Laparoendoscopic single port transvesical repair of an iatrogenic vesicouterine fistula. A three-year follow-up.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Przudzik M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7587495 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Laparoendoscopic single port transvesical repair of an iatrogenic vesicouterine fistula. A three-year follow-up.
Przudzik Maciej M Borowik Michał M Łesiów Mirosław M Łesiów Roman R Roslan Marek M
Central European journal of urology 20200704 3
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6338807 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9326706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVaFs) are relatively uncommon in developed countries but with devastating consequences for the women suffering them. Conservative management has a low response rate. The surgical repair is a technically demanding procedure. Transvaginal, open transabdominal or laparoscopic (pure or robot-assisted) approaches have been described with similar post-operative results. We report two real-life cases of VVaF after surgery of benign gynaecological conditions, both presenting with continuous urinary incontinence and repaired with laparoscopic surgery. The first case had a simple tract above the trigone and was managed with an extravesical approach. The second is a complex case with multiple fistulous tracts that required a transabdominal-transvesical approach (modified O'Connor technique). Both patients have their fistula closed and are continent after surgery with a mean follow-up of 9 months. Given the lack on evidence for the selection of the best approach, it is important to report the outcomes with the different surgical techniques in both simple and complex fistulae. A pre-operative exhaustive study of the location and number of fistulous tracts is essential, as well as selecting the technique which best allows tissue dissection and tension-free suture to get a successful closure. Therefore, knowledge of several procedures and approaches is mandatory when dealing with this disorder.
| S-EPMC8575560 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOur study addresses the gap in ventral hernia repair literature, regarding the long-term effectiveness of robotic transabdominal retrorectus umbilical prosthetic repair (r-TARUP) for primary and incisional ventral hernias. This study aimed to report the 3-year recurrence rates and overall patient outcomes including quality of life.MethodA retrospective review of prospective collected data analyzed 101 elective r-TARUP patients from August 2018 to January 2022. Data collected included demographics, hernia sizes, mesh types, postoperative outcomes and the European Hernia Society Quality of Life questionnaire (EuraHS-QoL) before and after surgery.ResultsThe average age of the group of patients was 53, having a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m, with 54% incisional and 46% primary hernias, with mean length and width of 4.4 cm and 6.1 cm, utilizing synthetic 58% and bioabsorbable 42% mesh types. The majority were classified as Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class I wounds. Postoperative complications included seroma (2%), hematoma (3%), which required surgical intervention, with no significant correlation to mesh type. A strong positive correlation was found between Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and increased length of hospital stay (correlation coefficient: 0.731, p < 0.001). Preoperative quality of life assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements when compared to postoperative assessments at 3 years, with a mean (±SD) of 61.61 ± 5.29 vs. 13.84 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001). Mean follow up of 34.4 months with no hernia recurrence at 1 year and 3 recurrence at the 2-3 years follow up (3.2%).ConclusionThe r-TARUP technique has proven to be safe and effective for repairing primary and incisional ventral hernias, with a low recurrence rate during this follow up period with a noticeable improvement in quality of life (QoL).
| S-EPMC11222322 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo investigate the outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) compared to multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy (m-LA).MethodsStudies comparing LESS-A with m-LA were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before June 2020. Post-operative pain, resumption outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. We conducted meta-analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model. Subset analyses were conducted according to peritoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. A small study effect was illustrated using funnel plots and Egger's test.ResultsOne randomized controlled trial (RCT) and nineteen retrospective cohort studies involving 1554 patients were included for analyzed. Pooled analysis showed that LESS-A had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (MD -0.77, 95%CI -1.45 to -0.10) and less pain medication used (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.91) compared to m-LA. Besides, LESS-A had significantly shorter hospital stays (MD -0.75, 95%CI -1.18 to -0.33), shorter duration of oral intake resumption (MD -0.33, 95%CI -0.60 to -0.06), and better cosmetic satisfaction (SMD 1.15, 95%CI 0.21 to -2.09). As for perioperative outcomes, LESS-A led to significant longer operative time (MD 13.43, 95%CI 4.08 to 22.77). No significant differences were observed in terms of the remaining perioperative outcomes.ConclusionsLESS-A is associated with less post-operative pain and quicker recovery duration. However, the longer operative time of LESS-A compared with m-LA is a drawback.
| S-EPMC8170104 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLaparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery is performed to further narrow the incisions and reduce tissue injury. It has been more than10 years since the surgery was first described. However, there is still no report on the results of 10-year follow-up. This study evaluated the use of long-term oncology and the renal outcomes of LESS radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN) in the treatment of localized renal cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients treated with LESS-RN at Changhai Hospital from 2009 to 2012. Patients with localized kidney cancer who were followed-up for at least 10 years were included in the study. The baseline data and major perioperative outcome variables were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included in the study, which had a median follow-up of 11 years (interquartile range, 10.7-11.8 years). The 10-year OS and CSS rates were 87.5% [42/48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.778-0.972] and 97.9% (47/48; 95% CI: 0.937-1.021), respectively. At the most recent follow-up, there were 5 patients with a chronic kidney disease stage ≥3. Among these 5 patients, 3 developed uremia and required continuous dialysis.ConclusionsFor localized renal cancer, LESS-RN is safe and effective with excellent long-term oncology controllability and good functional outcomes. Prospective studies with large sample sizes need to be conducted to validate our results.
| S-EPMC9906104 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6352618 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5692099 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Sarcoidosis + Follow-up 6 month after Keywords = sarcoidosis Keywords = follow-up Keywords: other
2005-01-18 | GSE1907 | GEO
Project description:IntroductionTo describe laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney.Case presentationCase 1: a 58-year-old female with fever was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography demonstrated a markedly atrophic right kidney and mild hydronephrosis. Case 2: a 64-year-old male with a history of several intra-abdominal surgeries visited our hospital with a complaint of left back pain and fever. Computed tomography demonstrated left marked hydronephrosis, thinning of renal parenchyma, and duplicated inferior vena cava. After antibiotic treatment, transperitoneal reduced port simple nephrectomy and retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy were performed in Case 1 and 2, respectively, because the function of the affected kidney was almost lost on renography. Although adhesion was slightly noted around the renal hilum in Case 1, neither conversion to laparotomy nor placement of additional ports was needed.ConclusionLaparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney may be options for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
| S-EPMC8088899 | biostudies-literature