooled mean difference in femoral component external rotation (0.77°, 95% CI: 0.18° to 1.35°; P = 0.01) and joint line change (1.17 mm, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.52 mm; P < 0.001) were significantly greater for the gap balancing than the measured resection technique.ConclusionThe gap balancing and measured resection techniques showed similar soft tissue balancing, except for medial/LEG difference. However, the femoral component was more externally rotated and the joint line was more elevated with gap balancing than measured resection. These differences were minimal (around 1 mm or 1°) and therefore may have little effect on the biomechanics of the knee joint. This suggests that the gap balancing and measured resection techniques are not mutually exclusive.

Project description:IntroductionRecently, some studies showed assessment of the component gap is important for determination of the implant-inserted condition during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We perform the modified gap technique with adjustment of the virtual gap which estimated by computer-aided design (CAD) using navigation system. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual gap (CAD-gap) with the actual gap after inserting a femoral trial component (Trial-gap), and examine the usefulness of the surgical technique.Materials and methodsThe subjects were 35 patients who underwent primary TKA using a navigation system and posterior-stabilized type TKA. The surgical procedure was to produce an extension gap, confirm the flexed CAD-gap on the navigation screen based on CAD data, and plan osteotomy of the femur. After osteotomy, the femoral component was inserted and the gap balance was measured. A tensor was used to adjust and measure the gap balance. Initial alignment, rotation of the femoral component, soft tissue balance in extension, final alignment after fixing all components, and the CAD- and Trial-gaps in both extension and flexion were evaluated.ResultsThe mean initial alignment angle, rotation angle of the femoral component, soft tissue balance angle and final alignment angle were 8.1 ± 4.2° varus, 3.5 ± 1.3°external rotation, 2.7 ± 2.5° varus and 0.4 ± 1.4° varus respectively. The mean medial and lateral CAD-gaps in extension were 10.8 ± 2.5 and 13.7 ± 2.5 mm, and the mean medial and lateral CAD-gaps in flexion were 12.2 ± 2.2 and 13.9 ± 2.7 mm. The equivalent Trial-gaps in extension and flexion were 10.5 ± 2.6 and 11.4 ± 3.1 mm, and 12.2 ± 2.5 and 14.4 ± 2.8 mm. The CAD- and Trial-gaps differed significantly only for lateral gaps in extension.ConclusionIn comparing the CAD-gap and the Trial-gap, only small difference was found in the lateral gap of extension. The other gaps in both extension and flexion were well maintained. We concluded adjustment of the CAD-gap during surgery using a navigation system can be used to adjust the actual component gap especially in the medial side.

Project description:BackgroundSoft-tissue releases are commonly necessary to achieve symmetrical flexion and extension gaps in primary total knee arthroplasty performed with a measured resection technique. We reviewed the frequency of required releases according to preoperative alignment and the clinical and radiographic results; associations with failure, reoperations, and complications are presented.MethodsWe reviewed 1216 knees that underwent primary total knee arthroplasty from 2004 to 2009; 774 (64%) were in female patients and 442 (36%), in male patients. In the coronal plane, 855 knees had preoperative varus deformity, 123 were neutral, and 238 had valgus deformity. The mean age at the time of the index procedure was 62.7 years (range, twenty-three to ninety-four years), and the mean body mass index was 32.7 kg/m² (range, 17.4 to 87.9 kg/m²). Clinical outcomes included the Knee Society Score (KSS), implant failure, reoperation, and complications. Radiographs were analyzed for component alignment.ResultsThe only difference in the total KSS was found at the time of final follow-up between valgus knees with zero releases (total KSS = 178) and those with one or two releases (KSS = 160, p = 0.026). Overall, 407 knees (33.5%) required zero releases, 686 (56.4%) required one or two releases, and 123 (10.1%) required three or more releases. Among varus knees, 37% required zero releases, 55% required one or two releases, and 7.5% required three or more releases. Among neutral knees, 39% required zero releases, 55% required one or two releases, and 5.7% required three or more releases. Only 17% of valgus knees required zero releases whereas 61% required one or two releases and 21.8% required three or more releases. Valgus knees required more releases than neutral or varus knees did (p < 0.001).ConclusionsSelective soft-tissue release for gap balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty is an effective technique that produced excellent clinical and radiographic results regardless of preoperative alignment. Consistent anatomic coronal-plane alignment and soft-tissue balance could be achieved without bone cut modification by using measured bone resection and selective soft-tissue release.

Dataset Information

Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets