Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Corrigendum for Engels, Joyeux, Van der Merwe, et al. (2017) DOI: 10.1002/pd.5191.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Engels AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7613457 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Corrigendum for Engels, Joyeux, Van der Merwe, et al. (2017) DOI: 10.1002/pd.5191.

Engels Alexander C AC Joyeux Luc L Van der Merwe Johannes J Jimenez Julio J Pranpanus Savitree S Barrett David W DW Connon Che C Chowdhury Tina T TT David Anna L AL Deprest Jan J

Prenatal diagnosis 20180501 6

PMID: 29862554

Similar Datasets

Corrigendum to Bae et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11, 1089-1103, 2020. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12563.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7567145 | biostudies-literature

Hi-C ES and neocortex from Bonev et al. 2017

Project description:Reanalysis of some Hi-C from Bonev et al. 2017 with HiCUP version 0.6.1

2020-11-12 | GSE161259 | GEO

Adamo et al. 2017

Project description:RNA extraction from decaying wood for (meta)transcriptomic analyses

| PRJEB21716 | ENA

Hi-C ES and neocortex from Bonev et al. 2017 on mm39

Project description:Reanalysis of some Hi-C from Bonev et al. 2017 with HiCUP v0.9.2

2023-04-06 | GSE229113 | GEO

Further evidence that psychopathology networks have limited replicability and utility: Response to Borsboom et al. (2017) and Steinley et al. (2017).

Project description:In our target article, we tested the replicability of 4 popular psychopathology network estimation methods that aim to reveal causal relationships among symptoms of mental illness. We started with the focal data set from the 2 foundational psychopathology network papers (i.e., the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication) and identified the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing as a close methodological match for comparison. We compared the psychopathology networks estimated in each data set-as well as in 10 sets of random split-halves within each data set-with the goal of quantifying the replicability of the network parameters as they are interpreted in the extant psychopathology network literature. We concluded that current psychopathology network methods have limited replicability both within and between samples and thus have limited utility. Here we respond to the 2 commentaries on our target article, concluding that the findings of Steinley, Hoffman, Brusco, and Sher (2017)-along with other recent developments in the literature-provide further conclusive evidence that psychopathology networks have poor replicability and utility. (PsycINFO Database Record

| S-EPMC5687847 | biostudies-literature

Corrigendum for Neto et al., volume 116, 2016, p. 892-903.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9815898 | biostudies-literature

Reply to comments by Olson et al. 2017 and Stien 2017.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5719172 | biostudies-literature

Reply to comment by Kienle et al. 2017.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5627218 | biostudies-literature

Comment on the publication of Amiryousefi et al. (2017).

Project description:This announcement describes corrections and comments to the paper entitled 'The plastid genome sequence of the invasive plant common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Asteraceae)' by A Amiryousefi, J Hyvönen, P Poczai.

| S-EPMC7800051 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Soman et al, Alffenaar et al, Metcalfe et al, and Raoult.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4696596 | biostudies-literature