Limitations of the Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with performance status 1.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yu JH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7575991 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Limitations of the Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with performance status 1.
Yu Jung Hwan JH Lee Jin-Woo JW
Annals of translational medicine 20200901 17
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAccurate staging is necessary for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis and guiding patient management. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system has limitations due to heterogeneity observed among patients in BCLC stages B and C. In contrast, the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system offers more aggressive treatment strategies.AimTo compare the prognostic performance of HKLC and BCLC staging systems in Egyptian patients with HCC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study at the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt, on 1015 HCC patients. Data was collected from patients' medical records over 10 years (from 2008 to 2018). The BCLC and HKLC stages were identified, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare patients' overall survival rates within each staging system. Additionally, we evaluated the comparative prognostic performance of the two staging systems.ResultsHepatitis C was identified as the underlying etiology in 799 patients (78.7%), hepatitis B in 12 patients (1.2%), and non-viral causes in 204 patients (20.1%). The survival analysis demonstrated significant differences across the various stages within both the BCLC and HKLC systems. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated a marginally superior performance of the HKLC system in predicting survival at 1, 2, and 3 years compared to the BCLC system. Furthermore, the HKLC staging provided a slightly enhanced prognostic capability, particularly for patients classified under BCLC stages B and C, suggesting a potential survival benefit.ConclusionHKLC classification had a slightly better prognostic performance than BCLC staging system and may offer a survival advantage for certain patients with HCC in BCLC stage B and C HCC cases.
| S-EPMC11409554 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of the current study was to identify biomarkers that correlate with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We downloaded 4 gene expression datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo), and screened for genes that were differentially expressed between HCC and normal liver tissues, using significance analysis of the microarray algorithm. We used a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify hub genes that correlate with BCLC staging, functional enrichment analysis to associate hub genes with their functions, protein-protein interaction network analysis to identify interactions among hub genes, UALCAN analysis to assess gene expression levels based on tumour stage, and survival analyses to clarify the effects of hub genes on patients' overall survival (OS). We identified 50 relevant hub genes using WGCNA; among them, 13 genes (including TIGD5, C8ORF33, NUDCD1, INSB8, and STIP1) correlated with OS and BCLC staging. Significantly enriched gene ontology biological process terms included RNA processing, non-coding RNA processing and phosphodiester bond hydrolysis, and 6 genes were found to interact with 10 or more hub genes. We identified several candidate biomarkers that correlate with BCLC staging and OS of HCC. These genes might be used for prognostic assessment and selection of HCC patients for surgery, especially those with intermediate or advanced disease.
| S-EPMC6107203 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBarcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B (intermediate stage) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly heterogeneous; thus, identifying the most effective treatment for individual patients represents a significant clinical challenge. However, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the only recommended treatment option. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient characteristics and outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for BCLC stage B HCC.MethodsA total of 516 patients with BCLC stage B HCC who underwent LDLT (n=104) or did not undergo LDLT (non-LDLT; n=412) between 2004 to 2018 were analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM; 1:4) analysis. Factors influencing overall survival (OS) and recurrence were analyzed using Cox's proportional hazards models.ResultsPatients treated with LDLT achieved better OS than the non-LDLT group, including liver- and non-liver related survival (all P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed age >60 years (P=0.006), a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >4 (P=0.016) and >3 locoregional therapies (LRT) before LDLT (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence. In addition, age >60 years (P<0.001) and >3 LRT before LDLT (P=0.001) were independent risk factors for OS. Using a combination of age, NLR, and LRT before liver transplantation (LT), the patients can be divided into low-risk (none of risk), intermediate-risk (one of risk), and high risk (more than two of risk) groups. There were significant differences in the cumulative HCC recurrence (P<0.001) and mortality (P<0.001) rates among the three groups.ConclusionsLDLT may represent a valuable therapeutic option for selected patients with BCLC stage B HCC.
| S-EPMC10129878 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: For patients with complete response (CR) of Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is no consensus regarding the monitoring strategy. Optimal surveillance strategies that can detect early progression of HCC within a limited visit after treatment have not yet been investigated. A retrospective, real-world study was conducted to investigate surveillance strategies for BCLC stage B HCC (BBHCC) patients with CR after curative treatment to support clinical decision making. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2019, 546 BBHCC patients with CR after radical treatment were collected at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Seventy percent of patients were subjected to the train cohort randomly; the remaining patients comprised the validation cohort to verify the proposed arrangements. The random survival forest method was applied to calculate the disease progression hazard per month, and follow-up schedules were arranged to maximize the capability of progression detection at each visit. The primary endpoint of the study was the delayed-detection months for disease progression. Results: The cumulative 1, 2, and 3-years risk-adjusted probabilities for the train/validation cohorts were 32.8%/33.7%, 54.0%/56.3%, and 64.0%/67.4%, respectively, with peaks around approximately the 9th month. The surveillance regime was primarily concentrated in the first year posttreatment. The delayed-detection months gradually decreased when the total follow-up times increased from 6 to 11. Compared with controls, our schedule reduced delayed detection. Typically, the benefits of our surveillance regimes were obvious when the patients were followed seven times according to our schedule. The optional schedules were 5, 7, 9, 11, 17, 23, and 30 months. Conclusion: The proposed new surveillance schedule may provide a new perspective concerning follow-up for BBHCC patients with CR.
