Correction notices in psychology: impactful or inconsequential?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Science is self-correcting, or so the adage goes, but to what extent is that indeed the case? Answering this question requires careful consideration of the various approaches to achieve the collective goal of self-correction. One of the most straightforward mechanisms is individual self-correction: researchers rectifying their own mistakes by publishing a correction notice. Although it offers an efficient route to correcting the scientific record, it has received little to no attention from a metascientific point of view. We aim to fill this void by analysing the content of correction notices published from 2010 until 2018 in the three psychology journals featuring the highest number of corrections over that timespan based on the Scopus database (i.e. Psychological Science wi
SUBMITTER: Heyman T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7657932 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA