Dataset Information

Embedding research recruitment in a community resource e-prescribing system: lessons from an implementation study on Chicago's South Side.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The study sought to implement and assess the CommunityRx e-prescribing system to recruit research participants from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black community on Chicago's South Side.

Materials and methods

CommunityRx integrates with electronic medical record systems to generate a personalized list of health-promoting community resources (HealtheRx). Between December 2015 and December 2016, HealtheRxs distributed at outpatient visits to adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease also incentivized participation in a pulmonary research registry. Usual practices for registry recruitment continued in parallel.

Results

Focus groups established acceptability and appropriateness among the target population. Pulmonary research registry recruitment information was included on 13 437 HealtheRxs. Forty-one (90% non-Hispanic Black) patients responded with willingness to participate and 9 (8 non-Hispanic Black) returned a signed consent required to enroll. Usual recruitment practices enrolled 4 registrants (1 non-Hispanic Black).

Discussion

Automating research recruitment using a community e-prescribing system is feasible.

Conclusions

Implementation of an electronic medical record-integrated, community resource referral tool promotes enrollment of eligible underrepresented research participants; however, enrollment was low.

SUBMITTER: Feldmeth G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7587152 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Embedding research recruitment in a community resource e-prescribing system: lessons from an implementation study on Chicago's South Side.

Feldmeth Gillian G Naureckas Edward T ET Solway Julian J Lindau Stacy Tessler ST

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 20190801 8-9

<h4>Objective</h4>The study sought to implement and assess the CommunityRx e-prescribing system to recruit research participants from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black community on Chicago's South Side.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>CommunityRx integrates with electronic medical record systems to generate a personalized list of health-promoting community resources (HealtheRx). Between December 2015 and December 2016, HealtheRxs distributed at outpatient visits to adults with asthma or chronic ob ...[more]

PMID: 31181137

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUnderstanding the relationship between hypertension and spatial accessibility of primary care can inform interventions to improve hypertension control and awareness, especially among disadvantaged populations. This study aims to investigate the association between spatial accessibility of primary care and hypertension control and awareness.MethodsParticipant data from the COMPASS (Chicago Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study) between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed. All participants were geocoded. Locations of primary care providers in Chicago were obtained from MAPSCorps. A score was generated for spatial accessibility of primary care using an enhanced 2-step floating catchment area method. A higher score indicates greater accessibility. Measured hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio and 95% CI for hypertension status in relation to accessibility score quartiles.ResultsFive thousand ninety-six participants (mean age, 53.4±10.8) were included. The study population was predominantly non-Hispanic black (84.0%), over 53% reported an annual household income <$15 000, and 37.3% were obese. Measured hypertension prevalence was 78.7% in this population, among which 37.7% were uncontrolled and 41.0% were unaware. A higher accessibility score was associated with lower measured hypertension prevalence. In fully adjusted models, compared with the first (lowest) quartile of accessibility score, the odds ratio strengthened from 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-1.01) for the second quartile to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.91) for the third quartile, and further to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60-0.89) for the fourth (highest) quartile. The increasing trend had a P<0.01. Similar associations were observed for both uncontrolled and unaware hypertensions. When stratified by neighborhood socioeconomic status, a higher accessibility score was associated with lower rates of unaware hypertension in both disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged neighborhoods.ConclusionsBetter spatial accessibility of primary care is associated with improved hypertension awareness and control.

Project description:BackgroundRecruitment of patients is one of the main challenges when designing and conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Trials of rare injuries or those that include surgical interventions pose added challenges due to the small number of potentially eligible patients and issues with patient preferences and surgeon equipoise. We explore key issues to consider when recruiting to orthopaedic surgical trials from the perspective of staff and patients with the aim of informing the development of strategies to improve recruitment in future research.DesignTwo qualitative process evaluations of a UK-wide orthopaedic surgical RCT (ACTIVE) and mixed methods randomised feasibility study (PRESTO). Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted and data was analysed thematically.SettingNHS secondary care organisations throughout the UK. Interviews were undertaken via telephone.ParticipantsThirty-seven health professionals including UK-based spinal and orthopaedic surgeons and individuals involved in recruitment to the ACTIVE and PRESTO studies (e.g. research nurses, surgeons, physiotherapists). Twenty-two patients including patients who agreed to participate in the ACTIVE and PRESTO studies (n=15) and patients that declined participation in the ACTIVE study (n=7) were interviewed.ResultsWe used a mixed methods systematic review of recruiting patients to randomised controlled trials as a framework for reporting and analysing our findings. Our findings mapped onto those identified in the systematic review and highlighted the importance of equipoise, randomisation, communication, patient's circumstances, altruism and trust in clinical and research teams. Our findings also emphasised the importance of considering how eligibility criteria are operationalised and the impact of complex patient pathways when recruiting to surgical trials. In particular, the influence of health professionals, who are not involved in trial recruitment, on patients' treatment preferences by suggesting they would receive a certain treatment ahead of recruitment consultations should not be underestimated.ConclusionsA wealth of evidence exploring factors affecting recruitment to randomised controlled trials exists. A methodological shift is now required to ensure that this evidence is used by all those involved in recruitment and to ensure that existing knowledge is translated into methods for optimising recruitment to future trials.Trial registrationACTIVE: ( ISRCTN98152560 ). Registered on 06/03/2018. PRESTO: ( ISRCTN12094890 ). Registered on 22/02/2018.

Project description:BackgroundAlmost 20 million children under one year of age did not receive basic vaccines in 2019, and most of these children lived in low- and middle-income countries. Implementation research has been recognized as an emerging area that is critical to strengthen the implementation of interventions proven to be effective. As a component of strengthening implementation, WHO has called for greater embedding of research within decision-making processes. One strategy to facilitate the embedding of research is to engage decision-makers as Principal Investigators of the research. Since 2015, the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research within the WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund have supported decision-maker led research by partnering with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, in an initiative called "Decision-Maker Led Implementation Research". This synthesis paper describes the cross-cutting lessons from the initiative to further understand and develop future use of the decision-maker led strategy.MethodsThis study used qualitative methods of data collection, including a document review and in-depth interviews with decision-makers and researchers engaged in the initiative. Document extraction and thematic content analysis were applied. The individual project was the unit of analysis and the results were summarized across projects.ResultsResearch teams from 11 of the 14 projects participated in this study, for an overall response rate of 78.6%. Most projects were carried out in countries in Africa and conducted at the sub-state or sub-district level. Seven enablers and five barriers to the process of conducting the studies or bringing about changes were identified. Key enablers were the relevance, acceptability, and integration of the research, while key barriers included unclear results, limited planning and support, and the limited role of a single study in informing changes to strengthen implementation.ConclusionsDecision-maker led research is a promising strategy to facilitate the embedding of research into decision-making processes and contribute to greater use of research to strengthen implementation of proven-effective interventions, such as immunization. We identified several lessons for consideration in the future design and use of the decision-maker led strategy.

Dataset Information

Embedding research recruitment in a community resource e-prescribing system: lessons from an implementation study on Chicago's South Side.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Publications

Embedding research recruitment in a community resource e-prescribing system: lessons from an implementation study on Chicago's South Side.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets