Improving clinical trial interpretation with ACCEPT analyses.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Clements MN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7613267 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Improving clinical trial interpretation with ACCEPT analyses.
Clements Michelle N MN White Ian R IR Copas Andrew J AJ Cornelius Victoria V Cro Suzie S Dunn David T DT Quartagno Matteo M Turner Rebecca M RM Tweed Conor D CD Walker A Sarah AS
NEJM evidence 20220726 8
Similar Datasets
Project description:Small insertions and deletions (indels) are critical yet challenging genetic variations with significant clinical implications. However, the identification of pathogenic indels from neutral variants in clinical contexts remains an understudied problem. Here, we developed INDELpred, a machine-learning-based predictive model for discerning pathogenic from benign indels. INDELpred was established based on key features, including allele frequency, indel length, function-based features, and gene-based features. A set of comprehensive evaluation analyses demonstrated that INDELpred exhibited superior performance over competing methods in terms of computational efficiency and prediction accuracy. Importantly, INDELpred highlighted the crucial role of function-based features in identifying pathogenic indels, with a clear interpretability of the features in understanding the disease-causing variants. We envisage INDELpred as a desirable tool for the detection of pathogenic indels within large-scale genomic datasets, thereby enhancing the precision of genetic diagnoses in clinical settings.
| S-EPMC11321314 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImproving the clinical interpretation of missense variants can increase the diagnostic yield of genomic testing and lead to personalised management strategies. Currently, due to the imprecision of bioinformatic tools that aim to predict variant pathogenicity, their role in clinical guidelines remains limited. There is a clear need for more accurate prediction algorithms and this study aims to improve performance by harnessing structural biology insights. The focus of this work is missense variants in a subset of genes associated with X linked disorders.MethodsWe have developed a protein-specific variant interpreter (ProSper) that combines genetic and protein structural data. This algorithm predicts missense variant pathogenicity by applying machine learning approaches to the sequence and structural characteristics of variants.ResultsProSper outperformed seven previously described tools, including meta-predictors, in correctly evaluating whether or not variants are pathogenic; this was the case for 11 of the 21 genes associated with X linked disorders that met the inclusion criteria for this study. We also determined gene-specific pathogenicity thresholds that improved the performance of VEST4, REVEL and ClinPred, the three best-performing tools out of the seven that were evaluated; this was the case in 11, 11 and 12 different genes, respectively.ConclusionProSper can form the basis of a molecule-specific prediction tool that can be implemented into diagnostic strategies. It can allow the accurate prioritisation of missense variants associated with X linked disorders, aiding precise and timely diagnosis. In addition, we demonstrate that gene-specific pathogenicity thresholds for a range of missense prioritisation tools can lead to an increase in prediction accuracy.
| S-EPMC8961765 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called "standardized mean difference" or "effect size"). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.
| S-EPMC2959099 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
| PRJEB20349 | ENA
Project description:OBJECTIVE: Rigorous human-computer interaction (HCI) design methodologies have not traditionally been applied to the development of clinical trial participant tracking (CTPT) tools. Given the frequent us of iconic HCI models in CTPTs, and prior evidence of usability problems associated with the use of ambiguous icons in complex interfaces, such approaches may be problematic. Presentation Discovery (PD), a knowledge-anchored HCI design method, has been previously demonstrated to improve the design of iconic HCI models. In this study, we compare the usability of a CTPT HCI model designed using PD and an intuitively designed CTPT HCI model. METHODS: An iconic CPTP HCI model was created using PD. The PD-generated and an existing iconic CTPT HCI model were subjected to usability testing, with an emphasis on task accuracy and completion times. Study participants also completed a qualitative survey instrument to evaluate subjective satisfaction with the two models. RESULTS: CTPT end-users reliably and reproducibly agreed on the visual manifestation and semantics of prototype graphics generated using PD. The performance of the PD-generated iconic HCI model was equivalent to an existing HCI model for tasks at multiple levels of complexity, and in some cases superior. This difference was particularly notable when tasks required an understanding of the semantic meanings of multiple icons. CONCLUSION: The use of PD to design an iconic CTPT HCI model generated beneficial results and improved end-user subjective satisfaction, while reducing task completion time. Such results are desirable in information and time intensive domains, such as clinical trials management.
| S-EPMC3225206 | biostudies-other
Project description:During recruitment for a large, decentralized clinical trial for high-risk individuals with COVID-19, respondents were either transferred in real-time to a clinical research coordinator (i.e. warm transfer), or a callback time was arranged. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2341 respondents comparing the rate of enrollment among those who were warm-transferred and those for whom a callback was arranged. A respondent who warm-transferred was significantly more likely to enroll in the clinical trial.
| S-EPMC10395154 | biostudies-literature
Project description:EORTC 10994 is a phase III clinical trial comparing FEC with ET in patients with large operable, locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer (www.eortc.be). Frozen biopsies were taken at randomisation. RNA was extracted from 100um thickness of 14G core needle biopsies. Adjacent sections were tested by H&E to confirm >20% tumour cell content. 100 ng total RNA per chip were amplified using the Affymetrix small sample protocol (IVT then Enzo). 49 tumours were tested on Affymetrix U133A chips. The CEL files were quantile normalised together using rma. Clinical response data are not available yet. Keywords = Apocrine carcinoma Keywords = breast cancer
2005-06-01 | GSE1561 | GEO
Project description:Individuals with multiple relatives with colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or a relative with early-onset CRC have an increased risk of developing CRC. They are eligible for preventive measures, such as surveillance by regular colonoscopy and/or genetic counselling. Currently, most at-risk individuals do not follow the indicated follow-up policy. In a new guideline on familial and hereditary CRC, clinicians have new tasks in calculating, interpreting, and communicating familial CRC risk. This will lead to better recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk, enabling them to take effective preventive measures. This trial compares two implementation strategies (a common versus an intensive implementation strategy), focussing on clinicians' risk calculation, interpretation, and communication, as well as patients' uptake of the indicated follow-up policy.A clustered randomized controlled trial including an effect, process, and cost evaluation will be conducted in eighteen hospitals. Nine hospitals in the control group will receive the common implementation strategy (i.e., dissemination of the guideline). In the intervention group, an intensive implementation strategy will be introduced. Clinicians will receive education and tools for risk calculation, interpretation, and communication. Patients will also receive these tools, in addition to patient decision aids. The effect evaluation includes assessment of the number of patients for whom risk calculation, interpretation, and communication is performed correctly, and the number of patients following the indicated follow-up policy. The actual exposure to the implementation strategies and users' experiences will be assessed in the process evaluation. In a cost evaluation, the costs of the implementation strategies will be determined.The results of this study will help determine the most effective method as well as the costs of improving the recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk. It will provide insight into the experiences of both patients and clinicians with these strategies.The knowledge gathered in this study can be used to improve the recognition of familial and hereditary CRC at both the national and international level, and will serve as an example to improve care for patients and their relatives worldwide. Our results may also be useful in improving healthcare in other diseases.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929097.
| S-EPMC2832626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Individuals who are diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) today face the same historically intransigent problem that has existed since the initial description of the disease in the 1860s - a lack of effective therapies. In part, the development of new treatments has been hampered by an imperfect understanding of the biological processes that trigger ALS and promote disease progression. Advances in our understanding of these biological processes, including the causative genetic mutations, and of the influence of environmental factors have deepened our appreciation of disease pathophysiology. The consequent identification of pathogenic targets means that the introduction of effective therapies is becoming a realistic prospect. Progress in precision medicine, including genetically targeted therapies, will undoubtedly change the natural history of ALS. The evolution of clinical trial designs combined with improved methods for patient stratification will facilitate the translation of novel therapies into the clinic. In addition, the refinement of emerging biomarkers of therapeutic benefits is critical to the streamlining of care for individuals. In this Review, we synthesize these developments in ALS and discuss the further developments and refinements needed to accelerate the introduction of effective therapeutic approaches.
| S-EPMC7747476 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCurrently, the most promising therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are exon skipping and stop codon read-through, two strategies aimed at restoring the expression of dystrophin. A phase 3 clinical trial with drisapersen, a drug designed to induce exon 51-skipping, has failed to show significant improvement of the primary outcome measure, the six-minute walk test.DiscussionHere, we review some key points that should be considered when designing clinical trials for these new therapies. First, younger patients have more functional abilities and more muscle fibers to preserve than older patients and therefore are better subjects for trials designed to demonstrate the success of new treatments. Second, the inclusion of patients on corticosteroids both in the treatment and placebo groups is of concern because the positive effect of corticosteroids might mask the effect of the treatment being tested. Additionally, the reasonable expectation from these therapies is the slowing of disease progression rather than improvement. Therefore, the appropriate clinical endpoints are the prolongation of the ability to stand from the floor, climb stairs, and walk, not an increase in muscle strength or function. Hence, the time frames for the detection of new dystrophin, which occurs within months, and the ability to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression, which requires years, are strikingly different. Finally, placebo-controlled trials are difficult to manage if years of blindness are required to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression. Thus, accelerated/conditional approval for new therapies should be based on surrogate biochemical outcomes: the demonstration of de novo dystrophin production and of its beneficial effect on the functional recovery of muscle fiber. These data suggest that clinical trials for DMD patients must be adapted to the particular characteristics of the disease in order to demonstrate the expected positive effect of new treatments.
| S-EPMC4549867 | biostudies-literature