| S-EPMC8447402 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7607098 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib after curative resection for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThirty-four HCC patients, classified as BCLC-stage C, received adjuvant sorafenib for high-risk of tumor recurrence after curative hepatectomy at a tertiary care university hospital. The study group was compared with a case-matched control group of 68 patients who received curative hepatectomy for HCC during the study period in a 1:2 ratio.ResultsThe tumor recurrence rate was markedly lower in the sorafenib group (15/34, 44.1%) than in the control group (51/68, 75%, P = 0.002). The median disease-free survival was 12 mo in the study group and 10 mo in the control group. Tumor number more than 3, macrovascular invasion, hilar lymph nodes metastasis, and treatment with sorafenib were significant factors of disease-free survival by univariate analysis. Tumor number more than 3 and treatment with sorafenib were significant risk factors of disease-free survival by multivariate analysis in the Cox proportional hazards model. The disease-free survival and cumulative overall survival in the study group were significantly better than in the control group (P = 0.034 and 0.016, respectively).ConclusionOur study verifies the potential benefit and safety of adjuvant sorafenib for both decreasing HCC recurrence and extending disease-free and overall survival rates for patients with BCLC-stage C HCC after curative resection.
| S-EPMC4910659 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study compared the prognostic significance of staging between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study population comprised patients with liver cancer registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2007 to 2013 and was followed up until December 31, 2016. The study included patients with HCC, with known staging in both TNM and BCLC systems, and with follow-up >1 month. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were constructed to investigate the significance of staging by two systems. Goodness-of-fit of model was evaluated via Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the lower the better. Among 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer, a total of 37,062 patients with HCC (25.6% underwent surgery) were eligible. The mean age and overall survival of this cohort were 63.9 years and 27.2%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages I, II, III, and IV (the TNM system) were 54.5%, 34.9%, 10.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages A, B, C, and D (the BCLC classification) were 54.5%, 29.2%, 9.8%, and 4.0%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 59.4 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both systems predicted overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free rate well. Values of ΔAIC of the BCLC classification and the TNM system were lower for the surgery group and nonsurgery group, respectively. The TNM system (8th edition) predicted long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification in patients with HCC. But in patients treated initially with surgery, the BCLC classification outperformed the 8th edition of the TNM system. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates that the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) system (8th edition) and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification both predict long-term outcome significantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but that the TNM system (8th edition) predicts long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification. For patients treated initially with surgery, BCLC classification outperforms in 8th edition TNM system in predicting long-term outcome.
| S-EPMC7930404 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveSelective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) represents an endovascular treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its use is widely recognized in the intermediate and advanced HCC, but it has become more prevalent in recent years in different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of SIRT and its clinical implications through different stages of HCC.MethodsA literature review of papers on this topic was performed using PubMed MEDLINE, focusing exclusively on the role of yttrium-90 SIRT across all BCLC stages and comparing it with other treatments. Only English-language papers currently available until September 2023 were considered.Key content and findingsMany studies have shown that SIRT is a promising tool with multiple uses, such as tumour control in the context of bridge-to-liver transplantation or resection, tumour downstaging, and curative therapy in selected patients. Therefore, according to the recent update of BCLC staging system criteria, SIRT now emerges as a potential curative treatment for early-stage HCC patients, serving as an alternative when ablation or resection is not feasible. It is also a promising treatment compared to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as well as in combination with immunotherapies.ConclusionsSIRT is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients at all BCLC stages of HCC. Therefore, due to its numerous advantages, SIRT may prove useful in many complex HCC treatment situations in the near future.KeywordsHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); radioembolization; yttrium-90 (90Y); selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT); transarterial radioembolization (TARE).
| S-EPMC11634413 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The nomogram of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) has accurate outcome prediction. This study aims to propose a treatment-integrated nomogram derived from BCLC for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 3,371 patients were randomly grouped into derivation (n = 2,247) and validation (n = 1,124) sets. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to generate the nomogram from tumor burden, cirrhosis, performance status (PS) and primary anti-cancer treatments. Concordance indices and calibration plots were used to evaluate the performance of nomogram. The derivation and validation sets had the same concordance index of 0.774 (95% confidence intervals: 0.717-0.826 and 0.656-0.874, respectively). In calibration plots, survival distributions predicted by the nomogram and observed by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar at 3- and 5-year for patients from derivation and validation sets. Validation group patients divided into 10 subgroups by the original and new treatment-integrated BCLC nomogram were used to evaluate the prognostic performance of integrating primary anti-cancer treatments. Compared to the nomogram of original BCLC system, the treatment-integrated nomogram of BCLC system had larger linear trend and likelihood ratio X2. In conclusion, based on the results of concordance index tests, integrating primary anti-cancer treatments into the BCLC system provides similar discriminatory ability.
| S-EPMC5554253 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7859792 | biostudies-literature