Registered Report: Transcriptional Analysis of Savings Memory Suggests Forgetting is Due to Retrieval Failure.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: There is fundamental debate about the nature of forgetting: some have argued that it represents the decay of the memory trace, others that the memory trace persists but becomes inaccessible because of retrieval failure. These different accounts of forgetting lead to different predictions about savings memory, the rapid re-learning of seemingly forgotten information. If forgetting is because of decay, then savings requires re-encoding and should thus involve the same mechanisms as initial learning. If forgetting is because of retrieval failure, then savings should be mechanistically distinct from encoding. In this registered report, we conducted a preregistered and rigorous test between these accounts of forgetting. Specifically, we used microarray to characterize the transcriptional correl
SUBMITTER: Rosiles T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7665899 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov/Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA